Search found 2576 matches

These are both Criminal Offences (not a ticket) and therefore you should seek a lawyer.

this thread will be locked due to Criminal Offences.

Please feel free to post any HTA and other Provincial Offences questions, unrelated to this incident on another thread.

, I'd start with better training. Battering a person not posing a threat to you just to ensure compliance may have been "ok" in the 70's, but it's just plain wrong. There were enough constables out there to grapple the guy into the "proper" level of submission

We are not trained in grappling, karate, brazilian jujitsu (sp?) etc.. And just being ...

FiReSTaRT wrote:I pulled into the HOV just to make a right turn into a parking lot. .

maybe you can let us all know what road, Municipality so we do not run into this situation?

This way, for your defense at court, all statements are recorded, and if it's a case of mistakenly identifying a vehicle, then that would be recorded on video camera as well.

I treat every stop as if its recorded (audio/video or both).....no worries there

Video in a vehicle can not identify which target a radar or lidar is striking and at what ...

Radar Identified wrote:- "...there must be some evidence that the following distance constituted a danger having due regard to the speed of the vehicles, and the traffic and highway conditions.

how much more danger do you need? just plugged a vehicle from behind

yes, can use short forms. The check box is used if NO motor vehicle is involved with the offence. And having read the other post, do not even need a witness for that one!

i also don't think you can reopen 10yr old charges...if so everyone would do that hoping the officers retire/moved out of the country or are deceased.

If the charge(s) is that many years old...it probably is around $300-$1000 for each offence of no insurance....the $5000 came in about 4yrs ago.

Radar Identified wrote:I think FyreStorm pretty much covered it...

+ 1

PLUS ....many forget...when you RENT a vehicle - should always check for ownership and valid insurance card.....the rental agreement does not cut it

that is my articulation of the section(s).....any others thoughts?

The situation is:

"East and westbound directions are controlled by stop signs, and the north and southbound directions are through traffic."

The cars in question are East & Westbound.


I see this as follows:

Car A has been waiting to turn left, but due to North / South Bound traffic continues to yield the right of way per 136(1)(b).

Car B ...

I think what you remember and want is this:

http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/dandv/driver/handbook/section2.4.3.shtml

At any intersection where you want to turn left or right, you must yield the right-of-way. If you are turning left, you must wait for approaching traffic to pass or turn and for pedestrians in or approaching your path to cross ...

Canadian notaries public are generally restricted to administering oaths, witnessing signatures on affidavits and statutory declarations, certifying true copies, and so forth.

Therfore it is still a waste of time to notorize a request for disclosure. They would sign and stamp a request for disclosure, still NO proof it ever gets to the court ...

philkam wrote:Basically, if you are not recommend this as a tool, I would go with my first idea about road sign conflict (what is true).

how would you figure a 100km/hr zone on a 400 series hwy is a road sign conflict?

136. (1) Every driver approaching a stop sign at an intersection,
(a) shall stop his/her vehicle at a marked stop line or, if none, then immediately before entering the nearest crosswalk or, if none, then immediately before entering the intersection; and

(b) shall yield the right of way to traffic in the intersection or approaching the ...

By the way, Bear, you may wanna scoot over to the TPS.....
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/crime/police/article/782892--toronto-police-100k-club-continues-to-grow?bn=1
Michael Thompson, who was paid $161,892, and Abdulhameed Virani, who collected $151,042, were among the 380 constables who topped the $100K club in 2009.

Thompson and Virani didn ...

Statically warnings don't fix the problem. Sure most people will take the cover off, but cause we can't stop everyone, a large number will not. I've personally had several drivers make the changes, satisfy the 72 hr notice, then go put the illegal equipment back on.


Just to add to FyreStorm post... any length of notice (24, 48, 72hrs, a week ...

. Once most of the casual drunk driving got to be a bit of a taboo in polite society and drivers started paying attention to how much they drink, the effective blood alcohol limit got lowered.

the blood alcohol limit has not been lowered. Further it is 2 seperate charges you are merging into one, each charge has its own facts to meet the offence.

If 3) Prioritize and focus the enforcement activities on really dangerous habits or habits that cause really dangerous situations - running lights, not signaling turns/lane changes in traffic, cell phones (I still see people yapping all over the place but they're still safe as long as they don't go over the speed limit :roll:), left lane bandits ...

. If the public doesn't see the results of those internal reviews whose mystery is only exceeded by their power, we lose faith in the system where we are being punished for our wrongdoings while nobody's keeping a check on those doing the punishing.
As far as I know, all internal investigations involving the public, the results are known to the ...

Pham's death a reminder all we owe our police forces
POINT OF VIEW
By JOE BELANGER, The London Free Press
Last Updated: March 12, 2010 12:04am

Today, Huron OPP Const. Vu Pham will be buried.

It's a tragic reminder to us all of just how dangerous the job of policing our society can be and perhaps to reflect.

The only job in the country, other ...

provided there is no bylaw, what would you do as a conscientious driver?

I will always park right wheel to right side or always keep right. If it means I turn my vehicle aroun, so be it.

it is not b/c of work I do this....it's a little OCD, even in my own driveway 2 wide...right wheel to grass edge on right....if my wife happens to park on the ...

The notes provided could be directly on the back of the officer's copy of the offence notice. There is no need to put a date on the back of the ticket.
If the notes are in the notebook of the officer you should see a time to the left of a margin, that is where the notes start for the incident being photocopied.

just an fyi

What the "pink" summons does it "order" you to court on the specific date. On that date you will still have the normal 3 options(guilty, guilty with explanation or trial).

The zero fine listed is b/c the officer used the Provincial Offence Notice Summons, which is a "pink" summons in a normal "ticket book". There is a spot for a fine, but since ...

IMPROPERLY started topic DELETED. ...continuation of incident posted here

I went to the court today (Mississauga), and here is what happened:
As stated in my previous post, I did not get any disclosure up to the trial day, and hoped to get a stay. My case was left as the last one. The cop was there. The female prosecutor told me that they do not ...

From what I have seen it is only safe to park on the proper side. I have seen vehicle going in one direction, only to get the outline of a vehicle ahead,not seeing red (reflectors on back of vehicle), therefore thought the vehicle was coming at them with no lights on and went right...only to end up going across a curb and onto a lawn.

Someone ...

This is an interview to determine if the licence should be suspended, therefore it will remain in this area to be searched easier in the future. Most regular members likely hit "see topics since last visit", therefore the topic is brought up. Since you do not have any replies, I would guess that no one on here has been to an interview before or ...

hwybear,
Can you please explain what you mean by:

"However, Marco does have a good point in this section, that renders the "60m" guideline not applicable."

Thanks

You quoted the HTA which I thought you understood when you posted it

HTA OREG 615
Sec 45 - states signs should be visible for 60m of approaching traffic
Sec 47 - states that sec 45 ...

As for the photographs - I think that should take care of it. If you do not get a favourable ruling at trial, it still leaves the option open for an appeal, particularly with all the evidence you have. You've got proof the sign was not compliant with O.Reg 615. If the JP doesn't see it your way, a Justice hearing the appeal should.

However ...

Maybe a new system should be designed and pick one option online (no response in 7 days and you are found guilty)
1) plead guilty
2) plead guilty with time to pay
3) resolution court, where you try to make a resolution or then ask for trial court (waving your 11B)
4) trial court - there will be a trial, failing to attend for trial is an extra ...

But how come you can't request a trial date to dispute the charge online?
I would guess that b/c it would be way worse than the snail mailing system, people ask for a trial, tie up court time and do not show. Maybe a $500-1000 penalty should be imposed to anyone that does not show to trial after requesting one?

Why can't the prosecutors office ...