Search found 2576 matches

I have made this error before. Usually within the first couple weeks of a new year and the court is understanding with that type of thing.

On other occassions, I would get a photocopy of the ticket back in my diary slot at work, with *voided* wrote on it with the date "highlited". Just to let me know I messed up.

So I would guess that the court ...

There is no stinkin' quotas.....can write as many as we want

In 12 years I have never heard of anyone getting in crap-ola for not writing tickets nor have I seen anyone winning a toaster for having the most tickets either!

In our area, we have officers threatened on the highway, threatening notes left on garbage bags in a uturn, homemade steel spike belts placed in uturns and threatening phone calls.

I can't believe this s***!!! It's not the constable's fault that he has to do his job based on the guidelines that come from higher up above. In any case, even if he ...

TridentX2 wrote:Assuming that what I wrote was correct, was the stop legal?.

You mentioned the answer already

He calmly explained to me what I was doing could be miss-interpreted

TridentX2 wrote: I have had a ticket before (20m from the current ticket),

So your the one that keeps signing your name on the pavement with wax crayons
(just had to say that)

Court is in the jurisdiction on the back of the ticket.

Think you would have to mail in the request for trial or show up, so there is at least a tracking history of it.

My apologies.

"Correct, no way of knowing if a vehicle is insured except for the pink insurance card. There is no "magic" 1-800 number to call to find out, nor is the MTO linked to insurance companies either, although that would be the most logical thing."

In regards to my offense, I did not provide the officer anything but my name and address ...

I do remember, in class we learned of a landmark case that the supreme court stated that proving of licensing and insurance is a search, and stopping a vehicle is a seizure. I cannot find this case as I do not know where too look. I asked a member of the TPS and she stated that she knew of such case, and when it was brought forth all the TPS ...

TridentX2 wrote:hwybear

The officer was able to determine I was insured without having ANY physical identification.

sorry....I don't understand what you just wrote.

FiReSTaRT wrote:, most of us would like to be able to express our views without fear of prosecution. .

Absolutely agree, there is a proper place and time to do these types of things.

FiReSTaRT wrote:. I don't see anything that prevents our legislators from passing arbitrary laws against public gatherings, .

Wish they actually would do this. Just to prevent people from blocking vehicles on highways.

Driving under suspension is HTA only not a Criminal offence, so do not worry on that part.

Here is the section and the penalties that you could face if convicted.....
53. (1) Every person who drives a motor vehicle on a highway while his or her drivers licence is suspended is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable,
(a) for a first ...

"confuse" identity of plate is what the tint is doing. Ontario plates furnished by the Ministry are white. Not blue, pink, gray, yellow.

Obstruct plate is having the bicycle rack and 4 bicycles, preventing the clear view of the plate.

Bookm wrote:Maybe "fix-it" ticket is only for our local PD. LEO writes a roadside order to fix problem. You have 24 hours to show up at police station with problem corrected. Hand over $10 and go on your way.

Not an OPP option??

No

Maybe they are all driving properly and it is the "yahoo" that caught up to them

Bookm wrote:The cop could have easily have written you a $10 fix-it ticket.

What is this?

Lots of illegal items one can buy a put on a car. Most such as plate covers have a warning on the package to consult local state and provincial laws prior to application. A couple companies also indicate items are for "off-road" use only.

Radar Identified wrote:. If no, then take a photograph with a time-date stamp on it, do some measurements to back it up, etc. what it's worth. Some other members may have additional or better advice.

A good crown (like ours) gets personal photos tossed from defence all the time.

Time = would be the time on the offence notice

Where: would be the location on the offence notice.

The plane does whatever it does, radios to a cruiser on the very next ramp maintain commmunication (plane/cruiser) until the target vehicle is stopped.

Squishy wrote: Hey, doesn't the code sheet get printed on paper trees, too?

Yes it does "Mr. Smarty Clown"

Reflections wrote:Are you gonna bust someone for 95 in a 90??

Far as I know the local PS are doing anyone at 6km and over (where the 16 over was).

If disclosure is requested, I think the notes should be typedst of you guys. up and the short forms and code expanded to something meaningful. .

I completely disagree with typing of notes. If the words or codes are legible, no need to waste more time and cut down trees. I also toss in a short form code sheet with my notes....so if the person ...

irietek wrote:If I went to the police station to produce my none-expired stub would they have the authority to tear up my ticket if they were in a good mood this morning? =)

Sorry, the PON can not just be torn apart. Only a JP can now mark a PON withdrawn.

Only way I will vote for him is IF photo radar is back.

Will drivers abide by 110km? or do the usual I can get away with 20over and now drive 130? or will they remain at 119ish?

I know the local council here raised some rural roads from 80km - 90km this spring. However the local police have taken a zero tolerance policy in these areas. I travel ...

Is there any way to fight this?

Are officers suppose to give you a certain amount of time to produce your stub?

Must surrender a valid insurance card upon demand. And that is when asked to surrender, not after the officer goes back to cruiser and returns to the car.

There is no such thing as 24hrs to produce.....just an urban legend....or was ...

So lets say your on the highway going 125 and someone butts infront of you at 105.

What are you to do????.

You slow down and then have to drive a speed that someone else is comfortable with. However, IMHO this is now a unsafe lane change if you had to immediately hit your brakes to avoid a collision.

To my take on a unsafe lane change and/or ...

Reflections wrote: However, nobody is going to stop him from doing this again, law or no law.

Could always get jail time for driving under suspension. Last person I saw got 45days, served on weekends.

Radar Identified wrote: Even if notes are not clear, Bookm said it best: If an officer plans to use his notes, defence has the right to see what information is in the notes.

I completely understand that. But the notes are to refresh my memory, so I could have more than what's in my notes stored in my "pea" brain.

Radar Identified wrote:Take some photographs of the area with a time-date stamp on it showing that there are no signs indicating that it was a fire route. .

A good prosecutor would be able to make those photos null void too.

raise the speed, but bring back photo radar with zero tolerance!

all depends on the "flavour" of the day who wins the political race or how many people can be baffled by BS (ie gun registry)