Search found 1367 matches

Although he did never tell us his favorite kind of doughnut.

--Boston Creme, pay attention and Cafe Mocha........sally on that one

Didn't hear about those. I heard that some people might want ESC but that could be a hinderance to "expierienced" drivers

so, how about those HID's........still not good to use them in a halogen reflector......

http://www.trunkmonkey.com/content/category/4/68/51/

I had to repost the trunk monkey ads

don't answer the phone....when you get the message press 33 to skip to the end.....7 to delete....mother ignored.......NEXT!

That section was written well before HID's were even thought of...what do you know, an outdated law that is still on the books. Is it still illegal to pay for something more then 25 cents in pennies?????????

And bigger vehicles have bigger brakes, larger swept area....

Mazda3 fits me and I'm 6 foot.....zoomzoom

Were you saving those up..........

Q: When driving through fog, what should you use?
A: Your car.

Q: How can you reduce the possibility of having an accident?
A: Be too s**t faced to find your keys.

Classic........lmao

Can we get a sticky for jokes....

So, it all depends on which 5 km/h it is...........

Jokes - about handling??

My standard joke about car handling came from Road & Track magazine a million years ago:

"If you go into a corner too fast and the driver panics, its understeer.

"If the passenger panics, its oversteer."

The idea being that understeer, when the car plows straight ahead, is barely even noticed by the passenger because ...

A police officer pulls a guy over for speeding and has the following exchange:
Officer: May I see your driver's license?
Driver: I don't have one. I had it suspended when I got my 5th DUI.
Officer: May I see the owner's card for this vehicle?
Driver: It's not my car. I stole it.
Officer: The car is stolen?
Driver: That's right. But come to think of ...

Google map the road and put it up here..... Sounds like another fellow on here

Another reason to upgrade your brake system first..... . Oh, and if that driver hadn't have looked at the other driver he would have reacted faster.....Don't drive distracted

You'll have to get disclosure to find out all the details.....the readings on any lidar/radar are skewed (they read lower) when tracking a vehicle at an angle... could you be more specific as to where on 10 you were...I drive from orangeville to oakville everyday...

And they don't worry about maintenance......

racer wrote:Well, the good thing is that there is a mandatory court date, because there you can sue the Crown for theft right on the spot!

X2

Trespassing, disturbing the peace, Dangerous driving (same as S172 as far as insurance goes), Careless driving.....

Where in there does it say parking lot??? A place intended to leave your vehicle. Have you ever seen a speed trap at Walmart?

Case law.......http://www.canlii.org/

The OHTA does not apply to private property, such as mall parking lots. However, the criminal code does apply; dangerous driving and so do noise by-laws.

Bookm wrote:The more the municipalities make, the less they need from the Provincial Government. Therefore, the Provincial government (in effect) profits as well.

So they can dish the money to their friends........wait that's the fed's

hwybear wrote:

Reflections wrote:What about C/O??

what is C/O?

Constantly on.... I was chatting with an officer friend one day and his radar would get one speed, then another, then another. Now, he couldn't track the vehicles and we were talking hockey...... but he kept getting readings, so the unit was constantly transmitting.

The reading notes and obtaining reading in your scenario is impossible.

What about C/O?? They do still have them in use........and I never said "fuzz buster", I'm sure there will be a posting on the 'ol Radar Detector Forum...

"Got stopped by the OPP today, they have this fancy new gizmo called "My Eyes" :o "
http://forums.blueline.ca ...

No, he had the lidar up to his eye, trigger pulled..... He could have been trialling, testing..whatever. I did not see if he pulled anyone over, we were all doing 110 in a 100 zone. However, if the officer leaves the Speed Measuring Device on, starts doing paperwork, gets a reading, looks up to visually identify the offender he could have the wrong ...

So, as much as the OHTA itself then?

Rename the web site

Ontario Traffic Confussion
Rules you may understand one day

The officer will testify to what bear said, visually of vehicle speed confirmed with radar/lidar. You won't be able to prove otherwise, unless you have a witness to his modus operandi.

I watched an officer the other day, sitting under an overpass, and he targeted a line, maybe ten cars in the left lane. My speedo said 110.... why would he be ...

should send me in the disclosure

That won't be in disclosure.....

Damn, I dropped the baby, I was laughing so hard......


DIDTBIWLSH.....is that too long an acronym??