Search found 2576 matches

by hwybear
Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:00 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
Replies: 18
Views: 47004

Re: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?

. The study in Japan following their stud ban indicates a marked increase in accidents. .

Could this be the fault of complacency? where drivers rely more on the equipment or lack thereof....and don't readjust their driving habits?

I see this every snow storm......the invincible drivers that refuse to slow down for changing road conditions ...
by hwybear
Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:27 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
Replies: 18
Views: 47004

Re: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?

I'd be doing this as a conscientious objector because all the literature I've read (including this one: http://www.engr.uaa.alaska.edu/research/upload/StuddedTiresInAlaska.pdf )indicates that the research on which Ontario relied when it instituted the ban (before I was born) is no longer valid with today's much less aggressive studs.

from that ...
by hwybear
Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:03 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
Replies: 18
Views: 47004

Re: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?

$110 ticket for driving with studs....plus MV could be towed to a prevent the repetition of the offence
by hwybear
Thu Oct 08, 2009 7:34 pm
Forum: Police Cruisers and Vehicles
Topic: Don't run
Replies: 23
Views: 8642

Re: Don't run

Radar Identified wrote:On a side note, think the OPP's Cessna 206H has a cruising speed of about 140 knots true airspeed (about 260 km/h). Someone trying to run would really have to floor it for a long period of time! :shock:
What is 140knots true air speed? Was told it was Cesna 206 turbo at 178knots. But I don't know the difference in that jargon.
by hwybear
Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:59 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Government proposes random breathalyzer tests
Replies: 20
Views: 6361

Re: Government proposes random breathalyzer tests

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 1987 that cops can stop you for any reason and check documents. However Bear is incorrect when he states there is nothing illegal in them searching your car for any reason. .

Maybe it is time to read, before some knee-jerk response

Here is what I wrote...I'll even put the word you seemed to skip in big ...
by hwybear
Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:08 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Government proposes random breathalyzer tests
Replies: 20
Views: 6361

Re: Government proposes random breathalyzer tests

This is just more random checking, which will go against our Canadian Charter of Rights.

David Eby, the executive cirector of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, expressed worry about automatic testing from police.

"Canadians generally have a feeling that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a good thing, that being free from arbitrary ...
by hwybear
Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:37 pm
Forum: Courts and Procedure
Topic: Aircraft Enforcement
Replies: 2
Views: 2261

Re: Aerial

pch2004 wrote: - testified about his training history on radar (NOT used in this stop)
This evidence was required for this particular case, but not required for all cases of this nature
by hwybear
Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:28 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: Government proposes random breathalyzer tests
Replies: 20
Views: 6361

Re: Government proposes random breathalyzer tests

If the law has an effect such as it has in Australia or Ireland......I'm all for it.
*****************************************
Feds consider letting police conduct random DUI tests
Janice Tibbetts, Canwest News Service
Published: Sunday, October 04, 2009

OTTAWA - The federal Justice Department is considering a new law to randomly force drivers ...
by hwybear
Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:39 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: New OHTA Section 78 "Distracted Driving"
Replies: 5
Views: 2633

Re: New OHTA Section 78 "Distracted Driving"

Radar Identified wrote:I really hope it is $500, .
yes and no, the fail to move left is $490 and about 90% go to trial. I do not know if it is b/c the fine is so high or the 3 points? I rarely have a seatbelt at $110 2 points go to trial.
by hwybear
Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:36 am
Forum: General Talk
Topic: New OHTA Section 78 "Distracted Driving"
Replies: 5
Views: 2633

Re: New OHTA Section 78 "Distracted Driving"

Proper1 wrote:I think the penalties will include 6 demerit points -- correct? Do we know yet how much they're going to ding us for fines?.
Maybe it will have the same fine that is already available for using a TV.. $110 and no points
by hwybear
Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:48 pm
Forum: General Talk
Topic: no signature?
Replies: 2
Views: 1295

Re: no signature?

no signature = DOH!!
by hwybear
Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:03 am
Forum: General Talk
Topic: server problems
Replies: 4
Views: 1429

Re: server problems

received this error.....3 times this AM
**************************************
Internal Server Error 500
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, support@dot5hosting-inc.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might ...
by hwybear
Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:56 am
Forum: General Talk
Topic: When do demerit points take effect?
Replies: 3
Views: 4971

Re: When do demerit points take effect?

HTA OREG 339/94
2. If a person is convicted of an offence under a provision of an Act, regulation or municipal by-law set out in Column 1 of the Table to this Regulation and the penalty imposed by the court for the conviction does not include a period of licence suspension, the Registrar shall record in respect of the person, as of the date of ...
by hwybear
Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:35 am
Forum: General Talk
Topic: server problems
Replies: 4
Views: 1429

server problems

01OCT09, I could not log on at all. Even this AM, it took a couple minutes. Just checking to see if others had this issue?