Hey Guys I was hoping you can help me out here. I was charged with having open alcohol in my car. The only problem is that I wasn't even drinking or anything like that. I had empty bottles on the passenger side floor and I had my cousin sitting on the seat, and one bottle had a little bit left in it, maybe 1/4 inside. The cop still gave me a ticket for it. I don't mind paying the 215.00 fine but I was wondering if I should fight it or not? I wanted to know also if there were any demerit points associated to this fine/ticket? Thanks again for your help.
Hey Guys I was hoping you can help me out here. I was charged with having open alcohol in my car. The only problem is that I wasn't even drinking or anything like that. I had empty bottles on the passenger side floor and I had my cousin sitting on the seat, and one bottle had a little bit left in it, maybe 1/4 inside. The cop still gave me a ticket for it. I don't mind paying the 215.00 fine but I was wondering if I should fight it or not? I wanted to know also if there were any demerit points associated to this fine/ticket?
All you do is trial version (3) When you say not guilty they will drop it. If they don't drop they have to show some evidence,I doubt if there is anything left in that part bottle. Good luck Cheers Viper1
Omesh wrote:
Hey Guys I was hoping you can help me out here. I was charged with having open alcohol in my car. The only problem is that I wasn't even drinking or anything like that. I had empty bottles on the passenger side floor and I had my cousin sitting on the seat, and one bottle had a little bit left in it, maybe 1/4 inside. The cop still gave me a ticket for it. I don't mind paying the 215.00 fine but I was wondering if I should fight it or not? I wanted to know also if there were any demerit points associated to this fine/ticket?
Thanks again for your help.
All you do is trial version (3)
When you say not guilty they will drop it.
If they don't drop they have to show some evidence,I doubt if there is anything left in that part bottle.
Good luck
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
other than a fail to surrender charge, open liquor is very easy offence to prove in court. Located a open 341ml bottle of Coors Light. I observed 1cm depth of beer in bottle. No demerit points for a LLA offence.
other than a fail to surrender charge, open liquor is very easy offence to prove in court. Located a open 341ml bottle of Coors Light. I observed 1cm depth of beer in bottle.
No demerit points for a LLA offence.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Do you have to provide the open liquor(evidence?) I never tried but to me it seems easy to beat. Cheers Stripe
hwybear wrote:
other than a fail to surrender charge, open liquor is very easy offence to prove in court. Located a open 341ml bottle of Coors Light. I observed 1cm depth of beer in bottle.
No demerit points for a LLA offence.
Do you have to provide the open liquor(evidence?)
I never tried but to me it seems easy to beat.
Cheers
Stripe
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
Do you have to provide the open liquor(evidence?) I never tried but to me it seems easy to beat. Cheers Stripe I have never had to produce the alcohol. Again a very easy charge to prove in court. GS
viper1 wrote:
hwybear wrote:
other than a fail to surrender charge, open liquor is very easy offence to prove in court. Located a open 341ml bottle of Coors Light. I observed 1cm depth of beer in bottle.
No demerit points for a LLA offence.
Do you have to provide the open liquor(evidence?)
I never tried but to me it seems easy to beat.
Cheers
Stripe
I have never had to produce the alcohol. Again a very easy charge to prove in court.
Some HTA/LLA offences are extremely easy to prove, and this is one of them. The standard for conviction is that the officer observed a container of alcohol in the passenger compartment that was open... and that's it. Given the situation, I'd suggest either plea-bargaining or just paying it.
Some HTA/LLA offences are extremely easy to prove, and this is one of them. The standard for conviction is that the officer observed a container of alcohol in the passenger compartment that was open... and that's it. Given the situation, I'd suggest either plea-bargaining or just paying it.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Not trien to pick on yah hwybear But how your saying it is beer make it beer? Cheers Viper1
hwybear wrote:
other than a fail to surrender charge, open liquor is very easy offence to prove in court. Located a open 341ml bottle of Coors Light. I observed 1cm depth of beer in bottle.
No demerit points for a LLA offence.
Not trien to pick on yah hwybear
But how your saying it is beer make it beer?
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
yeah...your pickin on me and I'm tellin "admin, Viper1 is pickin on me :!: Like everyone else (inlcuding you :wink: ) when someone hands me a beer, I know it's a beer. The can/bottle. Other than cigarettes and bottle caps inside, I've never seen anything else inside a bottle/can. Everyone knows the colour, smell (fresh or raunchy stale). Someone hands you a beer at an event that your not familiar with, most of us, look at label, hmm interesting and then try it. Some I have tried have been beer, but certainly could peel paint off the wall they taste so bad, but still same good ole smell.
yeah...your pickin on me and I'm tellin "admin, Viper1 is pickin on me
Like everyone else (inlcuding you ) when someone hands me a beer, I know it's a beer. The can/bottle. Other than cigarettes and bottle caps inside, I've never seen anything else inside a bottle/can. Everyone knows the colour, smell (fresh or raunchy stale). Someone hands you a beer at an event that your not familiar with, most of us, look at label, hmm interesting and then try it. Some I have tried have been beer, but certainly could peel paint off the wall they taste so bad, but still same good ole smell.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Do you not need to produce the evidence? They said it was 1/4 bottle, how would the officer preserve the evidence? Or even to prove it is beer?(it might smell different after 5-6 months) Do they bring the bottle to court? From what has been said so far it sounds as if verbal word convicts? I think a whiskey bottle would be easy but a part bottle of beer not so easy. P.S. where does returning empties fit in? It just makes me wonder if it is cut and dried or the person just pays and moves on. Cheers Viper1
hwybear wrote:
yeah...your pickin on me and I'm tellin "admin, Viper1 is pickin on me
Like everyone else (inlcuding you ) when someone hands me a beer, I know it's a beer. The can/bottle. Other than cigarettes and bottle caps inside, I've never seen anything else inside a bottle/can. Everyone knows the colour, smell (fresh or raunchy stale). Someone hands you a beer at an event that your not familiar with, most of us, look at label, hmm interesting and then try it. Some I have tried have been beer, but certainly could peel paint off the wall they taste so bad, but still same good ole smell.
Do you not need to produce the evidence?
They said it was 1/4 bottle, how would the officer preserve the evidence?
Or even to prove it is beer?(it might smell different after 5-6 months)
Do they bring the bottle to court?
From what has been said so far it sounds as if verbal word convicts?
I think a whiskey bottle would be easy but a part bottle of beer not so easy.
P.S. where does returning empties fit in?
It just makes me wonder if it is cut and dried or the person just pays and moves on.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
They're supposed to be in the trunk, or otherwise out of the passenger compartment (e.g. could carry them in the flatbed area on a pickup truck).
viper1 wrote:
P.S. where does returning empties fit in?
They're supposed to be in the trunk, or otherwise out of the passenger compartment (e.g. could carry them in the flatbed area on a pickup truck).
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Some officers seize the alcohol, seal it and lodge in property vault. Others just dump at roadside and give empties back to owner. In my beginning years I brought a case of beer and partial open to court, JP looked at me like I had screws loose, have never brought alcohol to court again. Never had problem with conviction. Verbal word convicts - same as every other trial...fail to surrender documents, speeding etc.
viper1 wrote:
Do you not need to produce the evidence?
They said it was 1/4 bottle, how would the officer preserve the evidence?
Or even to prove it is beer?(it might smell different after 5-6 months)
Do they bring the bottle to court?
From what has been said so far it sounds as if verbal word convicts?
Viper1
Some officers seize the alcohol, seal it and lodge in property vault. Others just dump at roadside and give empties back to owner.
In my beginning years I brought a case of beer and partial open to court, JP looked at me like I had screws loose, have never brought alcohol to court again. Never had problem with conviction.
Verbal word convicts - same as every other trial...fail to surrender documents, speeding etc.
Last edited by hwybear on Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Verbal word convicts - same as every other trial...fail to surrender documents, speeding etc. 1. No physical evidence needed for those.(hard goods from defense) 2. Man I would have paid to see you lugging in a case of opened beer to court. :lol: 3. If the beer was poured out it probably meant the OP admitted to it.(as 1/4 beer) It is too bad ,in my eyes the OP did not drink (probably designated driver) and still got a fine. Cheers Viper1
Verbal word convicts - same as every other trial...fail to surrender documents, speeding etc.
1. No physical evidence needed for those.(hard goods from defense)
2. Man I would have paid to see you lugging in a case of opened beer to court.
3. If the beer was poured out it probably meant the OP admitted to it.(as 1/4 beer) It is too bad ,in my eyes the OP did not drink (probably designated driver) and still got a fine.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…