Exemption for pressing buttons 14. (1) A person may drive a motor vehicle on a highway while pressing a button on a hand-held wireless communication device to make, answer or end a cell phone call ...... if the device is placed securely in or mounted to the motor vehicle ...... O. Reg. 366/09, s. 14 (1). I don't see a definition for "button". I have believed that cell phone screen "virtual" buttons are ok to answer calls But now wondering if courts/police interpret it that way?
Exemption for pressing buttons
14. (1) A person may drive a motor vehicle on a highway while pressing a button on a hand-held wireless communication device to make, answer or end a cell phone call ...... if the device is placed securely in or mounted to the motor vehicle
...... O. Reg. 366/09, s. 14 (1).
I don't see a definition for "button".
I have believed that cell phone screen "virtual" buttons are ok to answer calls
But now wondering if courts/police interpret it that way?
You are right that there is no definition of "button" in the Act, nor for that matter, has it been defined by case law. I think there is a valid argument for a 'virtual button' on a screen since very few phones now have physical buttons to place/end calls. From my experience though, the courts have allowed the pressing of an onscreen button, but do not allow swiping. So, if the person is simply pressing a virtual button to place/end the call, they should be ok. The problem however is that most folks don't know how to program their phones that way and need to swipe to get to the phone app, then want to dial by pressing the numbers on the screen, and THEN want to press the virtual button to place the call. That's definitely not what the exemption was intended for. It should only take a 1 time press of a button. Anything more than that and it becomes distracted driving; the whole point ("gravamen" as courts state) for the legislation. Realistically though, I think most people can now use voice activation to place calls via their phone without touching any virtual buttons or at least should be able to program their phone so that it simply only takes 1 press of the 'virtual button' to place a call (i.e. a shortcut on the Home Screen).
You are right that there is no definition of "button" in the Act, nor for that matter, has it been defined by case law. I think there is a valid argument for a 'virtual button' on a screen since very few phones now have physical buttons to place/end calls. From my experience though, the courts have allowed the pressing of an onscreen button, but do not allow swiping. So, if the person is simply pressing a virtual button to place/end the call, they should be ok. The problem however is that most folks don't know how to program their phones that way and need to swipe to get to the phone app, then want to dial by pressing the numbers on the screen, and THEN want to press the virtual button to place the call. That's definitely not what the exemption was intended for. It should only take a 1 time press of a button. Anything more than that and it becomes distracted driving; the whole point ("gravamen" as courts state) for the legislation.
Realistically though, I think most people can now use voice activation to place calls via their phone without touching any virtual buttons or at least should be able to program their phone so that it simply only takes 1 press of the 'virtual button' to place a call (i.e. a shortcut on the Home Screen).
Pretty much echo what highwaystar said. From reading other cases the focus has been was the person touching the phone to make, answer or end a call with a single touch. No emphasis on graphical buttons or physical. Once there's swiping involved, you're pretty much toast. Fiddling with phone settings, even though they might be driving centric (turning on bluetooth, etc) also no good.
Pretty much echo what highwaystar said. From reading other cases the focus has been was the person touching the phone to make, answer or end a call with a single touch. No emphasis on graphical buttons or physical. Once there's swiping involved, you're pretty much toast. Fiddling with phone settings, even though they might be driving centric (turning on bluetooth, etc) also no good.
I was involved in a collision a while ago. I was doing a left turn/u-turn in an intersection at the same time as someone else was doing a right-turn on the crossing road. There was no "no-u-turn" sign. My light was green and his was red. We basically converged in the center lane. There wasn't any…
Hey guys i'm new, i have a question about sticker renewal.
I pulled out my mail today and got a sticker renewal mail from ServicesOntario but new envelope letter different to my mom's one, mine expire in June and Mom is in July, i was reading the letter and saw that "Outstanding Fines 186$" and…
Guys back in january i got a speeding ticket on dvp, but i am 90% sure he did not caught me on radar, i asked for disclosure request and i just received today, I have asked for: a full copy of the police officers notes, a copy of both sides of the officers copy of the ticket, witness will say…
New thread created with posts copied over, orginals post deleted from a unrelated thread
David94Pro wrote:As far as I have been told if an officer asks you to open your hood during a traffic stop you can ask him to see his mechanics licence and DO NOT have to open your hood at all. and he is…
I'm considering buying a strap-on motor for a bicycle for this summer, such as the one at www.motorizedbicycle.ca/bicyâ¦ant-head-bike-motor-kit.html . However, I haven't been able to find any clear answers about what part of the law, if any, they fall under. The kit in question has a motor with a…
So Again, I really don't know how I'm attracting attention to myself, but I am.
Saturday at 1:30 in the morning I was pulled over on the 400 for 142 in a posted 100 Zone. Honestly, I know I was speeding, but I thought maybe 110-120 (I'm trying to clean up my act.) Anyways, Pulled over, Ticketed,…
Sorry if i may be posting in the wrong thread my questions are as follows;
1. Are Highway Traffic Act Matters Kept Public? Say if someone did an Appeal would that appeal be kept as public record accessible to anyone who may need it for reference?