Fail to stop at stop sign-officers note

Richmondhiller
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined:

Fail to stop at stop sign-officers note

Unread post by Richmondhiller on

A friend received a summons for Disobey stop sign -fail to stop-136-1-a. He went through a stop sign in a rural area that he had never driven before and stuck another vehicle. The disclosure states 'there were trees along shoulder of road-possibly due to no lighting /trees stop sign could not have been seen. The officer is agreeing with my friend as to the reason of disobeying the stop sign.
Question-does this raise enough doubt to beat the charge. He does drive for a living and the ticket may effect that. Thanks


jsherk
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1722
Joined:

Unread post by jsherk on

IMPORTANT: At no time should your friend ever admit to disobeying the stop sign, to either the prosecutor or the officer. If they ask your friend this question, your friend should answer "I have no comment about that at this time." The only exception is if your friend takes the witness stand under oath (in this case they WOULD have to answer all questions honestly). However your friend has the right not to testify against themselves and does not have to take the witness stand, and if not on the witness stand under oath, they do not have to answer any questions about this.

I would say yes, this portion of the officers notes should probably raise enough doubt to get the charge dropped.

So during trial, the officer will testify and prosecutor will ask them questions to clarify.

Your friend will then get to cross-examine the officer. This is NOT the time for your friend to give their version of events, but this is the time to question the officer on their testimony and their notes. So your friend would ask lots of questions concerning this particular notation in the notebook.
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


User avatar
bobajob
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 507
Joined:

Unread post by bobajob on

Hey there,
question: if an LEO, stopped a guy for same, and asked the same question; can you refuse to answer or as you have advised, or similar.
Could you not get done for obstruction?
jsherk wrote:IMPORTANT: At no time should your friend ever admit to disobeying the stop sign, to either the prosecutor or the officer. If they ask your friend this question, your friend should answer "I have no comment about that at this time." The only exception is if your friend takes the witness stand under oath (in this case they WOULD have to answer all questions honestly). However your friend has the right not to testify against themselves and does not have to take the witness stand, and if not on the witness stand under oath, they do not have to answer any questions about this.

I would say yes, this portion of the officers notes should probably raise enough doubt to get the charge dropped.

So during trial, the officer will testify and prosecutor will ask them questions to clarify.

Your friend will then get to cross-examine the officer. This is NOT the time for your friend to give their version of events, but this is the time to question the officer on their testimony and their notes. So your friend would ask lots of questions concerning this particular notation in the notebook.
--------------------------------------------------------------
* NO you cant touch your phone
* Speeding is speeding
* Challenge every ticket
* Impaired driving, you should be locked up UNDER the jail


argyll
VIP
VIP
Posts: 888
Joined:

Posting Awards

Unread post by argyll on

No, obstruction is criminal and different. You do not have to self-incriminate yourself. The debate is always that by refusing to answer anything other than to identify yourself and provide any required details you will almost certainly be issued a ticket where one exists whereas being contrite can get you away with a warning.

Two strategies, both of which can work in different circumstances. In poker parlance, the admit it and hope for a warning is a bit like going all in because if you do get a ticket you're stuffed !
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !


User avatar
bobajob
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 507
Joined:

Unread post by bobajob on

ahh, gotcha

so a reply, like "I'm not sure I did Officer, but if I did I do apologize"
as opposed to, "sorry I reserve the right not to incriminate myself and hereby only giving you my name and address"
--------------------------------------------------------------
* NO you cant touch your phone
* Speeding is speeding
* Challenge every ticket
* Impaired driving, you should be locked up UNDER the jail


argyll
VIP
VIP
Posts: 888
Joined:

Posting Awards

Unread post by argyll on

You're on the right track but your first one has taken away your ability at trial to say that you did stop (if you did because you don't want to perjury yourself)

Your second one will get you a ticket EVERY time......and possibly any others that might normally have been overlooked.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !


User avatar
bobajob
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 507
Joined:

Unread post by bobajob on

so a polite "I'm sorry officer, I don't believe I did...." (pregnant pause) > ?
argyll wrote:You're on the right track but your first one has taken away your ability at trial to say that you did stop (if you did because you don't want to perjury yourself)

Your second one will get you a ticket EVERY time......and possibly any others that might normally have been overlooked.




--------------------------------------------------------------
* NO you cant touch your phone
* Speeding is speeding
* Challenge every ticket
* Impaired driving, you should be locked up UNDER the jail


Post Reply

Return to “Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal”