I just got into a first accident in 14 years of driving. I hope someone can help me out here... I had just turned right to come out from a plaza. There were no cars around, as I had come out very slowly, and my vehicle was fully out, positioned in the middle of the very right lane. I was still moving slowly, and turned on my left signal, as the very right lane (the lane I was on) was a right turn only lane. Another vehicle that was definitely speeding changed his lane from my left to my lane, and hit me on the left front fender (driver side), pushing my car over to further right sidewalk. The police never came to the scene, and we reported it to the collision centre. The other driver's statement was that I came out from the plaza without looking, and he was traveling on the same right lane. But this wasn't true, as I had already fully come out from the plaza, traveling on the main road at a slower speed, turned on my left signal, trying to see if I can change my lane to the left or not. If he was really driving on the very right lane behind me, he was definitely speeding, because there were no cars nearby when I turned, and he saw me moving slowly, and he tried to pass me by changing his lane to the left, and back to the right to turn right in front of me, and obviously he didn't do a good job doing so, hitting me right on my left fender. As soon as my adjuster heard "PLAZA" I had come out from, he told me I was going to be at 100 % fault. But I had explained to him, I was already fully out, and you can see that in my pictures from the scene. He told me he was going to check to see, but it was most likely to be at my fault because even in the pictures, he can see my car was hit very close to the plaza driveway (close but not on plaza driveway!). I just don't understand, because I had already safely made myself on the main road. The other driver was not only speeding but also changing his lanes from right to left to right again to pass me to make his right turn in front of me, and it would still be at my fault? Does this mean if anybody has come out from a plaza, even if that car is on the main road, you can just go hit it from any direction and it will be at their fault?? : :x :x :x
I just got into a first accident in 14 years of driving. I hope someone can help me out here...
I had just turned right to come out from a plaza. There were no cars around, as I had come out very slowly, and my vehicle was fully out, positioned in the middle of the very right lane. I was still moving slowly, and turned on my left signal, as the very right lane (the lane I was on) was a right turn only lane.
Another vehicle that was definitely speeding changed his lane from my left to my lane, and hit me on the left front fender (driver side), pushing my car over to further right sidewalk. The police never came to the scene, and we reported it to the collision centre.
The other driver's statement was that I came out from the plaza without looking, and he was traveling on the same right lane. But this wasn't true, as I had already fully come out from the plaza, traveling on the main road at a slower speed, turned on my left signal, trying to see if I can change my lane to the left or not. If he was really driving on the very right lane behind me, he was definitely speeding, because there were no cars nearby when I turned, and he saw me moving slowly, and he tried to pass me by changing his lane to the left, and back to the right to turn right in front of me, and obviously he didn't do a good job doing so, hitting me right on my left fender.
As soon as my adjuster heard "PLAZA" I had come out from, he told me I was going to be at 100 % fault. But I had explained to him, I was already fully out, and you can see that in my pictures from the scene. He told me he was going to check to see, but it was most likely to be at my fault because even in the pictures, he can see my car was hit very close to the plaza driveway (close but not on plaza driveway!).
I just don't understand, because I had already safely made myself on the main road. The other driver was not only speeding but also changing his lanes from right to left to right again to pass me to make his right turn in front of me, and it would still be at my fault?
Does this mean if anybody has come out from a plaza, even if that car is on the main road, you can just go hit it from any direction and it will be at their fault?? :
Ontario has fault determination rules. http://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900668 (3) If the incident occurs when automobile "B" is entering a road from a private road or a driveway and automobile "A" is passing the private road or driveway and, if there are no traffic signals or signs, the driver of automobile "A" is not at fault and the driver of automobile "B" is 100 per cent at fault for the incident. (4) If the incident occurs when automobile "B" is changing lanes, the driver of automobile "A" is not at fault and the driver of automobile "B" is 100 per cent at fault for the incident. (3) If the location on the road of automobiles "A" and "B" when the incident (a "sideswipe") occurs cannot be determined, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident. If the other driver is deemed to have made an unsafe lane change then he would be 100 percent at fault. If the other drivers has damage to the rear passenger side corner and yours is front drivers side then then you can argue that he was changing lanes. If you can show that your car was pushed over that suggests he was the one changing lanes. If his damage is to the front then it will look more like he hit you as you pulled out of the plaza making you at fault. If they can't determine what happened fault is 50/50. So basically you have to offer compelling evidence you were already on the roadway to get out of the 100 percent at fault determination. Then offer compelling evidence that the other driver made a lane change and hit you making him 100 percent at fault. If you disagree with the adjusters finding, you can appeal it if you have a strong enough case.
(3) If the incident occurs when automobile "B" is entering a road from a private road or a driveway and automobile "A" is passing the private road or driveway and, if there are no traffic signals or signs, the driver of automobile "A" is not at fault and the driver of automobile "B" is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
(4) If the incident occurs when automobile "B" is changing lanes, the driver of automobile "A" is not at fault and the driver of automobile "B" is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
(3) If the location on the road of automobiles "A" and "B" when the incident (a "sideswipe") occurs cannot be determined, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.
If the other driver is deemed to have made an unsafe lane change then he would be 100 percent at fault. If the other drivers has damage to the rear passenger side corner and yours is front drivers side then then you can argue that he was changing lanes. If you can show that your car was pushed over that suggests he was the one changing lanes. If his damage is to the front then it will look more like he hit you as you pulled out of the plaza making you at fault. If they can't determine what happened fault is 50/50.
So basically you have to offer compelling evidence you were already on the roadway to get out of the 100 percent at fault determination. Then offer compelling evidence that the other driver made a lane change and hit you making him 100 percent at fault. If you disagree with the adjusters finding, you can appeal it if you have a strong enough case.
Thank you so much for your answer. But are the pictures not enough to prove that I was not in a process of exiting a private driveway? My pictures show that I was on the main road when the other driver ran into my left front fender. But the adjuster said I was hit too close to the private driveway. Yes, I was close, because I came out slowly and I was moving very slowly because that lane was right turn only, and I had turned on a left signal. And we certainly had not moved the cars after the collision as they both were not drivable. His right bumper and other parts from underneath had fallen off, all over the place on the ground, and my left front fender was hit and the wheel was stuck.
Thank you so much for your answer.
But are the pictures not enough to prove that I was not in a process of exiting a private driveway?
My pictures show that I was on the main road when the other driver ran into my left front fender. But the adjuster said I was hit too close to the private driveway. Yes, I was close, because I came out slowly and I was moving very slowly because that lane was right turn only, and I had turned on a left signal. And we certainly had not moved the cars after the collision as they both were not drivable. His right bumper and other parts from underneath had fallen off, all over the place on the ground, and my left front fender was hit and the wheel was stuck.
Both parties have different stories about how the accident occurred. The best your provider can do is look over whatever evidence they have, figure out which story makes the most sense, and come to the most logical conclusion based on the Fault Determination Rules. That's the way the cookie crumbles. If you have pictures and a location, feel free to post them.
Both parties have different stories about how the accident occurred. The best your provider can do is look over whatever evidence they have, figure out which story makes the most sense, and come to the most logical conclusion based on the Fault Determination Rules. That's the way the cookie crumbles.
If you have pictures and a location, feel free to post them.
I followed the procedures mentioned in the previous threads regarding the disclosure and received it today. My court date is November 5 2009 in Whitby. After going through the notes I realized 2 things:
1- the notes are horribly illegible and difficult to read
2- I have notes from two different officers.
Now I am not sure if this means that both the officers will be at court for the hearing or…
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS unit I had to rely on the printable poorman's version from Mapquest. I followed Huron Church Rd.,…
Need an expert advice here. 10 days ago I got a speeding ticket. Ticket has a fatal error on its face-offense not known to law. It says speeding 75km/hr in posted 60km/hr zone. What is the best way to proceed?
1. Should I completely ignore this ticket and let the JP to quash it?
2. Should I go with option 3 - request a trial and force the fatal error by not showing up at court?
My name is Brian. I am in my late 20s and live in Toronto. I do not own a car but half a dozen times a year I rent one with my Visa. (To get out of the city and go to a beach or ski for example.)
I have never drunk and drive but I face a problem and Im wondering if anyone can tell me what to do. Several months ago I was at a weekend party and had quit a bit to consume. When I stopped…
I was travelling east bound on ellesmere road and approached markham road attempting to make a right turn. All signal lights were red and cars traveling down markham road south were given the green arrow. I slowed down and attempted to make the right turn. I got ticketed by a cop who was parked in a gas station facing the intersection in a (no parking zone). I…
Crested a hill, officer coming at me, pulled a u turn and pulled me over.
I will go back and look again but I thought I was in an 80 not a 70 and I am positive I wasn't doing more than 120. My speedo read 110-115. I have aftermarket tires and rims so I assume this would be the difference.
It was around 7pm, already dark, nobody on the road but myself,…
I am looking for the case law that is commonly used when the prosecution says they only need to disclose the testing pages of a radar manual or laser manual.
I am only interested in the binding decisions (appeals court or higher?), and not in the non-binding Justice of the Peace decisions.
I was pulled over two nights ago and charged with failing to stop a stop sign. On the ticket, it says 'disobey stop sign - foil to stop' and does not say 'fail' -- something I think may be a fatal flaw? I have been driving for 12 years with no tickets, yet I live in Brampton where insurance prices are high so I do not want to be convicted as my insurance rates will spike significantly and…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
I understand the severity of my offences, and I can't stress how much I regret it. I know I endangered the lives of myself and more importantly others. I usually do not speed and I know running late for work is an unacceptable excuse. I will be a man and accept the consequences of my actions although I would appreciate any advice for my situation.
Guys back in january i got a speeding ticket on dvp, but i am 90% sure he did not caught me on radar, i asked for disclosure request and i just received today, I have asked for: a full copy of the police officers notes, a copy of both sides of the officers copy of the ticket, witness will say statements, speed gun manual, calibration record, repair history and officer's training certificate but…
I need some help here. So today I was on my way to get my tires changed from my winter tires to my regular summer staggered set of tires. I was driving in mississauga on my way to my destination, I got pulled over by an officer where I was given a ticket for having improper mudguards. For some context, I drive a stock 2013 C63 AMG with winter tires at the time. I was never…
I'd like to start this off by saying for the last two weeks I have been browsing the forums. I'm trying to prepare myself for an early resolution meeting with a prosecutor (in Brampton, if that matters). I have a clean record and as a teacher, I always do my best to follow rules (trying to practice what I preach!)
On December 4, 2014 I was preparing to turn right at a very busy intersection.…
I have question, today I was going to work in my normal route there is a triangle intersection with my side being the only one with a stop sign.
There's a car in front me who stopped at the stop sign, and the third-side there's a incoming car with their hazard-light flashing but they don't have stop sign, yet coming in at a slow speed.
Right after the car in front me went through the stop sign,…
On my way to work this morning I received a ticket for disobey sign. I was on Hwy 10 Mississauga in the right lane. The right lane leads to the 401 and there is a sign saying Right Lane Exits. I Tried to merge left before the on ramp as did 3 other people. We all got a ticket for doing that. Is there anything I can do? I did not realize I was breaking any law it was a dotted line where I tried to…
This is my first post, before I jump right in I would like to thank the forum, members, posters and moderators for all the information posted. I feel like I have been able to learn a lot from others experiences, so thank you all.
This will be a lengthy post. But if you are dealing with a Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) - No Straight Through Intersection you may find this extremely…
Let me start this with saying that this isn't in regards to a ticket, more a discussion surrounding front license plates and learning about the rules behind them. (Most of the quote stuff is using colloquial terms, mostly because I couldn't really find a better way to describe it; it's not meant to be offensive.)
I know Ontario law/HTA mandates having a front license plate unlike some States in…
Hi Guys! I've just had my trial day yesterday. I was not at fault but was convicted anyways.
It is such a travesty! There is no justice at the traffic court. It is just a no mercy machine to part someone with his money, no common sense applies and no reasonable argument being considered. Such a shame! The justice, the policeman and the prosecutor ganged up against me. The justice kept interrupting…
Well first of all ... glad to have found the forum - hoping to find answers to 'alot' of questions
I was unfortunate in July 2010 in that I ended up rolling my 2009 Ranger three times, through a fence and landing on the roof on a rained-out road that was/is in need of proper repair in Eastern Ontario.
I was assisted out of the vehicle by the driver who was behind me.
I was traveling down the 401, noticed a speed trap, and started flashing my lights -- in order to warn oncoming drivers.
Within a 30 seconds, a car slowed, crossed the grass, and approached me from behind. Lights appeared, and I then realised that this was an officer in an undercover car.
The officer pulled me over, and while he was polite, clearly his motivation was to…
Does anyone know the specific law, statute, Charter right to refer to when a prosecutor or justice attempts to change the charge on a ticket after a trial has begun? I assume I'd object immediately (without interrupting anyone, of course) but what would be the specific legal basis of my objection?
I was right behind a school bus that looked like it was pulling over to the side in order to turn down a side street, I saw no lights so decided to go around (wide street). Was still moving as I was passing, then as I did pass I heard horn and looked back and in fact it was pulling over to p/u school kids (was a block away from my son's school, so just assumed it wouldn't be picking up kids...it…