Hi all, Quick question for those on the site. I was driving a motor vehicle which began to have issues with its seat belt (it was faulty). The vehicle was not mine. I got pulled over and got a ticket for failure to wear a set belt. I'm looking to move forward on a due diligence defence, that there was nothing I could do. The mechanic who fixed the seatbelt may not be able to (or want to) show up in court to testify. Can I get him to simply swear an Affidavit and use that as evidence? Thanks
Hi all,
Quick question for those on the site. I was driving a motor vehicle which began to have issues with its seat belt (it was faulty). The vehicle was not mine.
I got pulled over and got a ticket for failure to wear a set belt. I'm looking to move forward on a due diligence defence, that there was nothing I could do.
The mechanic who fixed the seatbelt may not be able to (or want to) show up in court to testify. Can I get him to simply swear an Affidavit and use that as evidence?
The simple answer is No. If you really need the mechanic for your case, you can simply ask for a subpoena. The mechanic doesn't get to choose whether to attend or not. Only in very exceptional cases will affidavit evidence be permitted in lieu of viva voce evidence----accommodating the schedule of reluctant witnesses is not one of them! By the way, why is the mechanic needed anyway? After all, driving a vehicle with a known defect does not excuse your liability. If your plan is to introduce a mechanic's evidence that the belt was indeed defective, yet you continued to drive the vehicle, how does that help your due diligence defence? If anything, it might actually establish that you did have knowledge of the defect, had opportunity to take reasonable alternatives (i.e. get it fixed right away or simply not drive the car), and yet, intentionally drove the vehicle with such known defect. Bottom line: seriously think about your defence----moreso since the due diligence defence on seat belts is VERY limited.
The simple answer is No. If you really need the mechanic for your case, you can simply ask for a subpoena. The mechanic doesn't get to choose whether to attend or not. Only in very exceptional cases will affidavit evidence be permitted in lieu of viva voce evidence----accommodating the schedule of reluctant witnesses is not one of them!
By the way, why is the mechanic needed anyway? After all, driving a vehicle with a known defect does not excuse your liability. If your plan is to introduce a mechanic's evidence that the belt was indeed defective, yet you continued to drive the vehicle, how does that help your due diligence defence? If anything, it might actually establish that you did have knowledge of the defect, had opportunity to take reasonable alternatives (i.e. get it fixed right away or simply not drive the car), and yet, intentionally drove the vehicle with such known defect. Bottom line: seriously think about your defence----moreso since the due diligence defence on seat belts is VERY limited.
Thanks for the response. This was my first time driving this vehicle. I had no idea the status of the seatbelt. While driving, I noticed the belt didn't stay fastened. It'd keep opening and Id have to keep closing it. There was essentially nothing I can do, short of stopping the car and walking. If this was something known to me and I chose to drive the car anyway, I'd agree that it'd be a far shot... But this was my first time and I didn't know the status of the belt. What is the name of the statue that determines the rules and procedures of HTA cases (such as evidence). Is it the provincial offences act?
Thanks for the response.
This was my first time driving this vehicle. I had no idea the status of the seatbelt. While driving, I noticed the belt didn't stay fastened. It'd keep opening and Id have to keep closing it. There was essentially nothing I can do, short of stopping the car and walking. If this was something known to me and I chose to drive the car anyway, I'd agree that it'd be a far shot... But this was my first time and I didn't know the status of the belt.
What is the name of the statue that determines the rules and procedures of HTA cases (such as evidence). Is it the provincial offences act?
There rarely is any one-stop-shop legislation in common law based jurisdictions like Ontario. Rather, you have to refer to many sources of legislation, regulations and case law. You'll therefore need to at least be acquainted with the following (to name the most obvious ones): Highway Traffic Act HTA: Seat Belt Regulation Provincial Offences Act Courts of Justice Act CJA Reg: Rules of Ontario Court in Provincial Offences Proceedings Legislation Act and Evidence Act And for case law, you'll definitely need to be well-acquainted with the Court of Appeal decision in R.v.Wilson. The above information should prepared you well for your case. Merry Christmas!
There rarely is any one-stop-shop legislation in common law based jurisdictions like Ontario. Rather, you have to refer to many sources of legislation, regulations and case law. You'll therefore need to at least be acquainted with the following (to name the most obvious ones):
pulled over leaving a survey in guelph. After arguing with the officer for about 10 minutes, he mentioned something being wrong with my truck. Told me to put on my emergency brake, and i did. Told me to put it in gear, and i did, truck did not move. Told me to hit the gas, and i did and the truck…
Got two very heavy tickets -- for failing to stop for a school bus, and for using a handheld device. Was running late in a morning rush traffic in Toronto and apparently passed a school bus on the opposite side w/o noticing its signal. A few meters after that I stopped behind the other cars waiting…
I recently received a ticket for proceeding contrary to sign at an intersection. While there are other issues with the offence (sign is not visible until 10ft from intersection, officer wrote wrong license plate number on ticket) my biggest question is about the sign itself.
I posted here a *while* back when I first got my speeding ticket, and I've been fighting it forever. Anyway, long story short - I went and had an appeal and both the prosecutor and the Judge agree that I have valid grounds to appeal on, but what we're arguing is whether the correct remedy is a…
My wife had an auto accident back in May. It is gradually being dealt with by our insurance company ( by the broker actually). My question is about the legal power of the insurance code OAP1. Evidently this set of rules is the Ten Commandments for the insurance companies and the adjustors seem to…
What is the requirement for stopping when a school bus is traveling down the roadway, initiates the flashing red lights while still moving but has not yet stopped? If a motorist is traveling through an intersection (through the free-flow approach, minor-street stop controlled) and an oncoming…
In 2005, the government passed legislation that enabled the introduction of variable speed limits at some point in the future. It didn't take effect right away, so it sat waiting for "proclamation by the Lieutenant Governor." Just by chance... I was reading the HTA earlier while browsing this…
I was on my way to work on a divided four lane highway. I was in the right hand lane following the flow of traffic. There was a slower car ahead of me and I wanted to change lanes and maintain my speed. When I looked in my left side mirror, I notice a red car going pretty fast in the passing…
So i got charged with Hand Held Device, just want to ask everyone if i could use this as my defence
It was midnight, I was dropping my fiance to pick up something on north bound Yonge st (near church) with my emergency lights on, Officer came and asked me to move along so i went up a few streets and…