Hi, I got this ticket last year in toronto and received court date recently. Basically I parket on a street where there are marked spots for car parking but they were all faded with only the white edges showing. I assumed I was in the correct spot when I got out. I never noticed the fire hydrant in the bushes. When I returned I saw the ticket and then noticed the fire hydrant and when I to the passenger side, noticed on the pedestrian walking area, someone has handwritten Fire-hydrant with an arrow pointing towards it. I can only assumed many people has done the same mistake and whoever felt the need to mark it on the street. I took pictures of the area, the firehydrant in the bushes, the markings on the road including the handwritten one. Now my questions: 1) It there are law that requires the car parking areas to be clearly marked? 2) There should be clear notices pointing towards the fire hydrant if it not obviously visible? 3) What other defence can I rely upon?
Hi,
I got this ticket last year in toronto and received court date recently.
Basically I parket on a street where there are marked spots for car parking but they were all faded with only the white edges showing. I assumed I was in the correct spot when I got out. I never noticed the fire hydrant in the bushes.
When I returned I saw the ticket and then noticed the fire hydrant and when I to the passenger side, noticed on the pedestrian walking area, someone has handwritten Fire-hydrant with an arrow pointing towards it. I can only assumed many people has done the same mistake and whoever felt the need to mark it on the street.
I took pictures of the area, the firehydrant in the bushes, the markings on the road including the handwritten one.
Now my questions:
1) It there are law that requires the car parking areas to be clearly marked?
2) There should be clear notices pointing towards the fire hydrant if it not obviously visible?
I believe most parking infractions are absolute liability offences. If it's an absolute liability offence, the Crown need only show that it was your vehicle parked in front of the hydrant. If it was a strict liability offence, you could argue that the hydrant wasn't visible and you made reasonable efforts to park legally, but I don't think that's the case. Unless someone can advise otherwise, I don't think there is much of a defence.
I believe most parking infractions are absolute liability offences. If it's an absolute liability offence, the Crown need only show that it was your vehicle parked in front of the hydrant. If it was a strict liability offence, you could argue that the hydrant wasn't visible and you made reasonable efforts to park legally, but I don't think that's the case. Unless someone can advise otherwise, I don't think there is much of a defence.
1/ No At the edge of the city there will be a sign (something like 2 hours max etc) That covers the main rule. After that sub by-laws for where, when, how long, you can, park. 2/ Yes What use is a hydrant if you cannot see it? 3/ Go into court with your pics and tell them not guilty. You will either be out of there in 5 minutes or they will make you wait until the end. Most likely you could have had it dropped at the window where you applied for trial. Cheers Viper1
sroghen wrote:
Hi,
I got this ticket last year in toronto and received court date recently.
Basically I parket on a street where there are marked spots for car parking but they were all faded with only the white edges showing. I assumed I was in the correct spot when I got out. I never noticed the fire hydrant in the bushes.
When I returned I saw the ticket and then noticed the fire hydrant and when I to the passenger side, noticed on the pedestrian walking area, someone has handwritten Fire-hydrant with an arrow pointing towards it. I can only assumed many people has done the same mistake and whoever felt the need to mark it on the street.
I took pictures of the area, the firehydrant in the bushes, the markings on the road including the handwritten one.
Now my questions:
1) It there are law that requires the car parking areas to be clearly marked?
2) There should be clear notices pointing towards the fire hydrant if it not obviously visible?
3) What other defence can I rely upon?
1/ No
At the edge of the city there will be a sign (something like 2 hours max etc)
That covers the main rule.
After that sub by-laws for where, when, how long, you can, park.
2/ Yes
What use is a hydrant if you cannot see it?
3/ Go into court with your pics and tell them not guilty.
You will either be out of there in 5 minutes or they will make you wait until the end.
Most likely you could have had it dropped at the window where you applied for trial.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
You are suggesting to show to the prosecutor the pictures before the trial starts and argue there were no visible signs pointing to the fire hydrant? Do you know the statute/regulation that requires clear markings pointing towards the fire hydrant? Thx
You are suggesting to show to the prosecutor the pictures before the trial starts and argue there were no visible signs pointing to the fire hydrant?
Do you know the statute/regulation that requires clear markings pointing towards the fire hydrant?
Maybe I misunderstood you? If there a hydrant you should be able to see it.(I thought you said it is not visible?) There is no sign needed unless it is behind a wall or some such thing. Yes, show, the pictures to the crown. And later to the judge if you need to. Don't mention anything about sidewalk markings. Luck Viper1
Maybe I misunderstood you?
If there a hydrant you should be able to see it.(I thought you said it is not visible?)
There is no sign needed unless it is behind a wall or some such thing.
Yes, show, the pictures to the crown.
And later to the judge if you need to.
Don't mention anything about sidewalk markings.
Luck
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
correct the hydrant was not clearly visible as it is in the bushes. You can only see it if you park across it and turn you head around to see it. Isnt there a law/by-law which states that the authorities should do everything possible to make the hydrant visible to drivers?
correct the hydrant was not clearly visible as it is in the bushes. You can only see it if you park across it and turn you head around to see it.
Isnt there a law/by-law which states that the authorities should do everything possible to make the hydrant visible to drivers?
I was driving on Eglinton W and turn right on Strathearn (near Eglinton/Allen Road). There was a no right turn (from 3pm to 7pm) sign which I didn't see.
The cop was waiting there, apparently nobody sees the signs but they are there.
I don't believe I have much to do here but, trying to find…
I know this technically doesn't fit on this board (3 demerit points) as it seems that 15km/h over just means a 50 dollar fine, I would like some advise though, I'm not sure how I should proceed.
The incident happened in Feb, driving south on highway 400 near Barrie. I was in the fast lane, doing…
Quick question about debris (broken taillights ect) from an accident and responsibility.
If someone hit something that broke off (not cargo), but 30 minutes after the original accident and other cars managed to avoid everything. The debris was avoidable who is responsible for damage to that car.
Need some advice on reaching a plea deal with the prosecutor and how to go about talking to the crown. I'm not here to be lectured ect. I'm aware I made a mistake, and need advice on fixing it. So kindly keep comments about my impulsive decision to yourself.
First post..... My fiancee this week was in an accident and she was handed a 3 demerit point 154 (1) (a) charge for 115 dollars or something and 3 demerit points.
Demerit points do not matter to insurance companies, convictions do ... is there a chance that she could go to court and the…
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster…
Got stopped for what I thought was going to be speeding, officer apparently had other ideas which needless to say surprised the heck out of me since Im positive I was not going over 150.
Ive done a LOT of reading already on here, Ticket Combat and some specific cases on Canlii (need to look up even…
I just received my first stop sign ticket in Markham. Has anyone successfully defended a stop sign ticket? If so, what strategies did you use? The officer that pulled me over said I slowed down but didn't stop. I felt that I stopped momentarily. I have no previous moving violations or…