I was driving a borrowed van on the 401 southbound toward Toronto. Was stopped because officer thought he saw me using a device. I wasn't, it was a coffee. After providing ownership and the insurance slip, the officer noted the slip had expired. It wasn't my van, I had my own proof of insurance but was told it wasn't useful for the borrowed van. I was issued a $60 (or $50?) fine and could fight it in Brockville but I chose to go and pay it in Ottawa where I live. The owner was insured and just hadn't replaced the paper in the van that he rarely drives, I was insured as mentioned. I thought it was all water under the bridge, he even gave me $60 to cover the fine! A super great guy. Fast forward to today while speaking to my insurance agent, my rates are being raised because of it by almost $200 per year. I have no other records or tickets on there at all. My insurance agent told me I could try to speak to the MTO about it to have it removed but I don't have a clue where I can start. Somehow seems so unreasonable a punishment for something that ultimately wasn't for my car or reflective of my insurance. An thoughts? Appreciated and hello! :)
I was driving a borrowed van on the 401 southbound toward Toronto. Was stopped because officer thought he saw me using a device. I wasn't, it was a coffee. After providing ownership and the insurance slip, the officer noted the slip had expired. It wasn't my van, I had my own proof of insurance but was told it wasn't useful for the borrowed van. I was issued a $60 (or $50?) fine and could fight it in Brockville but I chose to go and pay it in Ottawa where I live. The owner was insured and just hadn't replaced the paper in the van that he rarely drives, I was insured as mentioned. I thought it was all water under the bridge, he even gave me $60 to cover the fine! A super great guy.
Fast forward to today while speaking to my insurance agent, my rates are being raised because of it by almost $200 per year. I have no other records or tickets on there at all. My insurance agent told me I could try to speak to the MTO about it to have it removed but I don't have a clue where I can start.
Somehow seems so unreasonable a punishment for something that ultimately wasn't for my car or reflective of my insurance.
Failure to provide proof of insurance will indeed raise your rates if your provider chooses to do so. It falls into the minor bracket, meaning it's treated no different than your average speeding ticket or most tickets your average driver will encounter while driving. The key thing point here is your failure to do so "upon the demand of a police officer." You were not charged with not having insurance. You were charged for not providing evidence of insurance when asked, regardless of whether you were insured or not. As the driver, you are responsible regardless of who owns the vehicle. In the end, it would be irrelevant if the driver is insured, if the owner was insured, if it was the old slip, etc. They don't relate to the charge. They demanded and unfortunately you could not provide. Sometimes you can schedule an early resolution meeting, show the current insurance slip, and they might let it slide. They are certainly under no obligation to do so. In the end, it's not proof against the charge. You have already plead guilty to the charge on your own, so there isn't much you can do about it at this point apart from waiting it out.
Failure to provide proof of insurance will indeed raise your rates if your provider chooses to do so. It falls into the minor bracket, meaning it's treated no different than your average speeding ticket or most tickets your average driver will encounter while driving.
The key thing point here is your failure to do so "upon the demand of a police officer."
You were not charged with not having insurance. You were charged for not providing evidence of insurance when asked, regardless of whether you were insured or not.
As the driver, you are responsible regardless of who owns the vehicle. In the end, it would be irrelevant if the driver is insured, if the owner was insured, if it was the old slip, etc. They don't relate to the charge. They demanded and unfortunately you could not provide.
Sometimes you can schedule an early resolution meeting, show the current insurance slip, and they might let it slide. They are certainly under no obligation to do so. In the end, it's not proof against the charge.
You have already plead guilty to the charge on your own, so there isn't much you can do about it at this point apart from waiting it out.
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly…
I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction to track down various radar gun error codes.
Way back in March of this year I was stopped for speeding, 86kmh in a 60 Community Safety Zone, on Mayfield Rd., on the outskirts of Brampton. (Aloa school)
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a…
Hey guys I was hoping for some advice on my first ever ticket.
I just moved to the Aurora area and made a prohibited left turn between the prohibited hours. This is my very first ticket so I am unsure as to how to precede. I have already requested and received my court date and I assume the next…
i am 25 with a G2 Drivers license. had a lot to drink saturday night. woke up the next morning and drove home around 1pm sunday. got pulled over for speeding, police officer smelled booze had me blow a breathalyzer. i blew 0.035 . he aloud my passenger to drive my truck home. he gave…
Hi, last summer I was pulled over when I made a left turn from he middle lane at Harbor and Yonge Street (heading east on the Gardiner and taking the Yonge exit). I swear they nabbed about 10 people in 5 minutes. Anyways, I decided to challenge in court, my court date is in April and I have just…
In Kanda, the court established that this offence is a strict liability charge. In other words, you can offer a defence of due diligence. In Kanda the defendant explained the…
Last July I got pulled over for failure to obey stop sign at a T-intersection in my neighbourhood. After I got my trial date I requested disclosure in November. Sent in another request for disclosure in early January and in mid-January got a call to pick it up at the court office. The disclosure…