Ontario Highway Traffic Act

You should also check local bylaws where you may be riding which may prohibit bicycles from riding two or more abreast.

You're over analyzing this and speculating at the moment about most of the potential evidence. Wait until you get disclosure and then post any questions you may have.

You may also need to request further disclosure to include the manual version. The testing procedure I have is three pages in length. It does state that the tests be performed before shift and no mention of after the conclusion of enforcement actions. However, testing before and at the conclusion of enforcement action is standard in Ontario.

Like I said, It's usually in local policy and procedures, not in law. Violation of the policy or procedure can result in a charge under the Police Services Act.

I don't know of any Act or Regulation that would require a Peace Officer to identify themselves. However, there is a possibility that an individual agency may have requirement in their own General Orders with regard to wearing either a visible badge number or name tag and/or identifying themselves when requested.
The officers name and number would ...

Read the conclusion.

Here's the link to the decision. Read it or don't.
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/199 ... ii108.html
argyle and bend are correct.

1) You'd have to go through Regulation 604 of the HTA to see if that area is covered in the Schedule prohibiting parking.
2) Regulation 627 prohibits all pedestrians from Hwy 401. In my opinion, If you're out of your car and it's not an emergency, you're a pedestrian.

Wow. That's all I have to say.

You might want to research some NB legislation. I don't think you'll get many here who would know.

You have to specifically request that the officer be present if that's what you want. They wont be there and since u didn't request them, you can't have it tossed out if they don't show.

Community service is not an option at all in Provincial Offences court.

One of my first stunt divers was a 89 over (149 in a 60) The driver was 17 years old and without going to trial the defence and prosecutor came to a deal of a year suspension and a $2000 fine. The JP made a comment that if the two parties had not come to an agreement he would have sent the young man to jail. He also didn't have any convictions ...

Both.

Enforcement from an area the you believe is private property will not invalidate the ticket and the JP won't care.
You're reaching for something that isn't there.