Three days ago I was pulled over on hwy7 in perth south region. The officer said he clocked me at 134 and threatened me with the consequences of going 50 and over. He then said he will roll it down to 49 over so i can be charged with speeding instead. I didn't realize i was going so much over, since it was 3am and quite dark everywhere (there are no lights) also it is pretty much barren land with barley any trees, so it was hard to feel that I was going fast at all. This is my first ever ticket of any sorts what options do I have? is there any possibility I can reduce the amount of points? Since the officer rolled it back does that mean i'm not allowed to take this to court? Any advice would be appreciated
Three days ago I was pulled over on hwy7 in perth south region.
The officer said he clocked me at 134 and threatened me with the consequences of going 50 and over.
He then said he will roll it down to 49 over so i can be charged with speeding instead.
I didn't realize i was going so much over, since it was 3am and quite dark everywhere (there are no lights)
also it is pretty much barren land with barley any trees, so it was hard to feel that I was going fast at all.
This is my first ever ticket of any sorts
what options do I have?
is there any possibility I can reduce the amount of points?
Since the officer rolled it back does that mean i'm not allowed to take this to court?
That was a HUGE break saving: 7 day impoundment fees, tow fees, 7 day suspended licence, 6 demerit points, fine starting at $2000 Instead lowered to 49 over: $359.00 and 4 points Might want to read this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1393.html Just b/c there is a lack of trees does not make it safe even in daylight. What this usually means is farmland and collisions INCREASE every OCT-DEC. This is due to crops being removed (mainly corn) and deer living and feeding in those crops are pushed/spooked out. Hence collisions with deer are increased.
That was a HUGE break saving: 7 day impoundment fees, tow fees, 7 day suspended licence, 6 demerit points, fine starting at $2000
Just b/c there is a lack of trees does not make it safe even in daylight. What this usually means is farmland and collisions INCREASE every OCT-DEC. This is due to crops being removed (mainly corn) and deer living and feeding in those crops are pushed/spooked out. Hence collisions with deer are increased.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Option 1 is pay it and that's it. You will probably get an insurance increase, and you will get 4 demerit points on your driving record. Option 2 is to plead guilty with an explanation. You would then go to court and explain why you were speeding, and then the Justice of the Peace might (but doesn't have to) lower the fine. You would still get 4 demerit points and the insurance increase regardless. Option 3 is pleading not guilty and requesting a trial. This could go either way. There is a possibility that the officer may not show for trial, or you could win on a technicality. (Speeding cases are won on technicalities.) Or, you could plea-bargain to a lesser speed. Given that the offence occurred in Perth County, the officer will likely be there. Technicalities could happen, but I wouldn't count on them. A more likely scenario is that the Prosecutor will amend the charge to Stunt Driving - 54 km/h Over the Limit. If convicted, the minimum fine would then go to $2000, possible lengthy licence suspension, 6 demerit points, and your insurance company would likely jack your premiums WAY up (could be double or more), etc. In that case, you would be wise to seek legal representation. In this particular instance, where the officer lowered the speed to 49 over, going for a trial is fraught with peril unless you are either very familiar with the court system, or you have a paralegal/lawyer representing you. But that's just my opinion, FWIW.
Option 1 is pay it and that's it. You will probably get an insurance increase, and you will get 4 demerit points on your driving record.
Option 2 is to plead guilty with an explanation. You would then go to court and explain why you were speeding, and then the Justice of the Peace might (but doesn't have to) lower the fine. You would still get 4 demerit points and the insurance increase regardless.
Option 3 is pleading not guilty and requesting a trial. This could go either way. There is a possibility that the officer may not show for trial, or you could win on a technicality. (Speeding cases are won on technicalities.) Or, you could plea-bargain to a lesser speed. Given that the offence occurred in Perth County, the officer will likely be there. Technicalities could happen, but I wouldn't count on them. A more likely scenario is that the Prosecutor will amend the charge to Stunt Driving - 54 km/h Over the Limit. If convicted, the minimum fine would then go to $2000, possible lengthy licence suspension, 6 demerit points, and your insurance company would likely jack your premiums WAY up (could be double or more), etc. In that case, you would be wise to seek legal representation. In this particular instance, where the officer lowered the speed to 49 over, going for a trial is fraught with peril unless you are either very familiar with the court system, or you have a paralegal/lawyer representing you.
But that's just my opinion, FWIW.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Do insurance companies judge based on how many points you get off? or by how much you speed? considering its my first ever offence, would they ignore something like this even if it costs me 4 points? and also as for paralegals... I go to school in waterloo right now are there any suggestions for good paralegals? and how much would one cost?
Do insurance companies judge based on how many points you get off?
or by how much you speed?
considering its my first ever offence, would they ignore something like this even if it costs me 4 points?
This is a common misconception. Insurance companies do not keep track of demerit points. They only care about convictions, collisions, and suspensions. For a very small infraction, like 15-over, they might not raise your rates, but 49-over will definitely result in an increase. It might just be a surcharge, but if you get nailed with Stunt Driving or speeding more than 50 over, your rates will go through the roof. For paralegals, there are a number in the Ottawa area who could represent you. I am not familiar with their rates. But you can make some phone calls and see what is available.
kejiang wrote:
Do insurance companies judge based on how many points you get off?
or by how much you speed?
considering its my first ever offence, would they ignore something like this even if it costs me 4 points?
This is a common misconception. Insurance companies do not keep track of demerit points. They only care about convictions, collisions, and suspensions. For a very small infraction, like 15-over, they might not raise your rates, but 49-over will definitely result in an increase. It might just be a surcharge, but if you get nailed with Stunt Driving or speeding more than 50 over, your rates will go through the roof.
For paralegals, there are a number in the Ottawa area who could represent you. I am not familiar with their rates. But you can make some phone calls and see what is available.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Oh thanks and sorry can you clarify the term "surcharge"? since I'm not the one paying for my insurance does that mean the monthly payment is increased? or just a one time fee? also, If it were possible to get a reduction, to lets say 29 km/h over, would the amount of insurance increase be less? and thank you for the paralegal suggestions but I currently reside in waterloo, and the courthouse (if i choose to go to court) is in Stratford. That's quite far from here. Would they send someone all the way here to represent me?
Oh thanks
and sorry can you clarify the term "surcharge"?
since I'm not the one paying for my insurance
does that mean the monthly payment is increased? or just a one time fee?
also, If it were possible to get a reduction, to lets say 29 km/h over, would the amount of insurance increase be less?
and thank you for the paralegal suggestions but I currently reside in waterloo, and the courthouse (if i choose to go to court) is in Stratford.
That's quite far from here. Would they send someone all the way here to represent me?
Surcharge would mean your insurance is increased for the next 3 years by charging you an additional fee for the speeding ticket. 29 over would, in all likelihood, result in a lower increase. For the paralegals - I read "Perth" and I thought Perth, Ontario - which is near Ottawa, but you'd wrote "Perth south region." That's my mistake. There are lots of paralegals in the GTA who could make the trip out to Stratford to help out.
Surcharge would mean your insurance is increased for the next 3 years by charging you an additional fee for the speeding ticket. 29 over would, in all likelihood, result in a lower increase.
For the paralegals - I read "Perth" and I thought Perth, Ontario - which is near Ottawa, but you'd wrote "Perth south region." That's my mistake. There are lots of paralegals in the GTA who could make the trip out to Stratford to help out.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
ohh thank you hmm do you know how likely is it for cops in the perth south region and stratford area to turn up for at court? and also according to the new law, since I have a G2, getting charged with 30 - 49 over means 4 points and that means suspension for 30 days right? would my insurance be even further affected by a suspension resulting from this ticket?
ohh thank you
hmm do you know how likely is it for cops in the perth south region and stratford area to turn up for at court?
and also according to the new law, since I have a G2, getting charged with 30 - 49 over means 4 points and that means suspension for 30 days right?
would my insurance be even further affected by a suspension resulting from this ticket?
Okay updates: I sent my ticket in with option 3, and 3 weeks or so later I received my trial date by mail (fast?) The date is set to be February 1, 2011 at 10:00 am, which is quite soon... I don't think I have a first attendance meeting either... So anyways, I also have a sheet that says (summarized): 1. You may discuss a possible resolution of this charge with the municipal prosecutor (call in or visit during office hours). 2. you may receive a copy of the evidence on this matter by completing the form at the bottom. 3. you are also advised that it is less likely that the charges will be reduced on the day of the trial. What would be the best course of action here then? Is there any point in contacting the prosecutor? Should I file for a disclosure? and if i do, do i have to drop it off at the office or mail it in? I have called Xcoppers a few weeks ago and they turned me away. The lady said i can try asking them for help, but it'll cost like $500 and they'll probably end up pleading me guilty to the original charge. Should i try other paralegal places?
Okay updates:
I sent my ticket in with option 3, and 3 weeks or so later I received my trial date by mail (fast?)
The date is set to be February 1, 2011 at 10:00 am, which is quite soon...
I don't think I have a first attendance meeting either...
So anyways, I also have a sheet that says (summarized):
1. You may discuss a possible resolution of this charge with the municipal prosecutor (call in or visit during office hours).
2. you may receive a copy of the evidence on this matter by completing the form at the bottom.
3. you are also advised that it is less likely that the charges will be reduced on the day of the trial.
What would be the best course of action here then?
Is there any point in contacting the prosecutor?
Should I file for a disclosure? and if i do, do i have to drop it off at the office or mail it in?
I have called Xcoppers a few weeks ago and they turned me away. The lady said i can try asking them for help, but it'll cost like $500 and they'll probably end up pleading me guilty to the original charge.
Well depends on what you want to do... you might be able to drop in to the Prosecutor's office to get a further reduction in the speeding charge. I'd do that ASAP and see what they offer. If you get nothing other than "49 over, take it or leave it," I would suggest you just keep it "as is," and move on. Others may disagree with me, but if you can't get a reduction through First Attendance (the first option they suggested), then just pay it. Be forewarned, courts in rural Ontario have much more time to handle cases than they do in, say, Toronto. If you file for disclosure, the Prosecutor will almost certainly become aware that you were driving more than 50 km/h over the limit, and may immediately seek to amend the charge to Stunt Driving. Then you are in trouble. Approach this with a considerable amount of caution. You could try another paralegal agency, but I would think that they'd also turn you away. I think that the response you got from Xcopper was appropriate given the circumstances. Your best bet seems to be trying to negotiate a plea deal prior to the day of trial.
Well depends on what you want to do... you might be able to drop in to the Prosecutor's office to get a further reduction in the speeding charge. I'd do that ASAP and see what they offer. If you get nothing other than "49 over, take it or leave it," I would suggest you just keep it "as is," and move on. Others may disagree with me, but if you can't get a reduction through First Attendance (the first option they suggested), then just pay it. Be forewarned, courts in rural Ontario have much more time to handle cases than they do in, say, Toronto. If you file for disclosure, the Prosecutor will almost certainly become aware that you were driving more than 50 km/h over the limit, and may immediately seek to amend the charge to Stunt Driving. Then you are in trouble. Approach this with a considerable amount of caution. You could try another paralegal agency, but I would think that they'd also turn you away. I think that the response you got from Xcopper was appropriate given the circumstances. Your best bet seems to be trying to negotiate a plea deal prior to the day of trial.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Final update: Thanks for the help guys, I went to the prosecutor's office today. He was quite nice and changed the charge to a "disobey sign" considering it was my first ticket. But the fine remains the same (not that i mind too much), and i still have to show up in court. So yeah I think I got a lucky break for 2 points instead of 4. By the way, would a disobey sign offense affect my insurance? Also, how would the court procedures work for this? Would they just say what i'm now charged for and I have to plead guilty? Or will the old charge still be brought up?
Final update:
Thanks for the help guys, I went to the prosecutor's office today. He was quite nice and changed the charge to a "disobey sign" considering it was my first ticket. But the fine remains the same (not that i mind too much), and i still have to show up in court. So yeah I think I got a lucky break for 2 points instead of 4. By the way, would a disobey sign offense affect my insurance?
Also, how would the court procedures work for this? Would they just say what i'm now charged for and I have to plead guilty? Or will the old charge still be brought up?
Well looks like you played this one perfectly. Not only did you save demerit points, it also saved you a licence suspension. 4 demerit points, as you know, would've netted you a licence suspension as you are a G2 driver. In addition, I think you'll probably get an insurance increase. HOWEVER, don't be disappointed with that. You were looking at a double-whammy insurance hit for the "49 over" and the licence suspension. You still have to pay the same fine, but you saved HUGE $$$ on your insurance bill. What will happen is, on the day your trial was scheduled, you will go in and check in with the Prosecutor. They will say "kejiang, you are charged on or about the (whatever day it happened) in the County of Perth South, did commit the offence of disobey sign, contrary to Highway Traffic Act, section 182 (2), how do you plead?" You will then reply: "Guilty." They will say "plea of guilty, conviction is registered." Then there will be submissions as to penalty, at which point the Prosecutor will submit that, as part of the plea deal, you were agreeing to pay "x" amount of dollars. The Justice of the Peace will probably ask you if agree, you will say "I do, your Worship." And then they'll hand you a form with payment instructions. Done and done.
Well looks like you played this one perfectly. Not only did you save demerit points, it also saved you a licence suspension. 4 demerit points, as you know, would've netted you a licence suspension as you are a G2 driver. In addition, I think you'll probably get an insurance increase. HOWEVER, don't be disappointed with that. You were looking at a double-whammy insurance hit for the "49 over" and the licence suspension. You still have to pay the same fine, but you saved HUGE $$$ on your insurance bill.
What will happen is, on the day your trial was scheduled, you will go in and check in with the Prosecutor. They will say "kejiang, you are charged on or about the (whatever day it happened) in the County of Perth South, did commit the offence of disobey sign, contrary to Highway Traffic Act, section 182 (2), how do you plead?" You will then reply: "Guilty." They will say "plea of guilty, conviction is registered." Then there will be submissions as to penalty, at which point the Prosecutor will submit that, as part of the plea deal, you were agreeing to pay "x" amount of dollars. The Justice of the Peace will probably ask you if agree, you will say "I do, your Worship." And then they'll hand you a form with payment instructions.
Done and done.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…