Hello, what determines between HTA and Municipal bylaw? There are some disobey sign $110 (eg. making a right turn between 4-6pm) and a bylaw improper turn (3-6pm) for 18.75. They both seem to be very similar.. My dad got a bylaw ticket for 18.75 for making a left turn into a small street on the invalid hours indicated. My brother got a disobey sign for making a similar turn on a different street at a different time frame. The only difference is that the disobey sign has a stop sign prior to turning. And the bylaw is a straight left turn without stops. can someone let me know what classifies as a bylaw and what doesn't?
Hello,
what determines between HTA and Municipal bylaw? There are some disobey sign $110 (eg. making a right turn between 4-6pm) and a bylaw improper turn (3-6pm) for 18.75. They both seem to be very similar..
My dad got a bylaw ticket for 18.75 for making a left turn into a small street on the invalid hours indicated. My brother got a disobey sign for making a similar turn on a different street at a different time frame.
The only difference is that the disobey sign has a stop sign prior to turning. And the bylaw is a straight left turn without stops.
can someone let me know what classifies as a bylaw and what doesn't?
The sign was placed there by the Municipality via a "bylaw" (law made by the city). Highway Traffic Act, Regulation 615 lists all signs (dimensions, location etc..). Offences: 1) receive an offence for disobeying a sign as put in to law by a "bylaw" OR 2) if the sign meets the requirements of HTA REG 615, a charge can be laid using the HTA So the in end a driver could be charged with either offence for the same sign.
The sign was placed there by the Municipality via a "bylaw" (law made by the city).
OK, so its all up to the discretion of the officer?? Can I argue that this is not a disobey sign charge?? instead it should be a bylaw improper turn charge? Since all sings in-essence are placed by the city and are municipal bylaws. so there is no clear definition to determine the two?
OK, so its all up to the discretion of the officer??
Can I argue that this is not a disobey sign charge?? instead it should be a bylaw improper turn charge?
Since all sings in-essence are placed by the city and are municipal bylaws.
so there is no clear definition to determine the two?
Right turn Only Lane, but went straight.. is 182(2) correct? Here is another disobey question. I was on heading southbound on Kennedy towards Ellesmere and there are 3 lanes. Left turn, centre, and right turn lane. There was a sign posted with a right turn arrow, but that was posted almost 50 yards before the turn.. There is no visible sign where the turn is. I went straight on that right turn lane and I merged onto the centre lane about 80 yards after I crossed the intersection. The reason I didnt noticed that it was a right turn lane only cause beyond the intersection there was a lane for me to go straight. It wasn't like the lane cuts off and I had to merge onto centre lane in the middle of the intersection. My questions is. Did the officer charge me correctly with disobey sign? or can I argue that it should be Proceed contray to sign directed? or some other charge Can I also argue that the sign was placed to far back for me to see it. They should have posted it at the intersection?? Should I even bother with that remark? it may seem like i don't pay attention while driving or something.
Right turn Only Lane, but went straight.. is 182(2) correct?
Here is another disobey question.
I was on heading southbound on Kennedy towards Ellesmere and there are 3 lanes. Left turn, centre, and right turn lane. There was a sign posted with a right turn arrow, but that was posted almost 50 yards before the turn.. There is no visible sign where the turn is.
I went straight on that right turn lane and I merged onto the centre lane about 80 yards after I crossed the intersection.
The reason I didnt noticed that it was a right turn lane only cause beyond the intersection there was a lane for me to go straight. It wasn't like the lane cuts off and I had to merge onto centre lane in the middle of the intersection.
My questions is. Did the officer charge me correctly with disobey sign?
or can I argue that it should be Proceed contray to sign directed? or some other charge
Can I also argue that the sign was placed to far back for me to see it. They should have posted it at the intersection?? Should I even bother with that remark? it may seem like i don't pay attention while driving or something.
Disobey sign is correct. The sign said right turn only in that lane and you did otherwise. You could argue the sign was too far back, but I don' think 50 meters is unreasonable.
Disobey sign is correct. The sign said right turn only in that lane and you did otherwise. You could argue the sign was too far back, but I don' think 50 meters is unreasonable.
There are 4 lanes SB on Kennedy at this location - designated left turn lane - 2 lanes straight thru - designated right turn lane which has: 2 "no right hand turn signs" - 1 pole south of DQ, the other about 16 sidewalk sections (16m) from the intersection PLUS 4 right turn arrows painted on the surface of the right turn lane, that starts 4 Hydro poles back of the intersection in front of DQ
Trigga wrote:
I was on heading southbound on Kennedy towards Ellesmere and there are 3 lanes. Left turn, centre, and right turn lane. There was a sign posted with a right turn arrow, but that was posted almost 50 yards before the turn.. There is no visible sign where the turn is.
There are 4 lanes SB on Kennedy at this location
- designated left turn lane
- 2 lanes straight thru
- designated right turn lane which has:
2 "no right hand turn signs" - 1 pole south of DQ, the other about 16 sidewalk sections (16m) from the intersection
PLUS
4 right turn arrows painted on the surface of the right turn lane, that starts 4 Hydro poles back of the intersection in front of DQ
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
In instances like this, both 182 (2) Disobey Sign and 144 (9) Proceed Contrary to Sign at Intersection apply. If the officer wanted to cut you a break (which is what happened to your father), they'll issue the by-law ticket. Normally, the sign must be visible for at least 60 metres. Your trial would probably be held at 1530 Markham Road. Most of the Prosecutors there try to get things done quickly, so if the officer doesn't show up, they'll just drop the charge. If not, they'll usually offer a plea-bargain of sorts (like the $18.75 by-law infraction). The main charges they really hammer people on are those caught driving suspended, driving without a licence, and driving without insurance (which happens quite a bit in Scarborough).
Trigga wrote:
My questions is. Did the officer charge me correctly with disobey sign?
or can I argue that it should be Proceed contray to sign directed? or some other charge
In instances like this, both 182 (2) Disobey Sign and 144 (9) Proceed Contrary to Sign at Intersection apply. If the officer wanted to cut you a break (which is what happened to your father), they'll issue the by-law ticket.
Normally, the sign must be visible for at least 60 metres.
Your trial would probably be held at 1530 Markham Road. Most of the Prosecutors there try to get things done quickly, so if the officer doesn't show up, they'll just drop the charge. If not, they'll usually offer a plea-bargain of sorts (like the $18.75 by-law infraction). The main charges they really hammer people on are those caught driving suspended, driving without a licence, and driving without insurance (which happens quite a bit in Scarborough).
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
