Hi, I'm new to this forum and looking for some advice. I'm a newish driver and got my first traffic ticket for failing to obey the signs (H.T.A. 182 (2)). I recognize that I am at fault for not paying close attention, but I very rarely drive in the area. (Still that's not an excuse, I'm aware of that) The bottom line though is that I really don't want to get those demerit points on my record. The police officer gave me some advice about taking the ticket to court, but now I don't remember if he said that I should plead guilty or not guilty. Any advice would be great. Thanks
Hi,
I'm new to this forum and looking for some advice.
I'm a newish driver and got my first traffic ticket for failing to obey the signs (H.T.A. 182 (2)).
I recognize that I am at fault for not paying close attention, but I very rarely drive in the area. (Still that's not an excuse, I'm aware of that) The bottom line though is that I really don't want to get those demerit points on my record.
The police officer gave me some advice about taking the ticket to court, but now I don't remember if he said that I should plead guilty or not guilty.
You have to tell us what you did. We can raed minds but only on zuoondays
Shiruvia wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to this forum and looking for some advice.
I'm a newish driver and got my first traffic ticket for failing to obey the signs (H.T.A. 182 (2)).
I recognize that I am at fault for not paying close attention, but I very rarely drive in the area. (Still that's not an excuse, I'm aware of that) The bottom line though is that I really don't want to get those demerit points on my record.
The police officer gave me some advice about taking the ticket to court, but now I don't remember if he said that I should plead guilty or not guilty.
Any advice would be great.
Thanks
You have to tell us what you did.
We can raed minds but only on zuoondays
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
So the story goes like this... I was going down southbound on Kennedy past Ellesmere. I wanted to stay on the right hand side of the road, because the store that I was looking for is located on the right side. However, I wasn't too sure about the location of the shop and it was the first time that I had driven down that street. I kept going straight down Kennedy until the shop came into view. The police followed me until I parked and explained what I had done wrong. I guess they're targeting the area due to the high accident rates. I did think it was odd that the street went down to a two-lane after Ellesmere, I should have realized that it was because of the mandatory right turn lane. Like I said above, I should have been more aware of the road not the area. Oh well, it could have been worse now that I have thought about it more. I'll be going to the courts on Wednesday to see if I can either ask for a trail or not. That's why I wondering which plea I should give. Thanks again.
So the story goes like this...
I was going down southbound on Kennedy past Ellesmere. I wanted to stay on the right hand side of the road, because the store that I was looking for is located on the right side. However, I wasn't too sure about the location of the shop and it was the first time that I had driven down that street. I kept going straight down Kennedy until the shop came into view. The police followed me until I parked and explained what I had done wrong. I guess they're targeting the area due to the high accident rates.
I did think it was odd that the street went down to a two-lane after Ellesmere, I should have realized that it was because of the mandatory right turn lane. Like I said above, I should have been more aware of the road not the area. Oh well, it could have been worse now that I have thought about it more.
I'll be going to the courts on Wednesday to see if I can either ask for a trail or not.
They're targeting the area because that particular intersection has a lot of people blowing by vehicles in the turning lane and then attempting to ram their way back in at the intersection... or proceeding across the intersection and cutting drivers off... causes more traffic congestion. Most of the crashes there are due to people running red lights. Anyway, that's an aside... Option 1 is pleading guilty and paying the fine. You get the conviction on your record, the fine, demerit points and possible insurance increase. Option 2 is pleading guilty with an explanation. You still get the demerit points, the conviction and a possible insurance increase. The JP may lower the fine, but that's it. You will be scheduled to appear in court for this. Option 3 is pleading not guilty. This gives you a chance to plea-bargain to a lesser offence (such aa municipal by-law infraction) or have a trial. With any ticket, you can choose this. Let us know what you decide to do. I think that these "disappearing" right lanes (ones that exit, etc) are stupid, in that they tend to convince drivers not to remain in the right (aka "driving") lane, but, it is what it is. There are two signs on Kennedy southbound approaching Ellesmere indicating that you must turn right frm that lane.
Shiruvia wrote:
I guess they're targeting the area due to the high accident rates.
They're targeting the area because that particular intersection has a lot of people blowing by vehicles in the turning lane and then attempting to ram their way back in at the intersection... or proceeding across the intersection and cutting drivers off... causes more traffic congestion. Most of the crashes there are due to people running red lights. Anyway, that's an aside...
Shiruvia wrote:
That's why I wondering which plea I should give.
Option 1 is pleading guilty and paying the fine. You get the conviction on your record, the fine, demerit points and possible insurance increase.
Option 2 is pleading guilty with an explanation. You still get the demerit points, the conviction and a possible insurance increase. The JP may lower the fine, but that's it. You will be scheduled to appear in court for this.
Option 3 is pleading not guilty. This gives you a chance to plea-bargain to a lesser offence (such aa municipal by-law infraction) or have a trial. With any ticket, you can choose this.
Let us know what you decide to do.
I think that these "disappearing" right lanes (ones that exit, etc) are stupid, in that they tend to convince drivers not to remain in the right (aka "driving") lane, but, it is what it is. There are two signs on Kennedy southbound approaching Ellesmere indicating that you must turn right frm that lane.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…