I received a letter the other day from a lawyer indicating that his client was making a claim for injuries as a result of a car accident and I should forward the letter to my insurance company so that the matter can be dealt with... I have no idea what he is talking about and so I contact him to find out. Seems my car was being driven by someone and was in an accident. I still have no idea what he is talking about so he emails the Accident Report. Sure enough, that's my car's plate number and that's my car... but insurance information was provided. which is odd because the registration and pink slip are kept together in the car. So why one and not the other? it was a rear end collision on the QEW and one would think that if there was sufficient suggestion of injury to the other driver to interest a lawyer, that there should be some visible damage to both vehicles; I would think the airbags on the following vehicle would have deployed as well. The problem is that the car listed on the accident report is sitting in the driveway right now and just fine. with the rust and bubbled paint still very much in place (sadly). No dents, no airbag deployment, and not possible it was involved in an accident on the QEW. But it's the vehicle named in the accident report and so I'm the guy he's coming after... The Accident Report is a legal document I think so one would expect the information to be accurate, and that is enough for the lawyer it seems. What I don't understand is how my vehicle got on the report in the first place. Although I have no way to prove it, the car was 30 miles away at the time of the accident. Any suggestions here would be appreciated.
I received a letter the other day from a lawyer indicating that his client was making a claim for injuries as a result of a car accident and I should forward the letter to my insurance company so that the matter can be dealt with... I have no idea what he is talking about and so I contact him to find out. Seems my car was being driven by someone and was in an accident. I still have no idea what he is talking about so he emails the Accident Report.
Sure enough, that's my car's plate number and that's my car... but insurance information was provided. which is odd because the registration and pink slip are kept together in the car. So why one and not the other?
it was a rear end collision on the QEW and one would think that if there was sufficient suggestion of injury to the other driver to interest a lawyer, that there should be some visible damage to both vehicles; I would think the airbags on the following vehicle would have deployed as well. The problem is that the car listed on the accident report is sitting in the driveway right now and just fine. with the rust and bubbled paint still very much in place (sadly). No dents, no airbag deployment, and not possible it was involved in an accident on the QEW.
But it's the vehicle named in the accident report and so I'm the guy he's coming after...
The Accident Report is a legal document I think so one would expect the information to be accurate, and that is enough for the lawyer it seems. What I don't understand is how my vehicle got on the report in the first place. Although I have no way to prove it, the car was 30 miles away at the time of the accident.
So I assuming the accident report was given by the other person, claiming there was some kind of accident? Was there any proof of an accident (pics/video) other than this persons word? What part of your vehicle supposedly hit the other vehicle? Anyway I would definitely contact your insurance company right away and then ask them how to proceed and if you should call police to come and view your car. And if you are saying your car was definitely not involved, then this would be insurance fraud so the insurance company and police will probably need to get involved.
So I assuming the accident report was given by the other person, claiming there was some kind of accident? Was there any proof of an accident (pics/video) other than this persons word?
What part of your vehicle supposedly hit the other vehicle?
Anyway I would definitely contact your insurance company right away and then ask them how to proceed and if you should call police to come and view your car. And if you are saying your car was definitely not involved, then this would be insurance fraud so the insurance company and police will probably need to get involved.
no... the driver gave a statement. it was a rear end collision and the police attended. I'm assuming the police charged the driver with following too closely and would have the VIN on the ticket... Unless the driver failed to produce in which case he would be further charged with driving without proof of insurance at least... My guess is though that the charge is protected by privacy legislation so is unavailable. I don't think it is fraud at all... I think someone entered the wrong plate # and it spit out my car. Definately don't want to talk to my insurance company... they'll raise my rates just for bothering them.... hehehe... My issue is that the HTA charge would probably have more accurate information than that collected at the reporting centre. Other than pointing out that the car has obviously NOT been in an accident, I don't know how to go about correcting the error
no... the driver gave a statement. it was a rear end collision and the police attended. I'm assuming the police charged the driver with following too closely and would have the VIN on the ticket... Unless the driver failed to produce in which case he would be further charged with driving without proof of insurance at least... My guess is though that the charge is protected by privacy legislation so is unavailable. I don't think it is fraud at all... I think someone entered the wrong plate # and it spit out my car.
Definately don't want to talk to my insurance company... they'll raise my rates just for bothering them.... hehehe...
My issue is that the HTA charge would probably have more accurate information than that collected at the reporting centre.
Other than pointing out that the car has obviously NOT been in an accident, I don't know how to go about correcting the error
One type of fraud is when people find a car matching their car. They then create plates with your registration but put it on their, identical car. This can resuot in tolls and photo infractions coming to you or even, as may be the case here, collision related claims.
One type of fraud is when people find a car matching their car. They then create plates with your registration but put it on their, identical car. This can resuot in tolls and photo infractions coming to you or even, as may be the case here, collision related claims.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
^^^^^^^^ this, we used to call it cloning, canuks call it the same ?
argyll wrote:
One type of fraud is when people find a car matching their car. They then create plates with your registration but put it on their, identical car. This can resuot in tolls and photo infractions coming to you or even, as may be the case here, collision related claims.
^^^^^^^^ this, we used to call it cloning, canuks call it the same ?
--------------------------------------------------------------
* NO you cant touch your phone
* Speeding is speeding
* Challenge every ticket
* Impaired driving, you should be locked up UNDER the jail
in the UK, many many years ago I was hit in my company car by a car that turned out to be cloned car reg and details had been taken from a car which was just sitting in somone drive not in use
in the UK, many many years ago I was hit in my company car by a car that turned out to be cloned
car reg and details had been taken from a car which was just sitting in somone drive not in use
argyll wrote:
One type of fraud is when people find a car matching their car. They then create plates with your registration but put it on their, identical car. This can resuot in tolls and photo infractions coming to you or even, as may be the case here, collision related claims.
--------------------------------------------------------------
* NO you cant touch your phone
* Speeding is speeding
* Challenge every ticket
* Impaired driving, you should be locked up UNDER the jail
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…
