Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

Can the HTA be enforced in a mall parking lot
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:05 pm
Posts: 94
I have searched and I know the general rule is no, barring criminal charges or tresspassing. So let me use 2 specific issues I have.

1) I have some business in some area malls after hours. Once I have pulled into the mall lot on the way to the closest door I rarely stop at stop signs unless there is a car or person nearby. (i do not carelessly speed, i do show caution, just do not fully stop) Can a police officer charge me with an offence under the HTA? Worse case senario If a collision occurs it will be 50/50 whether I stop or not right?

2) At night during the first few snowfalls I sometimes use a large lot at Ikea or scotiabank place to brush up on my winter driving skills. This is done only when NO cars or persons are nearby. I drive slowly in a zigzag and go back over my tracks increasing speed to see how well I can control. Or drive strait and put my car in a skid and try to recover it. Can I be charged with an offence under HTA? I know I am responsible if damages occur. and property owners may call police for a tresspass charge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:19 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
Posts: 1490
Location: somewhere in traffic
1) I have some business in some area malls after hours. Once I have pulled into the mall lot on the way to the closest door I rarely stop at stop signs unless there is a car or person nearby. (i do not carelessly speed, i do show caution, just do not fully stop) Can a police officer charge me with an offence under the HTA? Worse case senario If a collision occurs it will be 50/50 whether I stop or not right? -----HTA is for roads only------Parking lots are private property.....


2) At night during the first few snowfalls I sometimes use a large lot at Ikea or scotiabank place to brush up on my winter driving skills. This is done only when NO cars or persons are nearby. I drive slowly in a zigzag and go back over my tracks increasing speed to see how well I can control. Or drive strait and put my car in a skid and try to recover it. Can I be charged with an offence under HTA? I know I am responsible if damages occur. and property owners may call police for a tresspass charge.-------you could be charged criminally like you said before, but not under the HTA........

_________________
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:54 pm 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 354
Plus insurance blame is different than HTA blame. You can be sure that if you are not stopping at a stop sign and cause a collision you may not get a ticket. But the report will reflect that you are clearly at fault. In my experience you will be blamed fully for the collisions.( this is from a personal collision I had in PVt property. Other guy did not stop and was held 100% responsible by the insurance companies.

OPScopper


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:16 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Posts: 2933
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
Reflections wrote:
1) I have some business in some area malls after hours. Once I have pulled into the mall lot on the way to the closest door I rarely stop at stop signs unless there is a car or person nearby. (i do not carelessly speed, i do show caution, just do not fully stop) Can a police officer charge me with an offence under the HTA? Worse case senario If a collision occurs it will be 50/50 whether I stop or not right? -----HTA is for roads only------Parking lots are private property.....

since I don't have any private property areas....would city bylaws not be applicable? similiar to no parking in fire route?

_________________
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Jr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:05 pm
Posts: 94
OPS Copper wrote:
Plus insurance blame is different than HTA blame. You can be sure that if you are not stopping at a stop sign and cause a collision you may not get a ticket. But the report will reflect that you are clearly at fault. In my experience you will be blamed fully for the collisions.( this is from a personal collision I had in PVt property. Other guy did not stop and was held 100% responsible by the insurance companies.

OPScopper


this is news to me. my sister was in a parking lot and some guy backed out of a spot and hit the side of the car. He intended to pay for damages but couldn't so the insurance got involved and told my sis that all parking lot accidents are 50/50 when both vehicles are moving. If one is parked than the moving vehicle is 100%.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:14 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
The best thing to do is check out the Ontario Fault Determination Rules.

They are convoluted, weird, and at times completely contradict the HTA. Couple of examples:

- You're in the right lane minding your business. Driver roars up behind you, slices around you, cuts inches in front of your bumper and plows on the brakes. You rear-end him. He gets charged with all kinds of offences under the HTA, but according to insurance you are 100% at fault. :shock:
- You are driving down the road at the speed limit and a pedestrian suddenly leaps in front of your car outside of a crosswalk. Pedestrian gets charged, but according to insurance you are 100% at fault. :shock:

Marquisse has training in the Fault Determination Rules, she'd be able to tell you more...

_________________
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:11 pm 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 354
That is what I meant by Insurance blame. I Just could not remember what it was called.

Insurance world is weird. All I can say is what happened to me. I was in my own vehicle on Carleton Campus and guy runs a stop sign. He was blamed for collision and I paid no part of my deductible. So based on that he was at fault.

OPS copper


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:48 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
OPS Copper wrote:
I was in my own vehicle on Carleton Campus and guy runs a stop sign.


Ah yes, driving around my alma mater... doesn't surprise me that happened. When I was at Carleton (graduated in 2003) people blew stop signs, charged at pedestrians in crosswalks, cut each other off and ripped around campus like demented kamikazes. :shock:

_________________
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 139
beleafer81 wrote:
OPS Copper wrote:
Plus insurance blame is different than HTA blame. You can be sure that if you are not stopping at a stop sign and cause a collision you may not get a ticket. But the report will reflect that you are clearly at fault. In my experience you will be blamed fully for the collisions.( this is from a personal collision I had in PVt property. Other guy did not stop and was held 100% responsible by the insurance companies.

OPScopper


this is news to me. my sister was in a parking lot and some guy backed out of a spot and hit the side of the car. He intended to pay for damages but couldn't so the insurance got involved and told my sis that all parking lot accidents are 50/50 when both vehicles are moving. If one is parked than the moving vehicle is 100%.


Beleafer81,

According to s.s.7(2) of the Fault Determination Rules, your sister, being automobile "A" in this scenario, is not at fault. The fault lies 100% with automobile "B".

Racer, I finally emailed you the Fault Determination Rules that I promised you in December. Sorry for the delay - I completely forgot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:29 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 139
Vehicles are always at fault according to the Fault Determination Rules when a pedestrian is hit, whether or not the pedestrian was at fault. I wish there was something Joe/Jane Public could do to fight the insurance companies at this because it is utterly wrong. The HTA charge should correspond to the FSCO determination, especially in cases like this example. This is a bass ackwards system and its non-sensical
(if your common-sense is fairness based), and it is patently unfair to us. They only hold the driver responsible because a pedestrian has no insurance, imo, and therefore, no big money backing him/her up.

People in class were LOLing at me and a couple other students because we were bursting capillaries learning this stuff. It's infuriating how we have to bend over for big insurance while the government holds us down and won't even provide us with the industry equivalent of vaseline to make it hurt a little less. :x


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:38 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
Marquisse wrote:
This is a bass ackwards system and its non-sensical
(if your common-sense is fairness based), and it is patently unfair to us.


I couldn't agree more.

Marquisse wrote:
They only hold the driver responsible because a pedestrian has no insurance, imo, and therefore, no big money backing him/her up.


That's the big problem... seems like the Fault Determination Rules were set up to save the insurance companies the most amount of money by requiring the least amount of work... and give them an excuse to jack up rates whenever possible. One of my friends was approaching a green light, large transport truck waiting to turn left was blocking his view to the left, truck lays on the horn for no apparent reason, so he starts to slow down, and a woman steps into the crosswalk from in front of the truck. He attempted to swerve but his mirror slapped the woman at 50 km/h. She was charged with a couple of offences, he wasn't charged, but his insurance went up by $1000 a year. :evil:

Marquisse wrote:
People in class were LOLing at me and a couple other students because we were bursting capillaries learning this stuff.


Well you did better than I would, I'd have blown an artery.

_________________
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Parking in A fire route ticket in a empty mall at 12am

magic_black

12

1962

Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:26 pm

Mac004 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 144(18) changed to HTA 130, is that allowed?

kooler

3

1030

Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:13 pm

ticketcombat View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Charged with wrong offence: HTA 62(11) instead of HTA 62(19)

shnuffy

7

2508

Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:04 pm

Simon Borys View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Handicap Parking ticket - Parking without transporting

bwalsh

2

1658

Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:10 am

daggx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Parking ticket on a Green P parking lot

CNBEY

7

646

Thu Feb 18, 2016 7:16 pm

CNBEY View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. - HTA O.Reg 611 and HTA 84

hydronaut

1

338

Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:54 am

screeech View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA S144(18) vs HTA S144(19) fatal error or not

momemon

2

1301

Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:41 pm

Decatur View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 144.18

thephoneguy

13

2125

Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:02 pm

lawmen View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 144 (14)

Questionz

13

1464

Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:15 am

Bookm View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 136(1)(b)

hershey

3

1147

Wed May 21, 2008 6:59 am

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 154 (1) a

Unluckygal

8

4838

Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:48 pm

Unluckygal View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. HTA 144(18)

tiredandjaded

10

4280

Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:06 am

FrankTheRabbit View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.