Search found 726 matches

Entirely possible. Testing the radar only takes about a minute, including the road test.

You can't turn a speeding ticket into a non-moving violation. The best ive seen is a ticket for disobey sign which still has demerits on it and a $110 fine.

You might want to consider doing some research on case law and through some older threads regarding the radar manual, it's use in court, radar interference, and accuracy of the radar. All of your points and questions have been covered before.
The main point about all of the interference that you mention is that none of it affects the accuracy of ...

Don't count on an adjournment on your trial date if the officer is there and you have received your disclosure. Your trial notice is just that. The date for a trial. The JP may or may not allow a request for an adjournment.

The Crown is under no obligation to proved everything in disclosure. Some f it may not exist and some of it they may say is not necessary to your defence. Ths is where you will need to state why you believe that having the entire manual is necessary. Most jurisdictions allow the accused access to the manual at an agreed upon time at the police ...

Nope. They are sent to the MTO.

First of all the term is tracking history, second depending on the manufacturer of the radarl/lidar there is no requirement to perform a tracking history in most manuals. However, it is still taught and there is no requirement to estimate the speed of a target vehicle. It is sufficient to state that the target was in excess of the posted speed.

Just wondering why the concern with having no demerit points? Insurance companies don't care about points. They care about tickets. They treat most offences as a minor whether it has demerits on it or not.

My bad. I was looking at the wrong page.
This was the correct one. http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/dandv/driver/handbook/section2.10.2.shtml

daggx is correct.. It's not likely that you can go back and fight it.
Make sure you turn your licence in to begin the 30 day countdown on your suspension. The sooner you do it, the sooner the suspension is ...

Four points don't get you suspended even if you are considered a novice driver (G1 and G2). 2-5 points and you get a warning letter, 6-8 you attend an interview and it may be suspended and at 9 points you get a 60 day suspension.
By chance do you have more than just the one ticket in the last two years??

I'm with Stanton on this one. I'd swear this was already posted as well.

Other than actual obstruct plate charges (tinted covers and dirt) I've never had any of the faded plates go to trial. It's entirely possible the prosecutor withdraws to charge after satisfactory proof of replacement or reduces the fine on a guilty plea.

That is the correct section but the wrong wording. There are actually three offences in that sub section and a corresponding wording for each. The correct wording should have been: Entire plate not plainly visible.
The other wordings cover 1-dirt and obstructions like snow, and 2- parts of the vehicle or attachments like bike racks.

Just make sure you go to a licensing office and pay the reinstatement fee after the suspension is over. If you don't, you will still be considered an unlicensed driver.

Tree branches that may impede the laser will not affect the accuracy at all, only the range. If you were going around a corner, there may be more of a cosine effect which would make your actual speed higher than what was displayed on the laser.

This is the third thread you've started on the same incident and I believe the question on the filing if the bylaws was answered for you.

I don't see that the OP mentioned any error. Just asking about crossing the border.

Section 137 of the HTA says:
Stop signs, erection at intersections
137. In addition to stop signs required at intersections on through highways,
(a) the council of a municipality may by by-law provide for the erection of stop signs at intersections on highways under its jurisdiction; and
(b) the Minister may by regulation designate intersections on ...

Ther is no offence for passing on a solid line. They are guidelines on the road to suggest that you shouldn't pass. They usually are situated near curves or grades where it is illegal to pass. See section 148 and 149 of they HTA.

They can and will modify the charge back to the original speed if you choose to go to a trial. That doesn't preclude you from requesting a trial, getting disclosure and seeing what evidence there is. You can always just pay the fine anytime up to the start of the trial if you chose.

If you want to know the answers to all of those little questions, you'll have to take your chance at a trial and ask the officer on the stand, and also risk a conviction for 91 in a 60.
It appears that when they turned around, you were also paced by the police and that's how it was determined as "sustained"
The only way to know for sure is a trial ...

Couple things. First, delete the other thread that you started to avoid repetition and confusion in the posts.
The officers notes are just to refresh his/her memory of the incident. Every minute detail doesn't have to be in there. You will have an opportunity to cross examine the officer at trial and can ask them anything pertinent to the charge ...

Sorry JohnnyPublic, a bylaw officer can seize and hold an accessible parking permit if they have reasonable grounds to believe that it has been used while in contravention of a bylaw.

The downside of requesting a second test would be if that test resulted in a fail reading, you would then be subject to a Criminal charge.

Complete and regular on its face is determined by the JP looking at the original of the ticket. I have no doubt that the JP will convict since they don't have access to any of the copies. I'm sure you will be convicted if you do nothing. You will then have to apply to have the case re-opened. Only you can decide whether the time that you will spend ...

If you zoom in on the ticket it actually looks like the bottom of the loop in the 9 is there. The only way to be sure is to look at the original copy of the ticket which is what the JP will have.

You seem to have a very good grasp of the English language. Why is there a need for an interpreter?

Just make sure you read over the sections of the regulation pertaining to exemptions for commercial use of hand held devices to make sure you fit all of the points for the exemption.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0366_e.htm

Highwaystar solves my mystery. Way too tired to be thinking this much. Lol

It appears you're cherry picking subsections of the HTA to try and justify a properly laid charge under section 182(2).
What section of the HTA is (9) from?