Here is the problem. My driver was involved in a personal injury accident which sent him to hospital with severe injuries(Ruptured Bowel ans shock) He wa given Morphine and IV and eventually 2 blood transfusions.Sometime later in the night the police officer attended at intensive care and issued him with a traffic summons in relation to the accident under HTA .This occured on Aug 23 2009 and as of today the summons has not been filed with the court as well as no accident report has been completed. This is a long time and no co-operation yet in getting things looked after. Am i right in stating that the officer has 90 days to submit the charges as well as 7 days to submit report to registrar. Any suggestions appreciated and I can provide more inf if required. Thanks
Here is the problem.
My driver was involved in a personal injury accident which sent him to hospital with severe injuries(Ruptured Bowel ans shock) He wa given Morphine and IV and eventually 2 blood transfusions.Sometime later in the night the police officer attended at intensive care and issued him with a traffic summons in relation to the accident under HTA .This occured on Aug 23 2009 and as of today the summons has not been filed with the court as well as no accident report has been completed.
This is a long time and no co-operation yet in getting things looked after.
Am i right in stating that the officer has 90 days to submit the charges as well as 7 days to submit report to registrar.
Any suggestions appreciated and I can provide more inf if required.
It is 10 days. I file it in my sergeants tray, who reviews it, approves and moves it to another area for our stenos to file it. I know they are all filed within our office. If someone wants a copy they call the office and speak to our stenos, which usually involves sending in a fee to obtain the report. There will be a date on the summons when the court is and all disclosure will at the court on that date.
grizz001 wrote:
well as 7 days to submit report to registrar.
It is 10 days.
I file it in my sergeants tray, who reviews it, approves and moves it to another area for our stenos to file it. I know they are all filed within our office. If someone wants a copy they call the office and speak to our stenos, which usually involves sending in a fee to obtain the report.
There will be a date on the summons when the court is and all disclosure will at the court on that date.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
That is one of the problems.The seargeant in charge of detachment wants driver to email officer with cc to sergeant (To light a fire under his but to get it done.) What about serving him in intensive care can you comment on this please. Thanks
That is one of the problems.The seargeant in charge of detachment wants driver to email officer with cc to sergeant (To light a fire under his but to get it done.)
What about serving him in intensive care can you comment on this please.
When an officer issues a regular ticket (Part 1 of the Provincial Offences Act) he/she has 7 days to file it with the court. If it is not filed within that time, the ticket is null & void and if the officer wants to proceed with the charge it must be reissued under Part 3 of the Provincial offences Act. This would be a summons that would have a court date on it. If there is no information filed with the court the charge is null and void. A part 1 ticket is the usual type of ticket issued for a traffic offence and it will have a fine written on it. A part 3 summons will not have a fine amount, but will have a court date. I'm not sure which one your driver received but if you can supply more info I can better advise what will take place.
When an officer issues a regular ticket (Part 1 of the Provincial Offences Act) he/she has 7 days to file it with the court. If it is not filed within that time, the ticket is null & void and if the officer wants to proceed with the charge it must be reissued under Part 3 of the Provincial offences Act. This would be a summons that would have a court date on it. If there is no information filed with the court the charge is null and void.
A part 1 ticket is the usual type of ticket issued for a traffic offence and it will have a fine written on it. A part 3 summons will not have a fine amount, but will have a court date.
I'm not sure which one your driver received but if you can supply more info I can better advise what will take place.
HI Mark Tanks for your reply.The ticket is part 1 with a total fine of 110.00. Charge under sec.141 (5) HTA issued on 09-08-290 10.50pm. Still has not been filed with court. Also no accident report completed to date.(How much time does the officer have to submit the accident report???) The officer avised my driver that charges were pending against the other driver for improper lane change.There was also evidence that the other driver had been drinking but no samples were taken she was coming back fom a wedding. Can you give me the link to provincial offences act re 7 days .I checked and can not find it.Maybto early for me lol. Thank's for your help. Much appreciated
HI Mark
Tanks for your reply.The ticket is part 1 with a total fine of 110.00. Charge under sec.141 (5) HTA issued on 09-08-290 10.50pm.
Still has not been filed with court.
Also no accident report completed to date.(How much time does the officer have to submit the accident report???)
The officer avised my driver that charges were pending against the other driver for improper lane change.There was also evidence that the other driver had been drinking but no samples were taken she was coming back fom a wedding.
Can you give me the link to provincial offences act re 7 days .I checked and can not find it.Maybto early for me lol.
Section 4 of the Provincial Offences Act says that the Certificate (ticket) shall be filed in the office of the court as soon as is practicable after service of the offence notice or summons. Regulation 200 of the POA, Rule #11 says The clerk of the court shall not accept for filing a certificate of offence more than seven days after the day on which the offence notice or summons was served unless the time is extended by the court. There is no reason for the court to extend the time in this matter, unless there are unusual circumstances that I am unaware of.
Section 4 of the Provincial Offences Act says that the Certificate (ticket) shall be filed in the office of the court as soon as is practicable after service of the offence notice or summons.
Regulation 200 of the POA, Rule #11 says The clerk of the court shall not accept for filing a certificate of offence more than seven days after the day on which the offence notice or summons was served unless the time is extended by the court.
There is no reason for the court to extend the time in this matter, unless there are unusual circumstances that I am unaware of.
It is a sad day when one has to serve a person with life threatning injuries in intensive care.Wow just a matter of getting it done in my opinion wrong.
hwybear wrote:
Serving a ticket(s) or summon(s) on a person who is in the hospital is common.
It is a sad day when one has to serve a person with life threatning injuries in intensive care.Wow just a matter of getting it done in my opinion wrong.
most times the injured person is not from the area that the officer patrols. Once they are released from hospital they do not call the police to ask for a ticket. The only other option is having another agency serve the person at their residence with a summons. The summons involves a lot of paperwork (stenos, swearing to informations, relaying summons, service of summons, swearing to summons, return of summons) The summons is mandatory court appearance, where a ticket is not. The easist and most economical way for all is to serve the person a ticket at the hospital. The person does not have a mandatory court date. The ticket has a "set fine", where a summons can be much higher for the same offence.
most times the injured person is not from the area that the officer patrols. Once they are released from hospital they do not call the police to ask for a ticket.
The only other option is having another agency serve the person at their residence with a summons. The summons involves a lot of paperwork (stenos, swearing to informations, relaying summons, service of summons, swearing to summons, return of summons) The summons is mandatory court appearance, where a ticket is not.
The easist and most economical way for all is to serve the person a ticket at the hospital. The person does not have a mandatory court date. The ticket has a "set fine", where a summons can be much higher for the same offence.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
The scarcasim not appreciated.He did not hurt himself.He was almost killed, lives in the same area the Police officer patrols.just could not wait a couple days wow what serve him before he dies is that what you are stating???? A traffic offence not murder. Unfortunatly I can not comment on the full story in ref: to the officer. I joined this forum for information non bias at that.Just wanted the opinion of some of the pro's. Thank You
Squishy wrote:
Just because they hurt themselves does not mean the law no longer applies.
The scarcasim not appreciated.He did not hurt himself.He was almost killed, lives in the same area the Police officer patrols.just could not wait a couple days wow what serve him before he dies is that what you are stating????
A traffic offence not murder.
Unfortunatly I can not comment on the full story in ref: to the officer.
I joined this forum for information non bias at that.Just wanted the opinion of some of the pro's.
Thanks for your reply.My point is not that the law no longer applies.A bit of descression in this case would have been waranted.The driver lives in this area and there would have been no problem with him being served after he recovered.Certainly had enough time.
Squishy wrote:
There was no sarcasm in my post. I'll rephrase: Just because he was hurt does not mean the law no longer applies.
Thanks for your reply.My point is not that the law no longer applies.A bit of descression in this case would have been waranted.The driver lives in this area and there would have been no problem with him being served after he recovered.Certainly had enough time.
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS…
In June at 401 London and Wellington I got hit twice, speeding which I didn't realize I was doing and cell phone. The Officer made me open my purse and show him my phone. I was going to meet a Rep of my Company in Kitchener, he called I answered. WRONG! The Officer wasn't even nice. My record…
I'm going to preface this with a little concern....I know that at least one moderator on this forum is likely a co-worker of the officer who tagged me. I'm hoping that by being involved here, this moderator is already acting unbiased towards incidents he/she is not directly involved in. Also…
I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ?
Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example :
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could…
I got a ticket for going 20 km/h over 50 in Toronto around March of last year and received my court summons for a hearing in February 2012 approx. 3 weeks ago. Mailed out a request for disclosure a week after that. It's now been 2 and a 1/2 weeks since the request and I was…