Search found 1367 matches

Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.........G.I. Joe........

Just sayin'..........

But as long as I'm covered......



.......................





.........I kidnapped Jimmy Hoffa. Whoa, thats a load off.........

Do yourself a favour and get in touch with video services. However, if there is a video then it should have come with the disclosure package.

I mean Ive gone 250km/h in my mustang before on the back roads before

and this was well more then 6 months ago.............. :shock:

I think the new law has been around longer then 6 months hasnt it?

If an officer has reason to believe you have done anything under S.172 in the last 6 month's then they could come to your door and lay the ...

If that tape was re-recorded over before trial that would be destruction of evidence...... and that's criminal...

I'll bet dollars to donuts there is no video...... If you cannot secure it then ask for a dismisal based on lack of disclosure.

I mean Ive gone 250km/h in my mustang before on the back roads before

and this was well more then 6 months ago..............

It still remains that the officer was holding up the "normal" flow of traffic. Numeric speed limits are not at issue here. Flow is flow. Any person, and I mean any, should be looking in their rearview mirror and see if there is a line up of cars behind them. If there is, move the hell over. I do believe that the more vehicles in close proximity, i ...

RCMP have all over canada.

Yep but they don't enforce provincial laws, OHTA for example.

Lets say they stopped for a couple of red lights....The numbers still say they were speeding.......by a large number

Now we need some newfie's telling newfie jokes


Wait.........

I not newfie BTW

There must still be some kind of jurisdiction needed?(no?)


OPP can arrest/enforce anywhere in Ontario, no questions...... i.e. the officer in the traffic plane, he flies over the 401, 400 and 11.......and has to testify in all the regions. Local officers, i.e. Toronto Police, have never bothered me on a 4-series highway.

Now if you do ...

if fantino had his way we'd all be walking around with padding and helmets...protecting ourselves from ourselves......

Given the 134 kilometres between the detachment and Queen's Park and the timeline Donnelly provided, MacKenzie said Tapp couldn't have driven more than 50 km/h over the speed limit.

So, they left at 3:37 and arrived at 4:45.........68 minutes. 120 km/h=2km per minute. 134 divide by 2= 67 minutes. DVP = 90 km/h

Driving directions to Queen's Park ...

Definition, "stunt"
8. Driving a motor vehicle without due care and attention, without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway or in a manner that may endanger any person by,

Lack of consideration for others.......hhhhmmmmmmm

We could load it up with "porn"



Or

TC...speaking of face value of a PON. What about the signature? I have two ways of thinking on this.
1) Sign the top copy, identical signature is complete thru each layer of the PON, thus all are original and identical
or
2) Rip out the defendants copy and sign it in ink, then sign the top of the PON, thru the remaining copies. But does this then ...

Tahoe is very smooth, and is faster than the crown vic on low end and only 2km slower at top end.

And chugging a gazzilion litres more gas.....

Now this is a neat question i have for hwybear. What would the court do if you argue you were only going 30 over because everyone else was going 120 km/h?.

I do not know that. I have heard the usual going with "the flow" blah blah blah defence heard in court thou, with a conviction still at the clocked speed. JP basically indicated that just b/c ...

Don't do drugs, you'll end up like this!

'Bear: Is this what you use around the office??

It worked for me but this was about 20 years ago.

You are so 1900's.......

Next thing you know you'll wanna duel with pistols at 10 paces.....

I got a ticket 3+ years ago in another province. No tickets in ontario ever.

I do intend to get there early to speak to the prosecutor, but do I check the INTEND TO CHALLENGE? or not?

You have to tick the 'Intend to Challenge", so that they can schedule you in court. 3+ years is for insurance only, that ticket can be seen by officers for ever ...

If i show up at the given trial date early, don't get that opportunity to speak to the prosecutor then?

I have no idea how to answer the "intend to challenge" checkbox if i indeed check option 3.

Check option 3 and talk to the prosocuter before the trial. If they agree to what you're asking they will do all the talking. Is your record clean?

Sounds to me like her was performing a "stunt" and should have his license yanked for a week!

Definition, "stunt"
8. Driving a motor vehicle without due care and attention, without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway or in a manner that may endanger any person by,

i. driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates ...

I doubt that the paparazzi could keep up to the book.......

400, 11 and hwy 9 have painted markers on the side and median for stop watch timing.

Your address can be fixed in court. If the location of the infraction is wrong then you have a case to have the ticket thrown out.

scorchedmoon wrote:the only thing i mentioned to the police officer was have a nice new years...

now my next question is, if he doesnt mention the TL in his argument where does that leave me and

Cruise control is ok. The speed on your speedo isn't accurate anyway..... not worth a damn as far as court goes. You will need to mention the TL though......