Search found 2576 matches

Hence, why good unmarked cruisers would be helpful, to see what I saw and Marquisse, at least would clean up a lot of stupid driving.

beleafer81 wrote: I dont do a full on hard break check, but theres no law against doing it. But someone may get injured..

HTA - there is a charge if no brake lights

CC - dangerous driving (situational pending)

ok, made my way thru the dreadful GTA today....phew...in one piece...freaking crazy out there....every 5th person yacking with a cellphone (not hands free)...2 with maps across their wheel, 4 writing while driving, one with an IPAD......too many people not moving to the right (including those in the centre lane that should move over too), thus ...

http://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/article/793087--testing-drivers-on-roads-less-travelled

Brett Popplewell
Staff Reporter
BANCROFT—They come here by the carload: would-be Toronto drivers, chauffeured to the edge of Algonquin Park by Toronto driving schools that, for a fee, help them take their road tests on some of the loneliest byways ...

Tired of the hearing the squirrels squeal?

Want that big car noise and remain environmentally friendly and save fuel?

here is your answer.....we have all been searching for....

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9XAC-BvUyo[/youtube]

Court Officer realized you did not receive disclosure in a timely fashion, therefore told the Crown and Crown just had the charge withdrawn to save another court date and arguement of delay, only to have a JP quash the offence. Saved court time and yours!

copied over from duplicate thread that is locked...

This is to let anyone know that if you are tickted for following too close by aircraft fight the charge. For my case, speed was never an issue only the observation from the aircraft to the ground unit to stop me for FTC. If you look at the last post from me anjs1224, you can read my story to see ...

please stay on the one thread....at...
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... ght=#12401

this thread locked...I copied over your above comment
HB
Moderator

Think you are getting a little mixed up with things here....

If you have a conviction from the HTA or Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act (CAIA) that will go onto your driver's licence, failing to pay the fee or were suspended that will affect your licence. This is from a conviction is registered by the courts and the courts notify the MTO who ...

You mentioned to let the higher ups in the OPP know about this, do you know whom I could contact and get actual results?

Call the detachment the officer is based out of (probably either Downsview or Aurora) and ask to speak to a Staff Sergeant. Any problems, ask for an Inspector. If I were in your shoes, I'd discuss the interaction with the tow ...

the stunt has nothing to do with "squealling of tires" but rather.....

Driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates an intention to cause some or all of its tires to lose traction with the surface of the highway while turning

- has to intentionally lose traction while turning

I think through the use of photos I could prove that the signs are not visible from 60m but does that even matter?

Yes it does. If the signs are not visible from 60m away, they are not enforceable.

Pending, there is an excemption for the 60m rule too.

Plus, if the driver was able to see the stop sign and come to a stop, they would have seen ...

http://www.thelaw.com/forums/showthread.php?p=9069
USA stuff = N/A, completely different court system, laws, procedures etc.

it does require objective evidence combined with the relevant factors at play that day (the general speed of the vehicles, the conditions of the road and weather, and the amount of traffic on the road at the time ...

FyreStorm wrote:I don't think any JP will convict for a 1 second of squealing, that can be as you all described above, VS the guy who lays a 100 m long patch leaving the Tim's while his buddies cheers him on.

That would be utterly stupid....everyone knows we are always there

rather than slow driving, there could have the use of lanes section updated...unless actively passing (within 50m front or back of vehicle being passed) a vehicle shall keep to the right.

- with the above added, make it an offence to pass to the right of any vehicle.

this would allow faster moving vehicles on the left and give someone moving back ...

On the link you provided.....there is 2 "no right turn" signs at that location. One on the same post as the stop sign and one across the street. Appears to also be a silly location for trees, why the trees were not planted 1 metre closer to the sidewalk...seems might be larger problems in the future when the trees are large, not in this direction ...

One would think it would be easier to beat. The officer in the plane has to be at the trial to give evidence. The officer on the ground cannot say "I observed you following too close" because he in fact didnt observe that. He cant say "the aircraft told me that they observed you following too close" at trial, because thats hearsay evidence (you ...

Most areas I have worked has a tow association and just ask for next tow on list. The one I am in now does not, so just get the closest tow to the location stopped, unless specific tow needed (ie: extended cab tow, CAA, heavy tow)

Being by a compound is not so uncommon, some collisions require a technical collision investigator who measures depths ...

All cruisers are outfitted identical.
- reduces costs by having the same equipment
- installed the same to speed up installation
- same location of items for officer to access
- all have cages have clear glass partitions
- all cruisers have 3 mirrors

Roof Rack vehicles (B&W) - nothing in back window area, except maybe a 3" round rear radar ...

hk111 wrote: On a different note, if you're so down on tinted windows, what are your thoughts on smoked lights?

The original poster was speaking of after-market tint added on top of the factory tint. Simple , both are illegal.

This is alarming

Beer contains female hormones! Yes, that's right, FEMALE hormones!


April 2009, Sydney University and scientists released the results

of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer.

Men should take a concerned look at their beer consumption.

The theory is that beer contains female hormones (hops ...

JohnnyKickass wrote: I'll say one thing, Brantford has a really hot bailiff!

so you are already in a no parking zone again

Radar Identified wrote:BTW, I wasn't being sarcastic. I was agreeing with you.

ok....thought you were using "Riiiiiiiiighhhhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttt" , but were instead using "Right"

but no comment on my donut joke

stylesx wrote:Makes sense guys, i was just wondering because a while back i could have sworn i read the traffic act and said that the plates must be located at the most front and back parts of the vehicle but now it doesnt read that,

It still reads that and has not changed.
Regulation 628 9 (3)

or can wait and receive a speed on target # 1, that vehicle passes and receive a speed on target #2...both proper readings.

Right. I see nothing wrong with an officer on the day of trial going "Hmm... defendant so-and-so..." (flips through notebook, finds notes), "oh yeah."

do this all the time....and many many many professions, careers are the same way with the work and document after and if they need to know what they did on that day they look back at a log book ...

Torgos_12 wrote:Hi,Just to fill out the info, there is a standard sign just behind the stop sign and one across on the other side of Hwy 88, nesteled in with a bunch of other markers and signs.

google maps - street view - when stopped at the proper stopped position both signs would be visible

beleafer81 wrote:Visit a dealership and get the proper mounting for the front plate.
It would help your case though if you get the problem fixed first.

+1

Radar Identified wrote:

hwybear wrote:the above decision also slams the "R vs Kassam" decision. starting on line 33

Sure about that? I thought he endorsed it...

Yes, continue into 34 - 36.

Reflections wrote: 2 cars at the same time.....you could get your ticket tossed. Care to tell us more?

routinely stop 2 at once....not a big deal