Here is what happened... My girlfriend which is a insured driver of my truck dropped me off at work yesterday and went to the mall which is a block away to go shopping. As she was leaving her parking spot to come back to me she clipped the car next to her turning to shortly. Panicing she drove off and came and got me crying that someone hit my truck unattended in the spot, she noticed it when she came out. Trying to go down all the proper avenue's I started a claim and went and got a police report stateing such. My girlfriend was visibly upset but thought nothing of it since it was my brand new truck and she thought I would be pissed. Later yesterday night it ate away at her too much and had to come clean. She called the police admitting to them what happened that she clipped a car in the parking lot. The cop investigateing the incident came and met her at my work filling out a new police report with the proper information and linking it to the original that I made. The question I have is the police officer ticketed her with "failure to report". She called the police admitting what she had done not even 4 hours later. So I was just curious what the good people on this forum think. Was she ticketed with the wrong offence or am should she just take the punishment?
Here is what happened...
My girlfriend which is a insured driver of my truck dropped me off at work yesterday and went to the mall which is a block away to go shopping. As she was leaving her parking spot to come back to me she clipped the car next to her turning to shortly. Panicing she drove off and came and got me crying that someone hit my truck unattended in the spot, she noticed it when she came out. Trying to go down all the proper avenue's I started a claim and went and got a police report stateing such. My girlfriend was visibly upset but thought nothing of it since it was my brand new truck and she thought I would be pissed. Later yesterday night it ate away at her too much and had to come clean. She called the police admitting to them what happened that she clipped a car in the parking lot. The cop investigateing the incident came and met her at my work filling out a new police report with the proper information and linking it to the original that I made. The question I have is the police officer ticketed her with "failure to report". She called the police admitting what she had done not even 4 hours later. So I was just curious what the good people on this forum think. Was she ticketed with the wrong offence or am should she just take the punishment?
Im actually somewhat surprised she wasnt charged criminally with public mischief, an arguably much more serious charge. While I do give her credit for eventually doing the right thing, I would have to say she did commit the offence of failing to report, because she didnt notify the police "forthwith" and allowed a false report to be made prior.
Im actually somewhat surprised she wasnt charged criminally with public mischief, an arguably much more serious charge. While I do give her credit for eventually doing the right thing, I would have to say she did commit the offence of failing to report, because she didnt notify the police "forthwith" and allowed a false report to be made prior.
I was told from an uneducated source that you are given 24 hours to file an accident claim. I'm just exhausting all my resource because I think the insurance is going to come down hard on both me and her since it seems they are somewhat impplieing that I was fully aware of the accident and was lieing to them.
I was told from an uneducated source that you are given 24 hours to file an accident claim. I'm just exhausting all my resource because I think the insurance is going to come down hard on both me and her since it seems they are somewhat impplieing that I was fully aware of the accident and was lieing to them.
No twenty four hour rule, the law simply says forthwith (basically as soon as practicable). In my opinion the false report clearly shows that she had the opportunity to notify the police earlier, but failed to do so (in that she provided false information). She likely will face serious insurance rate hikes upon conviction, so it may be worth consulting with a paralegal. They may see ways to fight the charge or possibly plead it down to something less serious. The fact that your girlfriend eventually came forward on her own could help for some leniency.
No twenty four hour rule, the law simply says forthwith (basically as soon as practicable). In my opinion the false report clearly shows that she had the opportunity to notify the police earlier, but failed to do so (in that she provided false information). She likely will face serious insurance rate hikes upon conviction, so it may be worth consulting with a paralegal. They may see ways to fight the charge or possibly plead it down to something less serious. The fact that your girlfriend eventually came forward on her own could help for some leniency.
That's what I'm hoping. I have left a message with "Ex-Copper" hopefully they can help. No charges were laid as far as purgery. But I don't know if the insurance can assume I was aware of the true events the whole time and raise my rates.
That's what I'm hoping. I have left a message with "Ex-Copper" hopefully they can help. No charges were laid as far as purgery. But I don't know if the insurance can assume I was aware of the true events the whole time and raise my rates.
Agree with Stanton. The way I see it, it looks like the officer was actually being lenient by charging her with "failure to report." It could've been worse. I suppose you could ask for a reduced fine in court, or possibly try to plea-bargain to a lesser charge. Technically, a report was made, but it was a false one. See what X-Copper says. As for insurance, the adjuster will likely be hard-core because of the circumstances, but you acted in good faith based upon the information you had at the time. It may be a bit of a struggle with them. Adjusters and insurance investigators who deal with auto claims have people lie to them non-stop, all day long, so the second there's any indication of impropriety, they tend to get aggressive. They really don't have any proof that you were lying to them. Once they get their hands on the police report, they should realize that you were just telling them what you had been told, and tried to correct it as soon as the truth was revealed. Your rates may be affected by the collision itself, but only because of that. There really isn't "insurance fraud" going on here, because you did not intentionally try to deceive them.
Agree with Stanton. The way I see it, it looks like the officer was actually being lenient by charging her with "failure to report." It could've been worse. I suppose you could ask for a reduced fine in court, or possibly try to plea-bargain to a lesser charge. Technically, a report was made, but it was a false one. See what X-Copper says.
As for insurance, the adjuster will likely be hard-core because of the circumstances, but you acted in good faith based upon the information you had at the time. It may be a bit of a struggle with them. Adjusters and insurance investigators who deal with auto claims have people lie to them non-stop, all day long, so the second there's any indication of impropriety, they tend to get aggressive. They really don't have any proof that you were lying to them. Once they get their hands on the police report, they should realize that you were just telling them what you had been told, and tried to correct it as soon as the truth was revealed. Your rates may be affected by the collision itself, but only because of that. There really isn't "insurance fraud" going on here, because you did not intentionally try to deceive them.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
That's the way I hope they see it. I honestly know my girlfriend is screwed, she may not be driving for awhile because of her record. There is just two things I don't want to happen. One I get blamed for lieing to my insurance company when I corrected the claim first thing the next morning not even 6 hours later. Secondly I'm not just going to lie down, I need to try and get a more lienient sentance for my girlfriend, I know she did something wrong and may diserve it but atleast she called and confessed on her own accord. The only thing I can see we have going for us is even on the original police report that was false the location and all details were still correct other then the act it self. So it wasn't like it was a full cover up. It wouldn't have been hard for them to track her down.
That's the way I hope they see it. I honestly know my girlfriend is screwed, she may not be driving for awhile because of her record. There is just two things I don't want to happen.
One I get blamed for lieing to my insurance company when I corrected the claim first thing the next morning not even 6 hours later.
Secondly I'm not just going to lie down, I need to try and get a more lienient sentance for my girlfriend, I know she did something wrong and may diserve it but atleast she called and confessed on her own accord.
The only thing I can see we have going for us is even on the original police report that was false the location and all details were still correct other then the act it self. So it wasn't like it was a full cover up. It wouldn't have been hard for them to track her down.
surely if the police "had" to track her down, she would be charged criminally for sure, that is what probably saved that charge, by coming forward
Cormacs wrote:
The only thing I can see we have going for us is even on the original police report that was false the location and all details were still correct other then the act it self. So it wasn't like it was a full cover up. It wouldn't have been hard for them to track her down.
surely if the police "had" to track her down, she would be charged criminally for sure, that is what probably saved that charge, by coming forward
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…