Search found 726 matches

Karra might want to read section 9 of the Provincial Offences Act.
15 days.

Parking lots are private property and it's very unlikely that an owner would grant permission for someone under 16 to drive a motor vehicle on the lot. Too much of a liability issue.
If you decide to do it without permission, the Tresspass to Property Act could be used to either remove you from the property and or lay a charge.
Certain parts of ...

It's still not a right on your own property under certain circumstances. If you're a prohibited driver, you cand even drive a riding mower.

If driving was a "right" then there would be no ability to enforce even simple traffic violations, suspend licences or regulation any use of the highways.
And anyone with the cash can get a copy of anyone's Drving Abstract or information on the owner of a motor vehicle.

How is it a violation of a right, when driving is a privilege and all ALRP does is automate the input of a licence plate number?

We were taught that in a rural are its fence line to fence line and it a city it's "store front" to "store front". Most cities own a portion of the property up a residential front lawn for the purposes of installing infrastructure etc.

I wouldnt be hinging this whole thing on that one lower court decision. I've looked at a few more that decide ...

The problem with this is that the "court" will not see your disclosure request. Only the prosecutor will and they will likely only give you the testing procedure. In order to get the entire manual, you may have to justify the request in front of the JP and of course, the prosecutor will also have a chance to say why they don't have to give it to ...

Don't be surprised if all you get is a copy of the testing instructions for the device. That's all That most jurisdictions will give you.

Your opinion is he was off by 26 km/h. He would probably say different. That's why we have a court process.
The last thing you want to do if you have another trial would be to admit that you were speeding on the stand.

That's an easy skill to learn if you are using radar or lidar regularly and be within +/- 5 km/h ever time.

It's just one signal (beam). The easiest way to explain it is: The strongest signal returned is used as the patrol speed of the police vehicle and the second strongest signal is the target.
Inside the radar, the single signal actually gets split to do the calculation of a patrol speed and target speed.

If you dot ask for disclosure, the JP may also decide against an adjournment and have the trial go ahead that day.

Yep. It's outdated.

In newer Genesis units, the fast selection isn't even required. The radar automatically detects whether the target is faster or slower.

It's not a feature of any Decatur product that I know of. However, If the radar is paired with a video camera in a police vehicle it would be possible to overlay gps from either the radio or dispatch system.
No one in Ontario does this as far as I know.

Reverse a small portion of your last statement. Driving is a privilege, not a right.

Just wondering what leads you to believe that they have laid the wrong charge? Do you have disclosure yet?

They can ask to amend the charge right up until the trial starts.

Stunt wouldn't be laid. It has to be a "marked departure from the lawful rate of speed"
You indicate that he was going 60 km/h in a 60.
Depending on the circumstances, failing to signal and possibly careless based on the totality of the incident.

The Ontario Drivers handbook is available free online and has some good illustrations of where to stop. The front of the car is to be behind to stop line.
Stopping across the line is a $110.00 fine
Depending on how far after the line she stops, it could also lead to a charge of red light- fail to stop. A $325.00 fine

I don't think a manual would have helped anyway. The one I'm looking st doesn't say how it works, just how to use the product.
How it works is taught in class.

1- That's a Saskatewan case and isn't binding in Ontario at all.
2- It appears that whatever radar they were using, still required the use of tuning forks for testing. (Some brands still do)

Well so far in this thread it was only discussing the Genesis II, of course you don't do a road test on a stationary radar.

The road test is in the manual.

They don't try to amend it before the trial. They simply give the accused notification before they plea that they will be amending it up if they enter a not guilty plea. This also lets the JP know that the accused was fully informed about the possibility of an amendment.

This is from a lengthy thread earlier this year:
http://www ...

The owner of the car can't be charged for this infraction.

It's not a traditional type of fatal error though. In a normal fatal error a JP can look at their copy of the ticket and quash it. Eg. Fine missing, date missing.
There's no way for a JP to know if your copy of the ticket isn't signed. The officer normally removes your ticket from the set after they completed it, sign it, issue it, and then sign ...

Just so you're aware, in most cases, the entire manual is not required to be produced in disclosure. Only the testing procedure. Just because you ask for something doesn't mean you get it. If you don't get it but believe that you require the entire manual, you may have to argue that to the JP and they will decide. Also, if the officer was using the ...

As long as they follow section 142(1) there's nothing illegal about it.

142(1)The driver or operator of a vehicle upon a highway before turning to the left or right at any intersection or into a private road or driveway or from one lane for traffic to another lane for traffic or to leave the roadway shall first see that the movement can be made in ...

Section 19 of Ontario Regulation 668 indicates:
19. The driver of automobile is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile is not at fault for an incident that occurs,

(a) when automobile is backing up;

(b) when automobile is making a U-turn; or

(c) when the driver of, or a passenger in, automobile opens the automobile door or leaves ...

And now Ministry of Finance is also checking for coloured diesel. They also don't need a warrant.