Three days ago I was pulled over on hwy7 in perth south region. The officer said he clocked me at 134 and threatened me with the consequences of going 50 and over. He then said he will roll it down to 49 over so i can be charged with speeding instead. I didn't realize i was going so much over, since it was 3am and quite dark everywhere (there are no lights) also it is pretty much barren land with barley any trees, so it was hard to feel that I was going fast at all. This is my first ever ticket of any sorts what options do I have? is there any possibility I can reduce the amount of points? Since the officer rolled it back does that mean i'm not allowed to take this to court? Any advice would be appreciated
Three days ago I was pulled over on hwy7 in perth south region.
The officer said he clocked me at 134 and threatened me with the consequences of going 50 and over.
He then said he will roll it down to 49 over so i can be charged with speeding instead.
I didn't realize i was going so much over, since it was 3am and quite dark everywhere (there are no lights)
also it is pretty much barren land with barley any trees, so it was hard to feel that I was going fast at all.
This is my first ever ticket of any sorts
what options do I have?
is there any possibility I can reduce the amount of points?
Since the officer rolled it back does that mean i'm not allowed to take this to court?
That was a HUGE break saving: 7 day impoundment fees, tow fees, 7 day suspended licence, 6 demerit points, fine starting at $2000 Instead lowered to 49 over: $359.00 and 4 points Might want to read this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1393.html Just b/c there is a lack of trees does not make it safe even in daylight. What this usually means is farmland and collisions INCREASE every OCT-DEC. This is due to crops being removed (mainly corn) and deer living and feeding in those crops are pushed/spooked out. Hence collisions with deer are increased.
That was a HUGE break saving: 7 day impoundment fees, tow fees, 7 day suspended licence, 6 demerit points, fine starting at $2000
Just b/c there is a lack of trees does not make it safe even in daylight. What this usually means is farmland and collisions INCREASE every OCT-DEC. This is due to crops being removed (mainly corn) and deer living and feeding in those crops are pushed/spooked out. Hence collisions with deer are increased.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Option 1 is pay it and that's it. You will probably get an insurance increase, and you will get 4 demerit points on your driving record. Option 2 is to plead guilty with an explanation. You would then go to court and explain why you were speeding, and then the Justice of the Peace might (but doesn't have to) lower the fine. You would still get 4 demerit points and the insurance increase regardless. Option 3 is pleading not guilty and requesting a trial. This could go either way. There is a possibility that the officer may not show for trial, or you could win on a technicality. (Speeding cases are won on technicalities.) Or, you could plea-bargain to a lesser speed. Given that the offence occurred in Perth County, the officer will likely be there. Technicalities could happen, but I wouldn't count on them. A more likely scenario is that the Prosecutor will amend the charge to Stunt Driving - 54 km/h Over the Limit. If convicted, the minimum fine would then go to $2000, possible lengthy licence suspension, 6 demerit points, and your insurance company would likely jack your premiums WAY up (could be double or more), etc. In that case, you would be wise to seek legal representation. In this particular instance, where the officer lowered the speed to 49 over, going for a trial is fraught with peril unless you are either very familiar with the court system, or you have a paralegal/lawyer representing you. But that's just my opinion, FWIW.
Option 1 is pay it and that's it. You will probably get an insurance increase, and you will get 4 demerit points on your driving record.
Option 2 is to plead guilty with an explanation. You would then go to court and explain why you were speeding, and then the Justice of the Peace might (but doesn't have to) lower the fine. You would still get 4 demerit points and the insurance increase regardless.
Option 3 is pleading not guilty and requesting a trial. This could go either way. There is a possibility that the officer may not show for trial, or you could win on a technicality. (Speeding cases are won on technicalities.) Or, you could plea-bargain to a lesser speed. Given that the offence occurred in Perth County, the officer will likely be there. Technicalities could happen, but I wouldn't count on them. A more likely scenario is that the Prosecutor will amend the charge to Stunt Driving - 54 km/h Over the Limit. If convicted, the minimum fine would then go to $2000, possible lengthy licence suspension, 6 demerit points, and your insurance company would likely jack your premiums WAY up (could be double or more), etc. In that case, you would be wise to seek legal representation. In this particular instance, where the officer lowered the speed to 49 over, going for a trial is fraught with peril unless you are either very familiar with the court system, or you have a paralegal/lawyer representing you.
But that's just my opinion, FWIW.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Do insurance companies judge based on how many points you get off? or by how much you speed? considering its my first ever offence, would they ignore something like this even if it costs me 4 points? and also as for paralegals... I go to school in waterloo right now are there any suggestions for good paralegals? and how much would one cost?
Do insurance companies judge based on how many points you get off?
or by how much you speed?
considering its my first ever offence, would they ignore something like this even if it costs me 4 points?
This is a common misconception. Insurance companies do not keep track of demerit points. They only care about convictions, collisions, and suspensions. For a very small infraction, like 15-over, they might not raise your rates, but 49-over will definitely result in an increase. It might just be a surcharge, but if you get nailed with Stunt Driving or speeding more than 50 over, your rates will go through the roof. For paralegals, there are a number in the Ottawa area who could represent you. I am not familiar with their rates. But you can make some phone calls and see what is available.
kejiang wrote:
Do insurance companies judge based on how many points you get off?
or by how much you speed?
considering its my first ever offence, would they ignore something like this even if it costs me 4 points?
This is a common misconception. Insurance companies do not keep track of demerit points. They only care about convictions, collisions, and suspensions. For a very small infraction, like 15-over, they might not raise your rates, but 49-over will definitely result in an increase. It might just be a surcharge, but if you get nailed with Stunt Driving or speeding more than 50 over, your rates will go through the roof.
For paralegals, there are a number in the Ottawa area who could represent you. I am not familiar with their rates. But you can make some phone calls and see what is available.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Oh thanks and sorry can you clarify the term "surcharge"? since I'm not the one paying for my insurance does that mean the monthly payment is increased? or just a one time fee? also, If it were possible to get a reduction, to lets say 29 km/h over, would the amount of insurance increase be less? and thank you for the paralegal suggestions but I currently reside in waterloo, and the courthouse (if i choose to go to court) is in Stratford. That's quite far from here. Would they send someone all the way here to represent me?
Oh thanks
and sorry can you clarify the term "surcharge"?
since I'm not the one paying for my insurance
does that mean the monthly payment is increased? or just a one time fee?
also, If it were possible to get a reduction, to lets say 29 km/h over, would the amount of insurance increase be less?
and thank you for the paralegal suggestions but I currently reside in waterloo, and the courthouse (if i choose to go to court) is in Stratford.
That's quite far from here. Would they send someone all the way here to represent me?
Surcharge would mean your insurance is increased for the next 3 years by charging you an additional fee for the speeding ticket. 29 over would, in all likelihood, result in a lower increase. For the paralegals - I read "Perth" and I thought Perth, Ontario - which is near Ottawa, but you'd wrote "Perth south region." That's my mistake. There are lots of paralegals in the GTA who could make the trip out to Stratford to help out.
Surcharge would mean your insurance is increased for the next 3 years by charging you an additional fee for the speeding ticket. 29 over would, in all likelihood, result in a lower increase.
For the paralegals - I read "Perth" and I thought Perth, Ontario - which is near Ottawa, but you'd wrote "Perth south region." That's my mistake. There are lots of paralegals in the GTA who could make the trip out to Stratford to help out.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
ohh thank you hmm do you know how likely is it for cops in the perth south region and stratford area to turn up for at court? and also according to the new law, since I have a G2, getting charged with 30 - 49 over means 4 points and that means suspension for 30 days right? would my insurance be even further affected by a suspension resulting from this ticket?
ohh thank you
hmm do you know how likely is it for cops in the perth south region and stratford area to turn up for at court?
and also according to the new law, since I have a G2, getting charged with 30 - 49 over means 4 points and that means suspension for 30 days right?
would my insurance be even further affected by a suspension resulting from this ticket?
Okay updates: I sent my ticket in with option 3, and 3 weeks or so later I received my trial date by mail (fast?) The date is set to be February 1, 2011 at 10:00 am, which is quite soon... I don't think I have a first attendance meeting either... So anyways, I also have a sheet that says (summarized): 1. You may discuss a possible resolution of this charge with the municipal prosecutor (call in or visit during office hours). 2. you may receive a copy of the evidence on this matter by completing the form at the bottom. 3. you are also advised that it is less likely that the charges will be reduced on the day of the trial. What would be the best course of action here then? Is there any point in contacting the prosecutor? Should I file for a disclosure? and if i do, do i have to drop it off at the office or mail it in? I have called Xcoppers a few weeks ago and they turned me away. The lady said i can try asking them for help, but it'll cost like $500 and they'll probably end up pleading me guilty to the original charge. Should i try other paralegal places?
Okay updates:
I sent my ticket in with option 3, and 3 weeks or so later I received my trial date by mail (fast?)
The date is set to be February 1, 2011 at 10:00 am, which is quite soon...
I don't think I have a first attendance meeting either...
So anyways, I also have a sheet that says (summarized):
1. You may discuss a possible resolution of this charge with the municipal prosecutor (call in or visit during office hours).
2. you may receive a copy of the evidence on this matter by completing the form at the bottom.
3. you are also advised that it is less likely that the charges will be reduced on the day of the trial.
What would be the best course of action here then?
Is there any point in contacting the prosecutor?
Should I file for a disclosure? and if i do, do i have to drop it off at the office or mail it in?
I have called Xcoppers a few weeks ago and they turned me away. The lady said i can try asking them for help, but it'll cost like $500 and they'll probably end up pleading me guilty to the original charge.
Well depends on what you want to do... you might be able to drop in to the Prosecutor's office to get a further reduction in the speeding charge. I'd do that ASAP and see what they offer. If you get nothing other than "49 over, take it or leave it," I would suggest you just keep it "as is," and move on. Others may disagree with me, but if you can't get a reduction through First Attendance (the first option they suggested), then just pay it. Be forewarned, courts in rural Ontario have much more time to handle cases than they do in, say, Toronto. If you file for disclosure, the Prosecutor will almost certainly become aware that you were driving more than 50 km/h over the limit, and may immediately seek to amend the charge to Stunt Driving. Then you are in trouble. Approach this with a considerable amount of caution. You could try another paralegal agency, but I would think that they'd also turn you away. I think that the response you got from Xcopper was appropriate given the circumstances. Your best bet seems to be trying to negotiate a plea deal prior to the day of trial.
Well depends on what you want to do... you might be able to drop in to the Prosecutor's office to get a further reduction in the speeding charge. I'd do that ASAP and see what they offer. If you get nothing other than "49 over, take it or leave it," I would suggest you just keep it "as is," and move on. Others may disagree with me, but if you can't get a reduction through First Attendance (the first option they suggested), then just pay it. Be forewarned, courts in rural Ontario have much more time to handle cases than they do in, say, Toronto. If you file for disclosure, the Prosecutor will almost certainly become aware that you were driving more than 50 km/h over the limit, and may immediately seek to amend the charge to Stunt Driving. Then you are in trouble. Approach this with a considerable amount of caution. You could try another paralegal agency, but I would think that they'd also turn you away. I think that the response you got from Xcopper was appropriate given the circumstances. Your best bet seems to be trying to negotiate a plea deal prior to the day of trial.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Final update: Thanks for the help guys, I went to the prosecutor's office today. He was quite nice and changed the charge to a "disobey sign" considering it was my first ticket. But the fine remains the same (not that i mind too much), and i still have to show up in court. So yeah I think I got a lucky break for 2 points instead of 4. By the way, would a disobey sign offense affect my insurance? Also, how would the court procedures work for this? Would they just say what i'm now charged for and I have to plead guilty? Or will the old charge still be brought up?
Final update:
Thanks for the help guys, I went to the prosecutor's office today. He was quite nice and changed the charge to a "disobey sign" considering it was my first ticket. But the fine remains the same (not that i mind too much), and i still have to show up in court. So yeah I think I got a lucky break for 2 points instead of 4. By the way, would a disobey sign offense affect my insurance?
Also, how would the court procedures work for this? Would they just say what i'm now charged for and I have to plead guilty? Or will the old charge still be brought up?
Well looks like you played this one perfectly. Not only did you save demerit points, it also saved you a licence suspension. 4 demerit points, as you know, would've netted you a licence suspension as you are a G2 driver. In addition, I think you'll probably get an insurance increase. HOWEVER, don't be disappointed with that. You were looking at a double-whammy insurance hit for the "49 over" and the licence suspension. You still have to pay the same fine, but you saved HUGE $$$ on your insurance bill. What will happen is, on the day your trial was scheduled, you will go in and check in with the Prosecutor. They will say "kejiang, you are charged on or about the (whatever day it happened) in the County of Perth South, did commit the offence of disobey sign, contrary to Highway Traffic Act, section 182 (2), how do you plead?" You will then reply: "Guilty." They will say "plea of guilty, conviction is registered." Then there will be submissions as to penalty, at which point the Prosecutor will submit that, as part of the plea deal, you were agreeing to pay "x" amount of dollars. The Justice of the Peace will probably ask you if agree, you will say "I do, your Worship." And then they'll hand you a form with payment instructions. Done and done.
Well looks like you played this one perfectly. Not only did you save demerit points, it also saved you a licence suspension. 4 demerit points, as you know, would've netted you a licence suspension as you are a G2 driver. In addition, I think you'll probably get an insurance increase. HOWEVER, don't be disappointed with that. You were looking at a double-whammy insurance hit for the "49 over" and the licence suspension. You still have to pay the same fine, but you saved HUGE $$$ on your insurance bill.
What will happen is, on the day your trial was scheduled, you will go in and check in with the Prosecutor. They will say "kejiang, you are charged on or about the (whatever day it happened) in the County of Perth South, did commit the offence of disobey sign, contrary to Highway Traffic Act, section 182 (2), how do you plead?" You will then reply: "Guilty." They will say "plea of guilty, conviction is registered." Then there will be submissions as to penalty, at which point the Prosecutor will submit that, as part of the plea deal, you were agreeing to pay "x" amount of dollars. The Justice of the Peace will probably ask you if agree, you will say "I do, your Worship." And then they'll hand you a form with payment instructions.
Done and done.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
ok well here is my story .. I had an old megaphone from alarm system and decided since my horns on my car were rusted and were not making a loud enough sound.. i connected the alarm megaphone to the horn wires and it sounded very cool. depending on how log i hold my horn down for . due to the size of the power horn.. and mhy car being a Honda.. meaning no room under the hood i had installed it…
So I got this ticket because the lady behind me was WAY too close and I had to back up before getting hit by another car and dented her bumper.
Offense is stated as follows: Start from Stopped position - Not in Safety
Highway Traffic Act 142 (2)
First of all, I don't really know what that means and if it says that I was not in safety (which I wasn't) why am I getting a ticket? And why didn't the…
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly reached into my bag to grab a lip balm. I noticed I had brought the wrong one so I just kept it out and…
It happened last December. I was facing north in the middle of the intersection at Donmills and McNicoll waiting to make a left turn. There was a big white van on the other side of McNicoll facing south waiting to turn left too. When the light changed to amber, I checked and the road was clear, there was no upcoming vehicle. So slowly I made the left turn. Suddenly a small car dashed up from…
First off, the most similar case and HELPFUL thread has y far come from neo333: a great read and very similar and relevant to my case and of course ticketcombat.com
I'll cole's notes this so that it can be concise and can recap my experience with disclosure, notes and failed stay request and adjourned court date. Thank you for reading and leaving your opinion.
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
Got my first ticket last Thursday and I have a couple of questions. I was driving westbound on Moore St. (west of Bayview) and made a left onto a residential street at a 4-way stop sign. It was my first time driving through that area - was driving my girlfriend to a wisdom tooth surgery.
The police were set up to catch people, as that intersection had a no left turn sign from 7-9 am (buses…
I was in a light collision with a police vehicle last November and will be having a trial by the end of the month. What happened was I was pulled over. I stopped and kept my right signal on. The cop car then tried to pull behind me when he was on my left but 2 cars pulled behind me. The cop wasn't too smart and instead of waiting for the two cars to pull away, he drove forward and boxed all the…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a ticket in the mail. The ticket is under my name as the registered owner: charged with Fail to Stop for…
I have just got a ticket (Fail to yield on through highway) and by the way it's me first ticket and this is how I got it.
Me driving in a residential neighborhood maybe 10-15 km/h approaching a stop sign completely stopped at the stop sign started moving again turning right and out of nowhere I was hit by this van. he went directly to the driver's side fender,wheel, and bumper. Since it was my…
Hi I'm new to this forum but I hope I'm bringing you all good news.
I recently wrote a book short titled ABUSE OF POWER
This book is all about how the Ontario government broke the law to enact the new street racing legislation.
To start with the denial of the right to remain innocent until proven guilty was enacted without due process under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How it wasn't done…
So i lent my car to my gf the other day and she went to drop her friend at a Go station but when she was turning left into the parking lot at the Go station a bus hits her from behind while she was turning so now my rear fender is pushed in and more scrathes and my bumper is damaged...but the cop that showed up just kept telling my gf thats its her fault cause its private property...is that true…
Hi, thanks for reading. I've read a bunch of articles online and searched the forum to try and find my answers but I'm still unsure so I'm creating a new thread.
I was following a car that was going SUPER fast down the DVP but I got pulled over. I was speeding, too; however I don't want to use the "you got the wrong guy" defence because I'll probably lose.
I left my home at 4 am to pick up my daughter from downtown Toronto. When I passed the major intersection south of my house there were two police cars in the middle of the intersection and one officer waved me through the intersection.
When I returned with my daughter at 5:30 am the police cars were still in the intersection. I slowed down as I approached the intersection but the police were no…
I will be representing my wife at her speeding trial next week. Mostly everything is pretty much run of the mill but since she wasn't speeding we will be having her take the stand. Since this opens up the opportunity for the prosecutor to cross examine, I am just wondering if anyone here knows what kind of questions we should expect from the prosecutor in order to best prepare.
When the court sends out the notice of trial, do they use the address the officer wrote on the ticket, or the actual address in the MTO database? In the case of the former, what are the implications? The reason I ask is that my wife got a ticket last week and the officer wrote the wrong city on it.
This topic discusses the same thing but with CN police; is it any different for regular offences?
Driving onto ramp entering a major highway, posted limit is 100km/h, suggested ramp limit is 40km/h - I end up colliding with the concrete barrier on the passenger side of the vehicle.
Police arrive, suspect alcohol and breathalyze me with a result of 0.00 - I am asked for a statement and cautioned, however (stupidly) I proceed to provide the details anyways.
My friends and I were heading to Kelso Beach, I had signalled and i pulled off to the shoulder as my car seemed to be making noise, but after riding over the shoulder the noise stopped, i signalled back again and merged back into traffic after making sure it was safe, the officer which was ahead of me on the shoulder a few meters away pulled me over.…
I've decided to fight a traffic ticket for stop sign violation. The offense was 12 months ago, and I've got a court date for next Tuesday. I've requested disclosure and, although a bit last minute, received it two weeks before my court date.
Upon reviewing the case materials, there isn't much of a defense I can find -based on the cop having an obstructed view, or any mistakes in the…
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I'm a newbie, so be kind if I'm messing up. Question: is it illegal to signal oncoming traffic that they are approaching a speed trap by flashing one's lights?
I ask because I was stopped for doing that yesterday evening, but did not end up with a ticket. The officer spend 5-10 minutes n his car, then sent me on my way. I'm wondering if he changed his mind or found out it was legal.