Ontario Highway Traffic Act

]
-Driving a 4 cylinder vehicle to my parenths house, the other vehicle whom they're notes did not identify was a red dodge magnum, similar color, even thaught one is a hatchback and the other a sedan, they still look similar.
-In the dark in the middle of the country with no lights on, in a stationary position you cannot identify oncoming ...

thread is duplication from original post.

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... html#10867

this thread locked

copied from locked thread (same incident)

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1605.html

I am going to trial soon. I have a question here and hope to get some advise.
I remember the officer who stopped me was not the officer who issued me ticket. At that moment, the officer who issued me the ticket was sitting in the policy car to write ...

Like Bookm, I would never consent to a search of my vehicle. However, I would be extremely professional about it, asking the officer what his/her reasonable cause is to feel a search of my vehicle is necessary, but still refuse to consent. .

Now how to put this.

If I have an Act/law authorizing me to search I will do so, regardless of whether ...

to keep the flow going...copied info over from

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1604.html (LOCKED thread)

Well, I am trying to get ahold of the prosecutors office. I was wondering, is there any chance I can plea bargain with them. The officers evidence is as follows.
----------------------------------
Stationary Hwy 69.
Bigwood ...

continuation of an old post

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1504.html

this thread now locked

Then I saw:

A convenience fee of $2.50 is applied to every transaction.

They should not be allowed to pass on the transaction fees to us. That is the Cities operation cost. Why do we have to pay it?

The parking ticket is already a rip off and now I have to pay MORE for the LUXURY of being able to pay online! I think that just sucks!

not any ...

if you don't know where the officer was...maybe you pulled out in front of the cruiser and hit had to change lanes or something?

Ask for disclosure and it will give you more insight, rather than you and others on here trying to answer if the offence applies without all the details

Do NOT reach into anywhere, do not place your stuff out in the open.

Is that something that all ODOTS would rather see? Or does it depend on the officer?

Not sure, might be more officer thoughts, area patrolled, how many stops they typically do etc....so many variables. Each stop is different.

As i said I have never ever seen anything placed ...

Squishy wrote:

burgersgirl wrote:So what is best answer to the question "do you know how fast you were going"?

The truth.

BINGO, better chance of a break if one is honest.

do not place your stuff out in the open

Why is that?
Is the documents/purse on dash the wrong move? .

I would not say the wrong move. In my time, I have never ever seen that done thou

My personal preference is just stop, let me ask for documents, then tell me they are reaching here or there to the ownership, insurance or licence.


oops :oops ...

- Get your paperwork ready (licence, insurance, registration) and place it on the dashboard before the cop approaches your car.

Do NOT reach into anywhere, do not place your stuff out in the open. Police do not know what the movement in the car is for (documents or weapon)

- keep hands visible for all occupants
- tell officer where your ...

Reflections wrote:

Stuffing it under your door is no way to serve it.

I thought there had to be proof, i.e. signature, of delivery?

there is no signature required by a defendant on a offence notice or summons

TridentX2 wrote:*When I said 5-10 cops, there are SIX streets in our town, its a 1kmx1km space.. I mean, its unreasonable.

I do not think it is unreasonable if someone is threatening the police. Each one of them want to go home to their families at the end of the shift.

Squishy wrote:I thought Fantino proposed that a few years ago. What became of it?

think it was after some winter storm where there was well over 1000 vehicles needlessly in ditches and it was mentioned in the paper, but don't think any government mentioned it.