The infraction was during a right turn, onto a major road. This was a T-intersection with two right turn lanes. My vehicle was in the right most lane, and in the lane to my left a Police Officer was making a right turn also. 500m ahead, the officer pulled me over (in a city). It seemed like a long time until he did. (Did the officer deny me a right to find witnesses, by waiting this long to pull me over..?) He said I came into his lane, and also said so in his notes. Charged me with Turn Not in Safety My potential 'defense', is that there were no lines to separate the turning lanes as they curved on a steep and quick angle. Furthermore, a look at google street-view shows the area DID HAVE clear turning lines several years ago. Is there any defense in this? I haven't found anything in the HTA, regarding road maintenance and exemptions. At the very least, I plan on using photos showing no lines to demonstrate the officer couldn't say I was "in his lane" when there were no road lines to use as a basis for such a claim. Thanks in advance for your thoughts, Jay
The infraction was during a right turn, onto a major road. This was a T-intersection with two right turn lanes. My vehicle was in the right most lane, and in the lane to my left a Police Officer was making a right turn also.
500m ahead, the officer pulled me over (in a city). It seemed like a long time until he did. (Did the officer deny me a right to find witnesses, by waiting this long to pull me over..?)
He said I came into his lane, and also said so in his notes. Charged me with Turn Not in Safety
My potential 'defense', is that there were no lines to separate the turning lanes as they curved on a steep and quick angle. Furthermore, a look at google street-view shows the area DID HAVE clear turning lines several years ago. Is there any defense in this? I haven't found anything in the HTA, regarding road maintenance and exemptions.
At the very least, I plan on using photos showing no lines to demonstrate the officer couldn't say I was "in his lane" when there were no road lines to use as a basis for such a claim.
the more appropriate charge imo should have been "Improper Right Turn" contrary to S. 141 (2) http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... uote]Right turn at intersection (2) Where a driver or operator of a vehicle intends to turn to the right into an intersecting highway, he or she shall, where the highway on which he or she is driving has marked lanes for traffic, approach the intersection within the right-hand lane or, where it has no such marked lanes, by keeping immediately to the left of the right curb or edge of the roadway and he or she shall make the right turn by entering the right-hand lane of the intersecting highway where the lane is marked or, where no such lane is marked, by keeping immediately to the left of the right curb or edge of the roadway being entered. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 141 (2).[/quote]if there were no marked lanes and you're in the far right lane - you must turn directly to the left edge of the nearest right curb; but not turning in safety opens a whole can of worms; the officer i feel has overcharged and would have to articulate how your turn was not made in safety i would also like to add that lines painted on Ontario roads are meaningless unless they're accompanied by a posted sign; if there was a sign prior to entering the intersection i would take a look at it ex: http://goo.gl/maps/5buqN (white on black signs) file it for trial and when you receive your notice of trial - request for disclosure
the more appropriate charge imo should have been "Improper Right Turn" contrary to S. 141 (2)
(2) Where a driver or operator of a vehicle intends to turn to the right into an intersecting highway, he or she shall, where the highway on which he or she is driving has marked lanes for traffic, approach the intersection within the right-hand lane or, where it has no such marked lanes, by keeping immediately to the left of the right curb or edge of the roadway and he or she shall make the right turn by entering the right-hand lane of the intersecting highway where the lane is marked or, where no such lane is marked, by keeping immediately to the left of the right curb or edge of the roadway being entered. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 141 (2).[/quote]if there were no marked lanes and you're in the far right lane - you must turn directly to the left edge of the nearest right curb; but not turning in safety opens a whole can of worms; the officer i feel has overcharged and would have to articulate how your turn was not made in safety
i would also like to add that lines painted on Ontario roads are meaningless unless they're accompanied by a posted sign; if there was a sign prior to entering the intersection i would take a look at it
if there were no marked lanes and you're in the far right lane - you must turn directly to the left edge of the nearest right curb; but not turning in safety opens a whole can of worms; the officer i feel has overcharged and would have to articulate how your turn was not made in safety i would also like to add that lines painted on Ontario roads are meaningless unless they're accompanied by a posted sign; if there was a sign prior to entering the intersection i would take a look at it ex: http://goo.gl/maps/5buqN (white on black signs) file it for trial and when you receive your notice of trial - request for disclosure[/quote] Thank you for your kind response. I have a court date booked, have received disclosure, and will work on a defence around what you have said. One more question, when presenting evidence such as a photo, do I need to 'give disclosure' beforehand, or do I just show up to court with copies of the photo for judge, prosecutor, etc. ?
iFly55 wrote:
the more appropriate charge imo should have been "Improper Right Turn" contrary to S. 141 (2)
(2) Where a driver or operator of a vehicle intends to turn to the right into an intersecting highway, he or she shall, where the highway on which he or she is driving has marked lanes for traffic, approach the intersection within the right-hand lane or, where it has no such marked lanes, by keeping immediately to the left of the right curb or edge of the roadway and he or she shall make the right turn by entering the right-hand lane of the intersecting highway where the lane is marked or, where no such lane is marked, by keeping immediately to the left of the right curb or edge of the roadway being entered. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 141 (2).
if there were no marked lanes and you're in the far right lane - you must turn directly to the left edge of the nearest right curb; but not turning in safety opens a whole can of worms; the officer i feel has overcharged and would have to articulate how your turn was not made in safety
i would also like to add that lines painted on Ontario roads are meaningless unless they're accompanied by a posted sign; if there was a sign prior to entering the intersection i would take a look at it
file it for trial and when you receive your notice of trial - request for disclosure[/quote]
Thank you for your kind response. I have a court date booked, have received disclosure, and will work on a defence around what you have said. One more question, when presenting evidence such as a photo, do I need to 'give disclosure' beforehand, or do I just show up to court with copies of the photo for judge, prosecutor, etc. ?
The intersection DOES have turning signs as you have shown in your link. The only lines missing, were curved lines on the turn itself. Does this allow a specific defence? Thanks again!
iFly55 wrote:
i would also like to add that lines painted on Ontario roads are meaningless unless they're accompanied by a posted sign; if there was a sign prior to entering the intersection i would take a look at it
The intersection DOES have turning signs as you have shown in your link. The only lines missing, were curved lines on the turn itself. Does this allow a specific defence?
I just wanted to comment on your thinking the officer waited to pull you over because, in your mind, he was denying you access witnesses... ... LOL. Really? Okay *rolls eyes* the reason for the delay was likely that he was conducting investigative checks on your vehicle, the registered owner, and/or advising his dispatcher that he would be conducting a vehicle stop in the area.
I just wanted to comment on your thinking the officer waited to pull you over because, in your mind, he was denying you access witnesses...
... LOL. Really? Okay *rolls eyes*
the reason for the delay was likely that he was conducting investigative checks on your vehicle, the registered owner, and/or advising his dispatcher that he would be conducting a vehicle stop in the area.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
I don't doubt what you said, but why can't he perform those checks once your vehicle is pulled over? We've all seen dozens of times, officers pull someone over instantly after they observe an infraction - so I don't find your response valid. In general, the officer IS lessening the chance you can find a witness. And not in this case, but sometimes, officers have intentionally abused the system in this way to make their charges stick.
tdottopcop wrote:
I just wanted to comment on your thinking the officer waited to pull you over because, in your mind, he was denying you access witnesses...
... LOL. Really? Okay *rolls eyes*
the reason for the delay was likely that he was conducting investigative checks on your vehicle, the registered owner, and/or advising his dispatcher that he would be conducting a vehicle stop in the area.
I don't doubt what you said, but why can't he perform those checks once your vehicle is pulled over? We've all seen dozens of times, officers pull someone over instantly after they observe an infraction - so I don't find your response valid.
In general, the officer IS lessening the chance you can find a witness. And not in this case, but sometimes, officers have intentionally abused the system in this way to make their charges stick.
I take my time when I pull people over and do the investigative checks BEFORE I stop them for a number of reasons. Namely, I want to know who or what I am stopping BEFORE my eyes are looking down at a screen and not at the potential threat in front of me. And I also want to know who or what I am stopping so I can decide if I need to have other officers present in order for me to conduct the stop safely. For example, let's say I run your licence plate and it comes back to a stolen car. Well, I'm not going to just stop that myself and not notify my dispatcher or have back up in case you drive away, run away or pull out a gun on me. Or, let's say I run your plate and it comes back to information where the owner might be armed with a handgun, is mentally unstable and wants police to shoot him in order to commit suicide. Do I want to stop that care alone? NO. Do I want to know this BEFORE I activate my emergency equipment? YES. Those are both real life, recent, examples in my career by the way. A lot of what is done is done in the name of safety- and 99 times out of 100, the way things are done make everything less efficient and slower and, in your case, make you somehow think we are denying you your ability to retain witnesses- but why would I go to such lengths to make your 'charges stick'? Do I REALLY care about your illegal turn? No. I don't. And neither do other officers at the end of the day. But what we all do care about is our safety.
jk47 wrote:
tdottopcop wrote:
I don't doubt what you said, but why can't he perform those checks once your vehicle is pulled over? We've all seen dozens of times, officers pull someone over instantly after they observe an infraction - so I don't find your response valid.
In general, the officer IS lessening the chance you can find a witness. And not in this case, but sometimes, officers have intentionally abused the system in this way to make their charges stick.
I take my time when I pull people over and do the investigative checks BEFORE I stop them for a number of reasons. Namely, I want to know who or what I am stopping BEFORE my eyes are looking down at a screen and not at the potential threat in front of me.
And I also want to know who or what I am stopping so I can decide if I need to have other officers present in order for me to conduct the stop safely. For example, let's say I run your licence plate and it comes back to a stolen car. Well, I'm not going to just stop that myself and not notify my dispatcher or have back up in case you drive away, run away or pull out a gun on me.
Or, let's say I run your plate and it comes back to information where the owner might be armed with a handgun, is mentally unstable and wants police to shoot him in order to commit suicide. Do I want to stop that care alone? NO. Do I want to know this BEFORE I activate my emergency equipment? YES.
Those are both real life, recent, examples in my career by the way.
A lot of what is done is done in the name of safety- and 99 times out of 100, the way things are done make everything less efficient and slower and, in your case, make you somehow think we are denying you your ability to retain witnesses- but why would I go to such lengths to make your 'charges stick'? Do I REALLY care about your illegal turn? No. I don't. And neither do other officers at the end of the day. But what we all do care about is our safety.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
I'm curious as to exactly how you would "find" a witness? Stop someone driving by at 50 km/h or start approaching pedestrians in the area as the officer writes your ticket? They're not going to stick around.
I'm curious as to exactly how you would "find" a witness? Stop someone driving by at 50 km/h or start approaching pedestrians in the area as the officer writes your ticket? They're not going to stick around.
Years ago, an officer pulled me over for 'running a stop sign on a school bus'. Which as far as I know, is a brutal traffic charge, far worse then just running a stop sign. I was scratching my head because I knew I didn't. He was in the process of writing me a ticket, when the school bus driver herself approached my vehicle and told us both I passed the bus just as the sign went out and it was impossible for me to have seen it. Had she not done so, it would have been my word against the Officer's, with the odds stacked against me. The officer of course withdrew his ticket. Two weeks ago, a vehicle in front of me was pulled over by a Police Radar team for speeding. The thing is, he wasn't speeding because I was going the same speed and it was EXACTLY the speed limit. However an SUV infront of him was going quite fast. I pulled over ahead, and explained this to the officers. They conceded that they may have hit the SUV with the radar instead. I can't speak for you, but I've personally been 'rescued' by a witness, and have been a witness myself. Not saying it's easy to 'find' one, but it can't hurt to try.
Decatur wrote:
I'm curious as to exactly how you would "find" a witness? Stop someone driving by at 50 km/h or start approaching pedestrians in the area as the officer writes your ticket? They're not going to stick around.
Years ago, an officer pulled me over for 'running a stop sign on a school bus'. Which as far as I know, is a brutal traffic charge, far worse then just running a stop sign. I was scratching my head because I knew I didn't. He was in the process of writing me a ticket, when the school bus driver herself approached my vehicle and told us both I passed the bus just as the sign went out and it was impossible for me to have seen it. Had she not done so, it would have been my word against the Officer's, with the odds stacked against me. The officer of course withdrew his ticket.
Two weeks ago, a vehicle in front of me was pulled over by a Police Radar team for speeding. The thing is, he wasn't speeding because I was going the same speed and it was EXACTLY the speed limit. However an SUV infront of him was going quite fast. I pulled over ahead, and explained this to the officers. They conceded that they may have hit the SUV with the radar instead.
I can't speak for you, but I've personally been 'rescued' by a witness, and have been a witness myself. Not saying it's easy to 'find' one, but it can't hurt to try.
Glad you're a good-guy cop who doesn't care if charges stick.... Why do other GTA police officers go to such great lengths to have charges stick? Why did the police officer at my speeding trial, pull me out of the courtroom and try to coerce me into accepting a guilty deal? -then 3 minutes later after whispering to prosecutor, have charges withdrawn? Why did another police officer (in another speeding case), tell me he wasn't going to show up to court, and then shows up with a smirk on his face? Don't trust my word for it? Why is the Ontario Lead Prosecutor currently investigating the broad depth of police deception and lies? http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/arti ... -deception. You don't think that many police officers are driven by career goals and are lacking a moral compass? And I'm glad you're so concerned about your safety. I'm concerned about mine too, and my rights to protection from the police officers who are bad apples.
tdottopcop wrote:
...you somehow think we are denying you your ability to retain witnesses- but why would I go to such lengths to make your 'charges stick'? Do I REALLY care about your illegal turn? No. I don't. And neither do other officers at the end of the day. But what we all do care about is our safety.
Glad you're a good-guy cop who doesn't care if charges stick....
Why do other GTA police officers go to such great lengths to have charges stick?
Why did the police officer at my speeding trial, pull me out of the courtroom and try to coerce me into accepting a guilty deal? -then 3 minutes later after whispering to prosecutor, have charges withdrawn?
Why did another police officer (in another speeding case), tell me he wasn't going to show up to court, and then shows up with a smirk on his face?
Don't trust my word for it? Why is the Ontario Lead Prosecutor currently investigating the broad depth of police deception and lies?
You don't think that many police officers are driven by career goals and are lacking a moral compass?
And I'm glad you're so concerned about your safety. I'm concerned about mine too, and my rights to protection from the police officers who are bad apples.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…
Turn not in Safety - Is this a valid defese?
