Hello, I recieved a 149 km/h on the 401. Not going to make excuses, I regret it and wasn't a normal thing I normally do. The officer said I was going faster and reduced it but gave me a second ticket as well for not stopping before turning right at the red light... Up till now I've had a clean record, 26 years old, full G driving for a long time, my insurance is with Allstate and I have 1st time minor conviction waiver. Can anyone advise on my situation, I'm not really looking to fight it as this was already reduced from an over 50km/h and most places I've read have said anything between 1-49km/h holds the same value in the eyes of insurance. Can someone please confirm that and any idea what my premiums would increase by next year? are we looking at double increase? (2 minor convictions)? or is this a 1 major and 1 minor.
Hello, I recieved a 149 km/h on the 401. Not going to make excuses, I regret it and wasn't a normal thing I normally do.
The officer said I was going faster and reduced it but gave me a second ticket as well for not stopping before turning right at the red light...
Up till now I've had a clean record, 26 years old, full G driving for a long time, my insurance is with Allstate and I have 1st time minor conviction waiver.
Can anyone advise on my situation, I'm not really looking to fight it as this was already reduced from an over 50km/h and most places I've read have said anything between 1-49km/h holds the same value in the eyes of insurance. Can someone please confirm that and any idea what my premiums would increase by next year? are we looking at double increase? (2 minor convictions)? or is this a 1 major and 1 minor.
Insurance will split all convictions into three categories. Those are minor, major, serious. Typically, these are how speeding convictions are split. Minor - Speeding - any type, except when listed as major or serious. Major - Improper passing/speeding in a school or playground zone. Serious - Speeding 50 kph or more over the speed limit. The exemption would be speeding when it's considered stunting. Since the new rules recently went in, speeding 40+ in an 80 or less zone could now be considered stunting. That would fall into the serious category regardless if it was 40-49. Lots of people ask what their insurance payment will look like. It's not something that anyone here is going to be able to answer for you. Two minor convictions likely wont push you into a "high risk" category. However, all bets are off with one serious conviction. You're also going to be walking a tight rope for the next three years because one more conviction will likely change that.
Insurance will split all convictions into three categories. Those are minor, major, serious.
Typically, these are how speeding convictions are split.
Minor - Speeding - any type, except when listed as major or serious.
Major - Improper passing/speeding in a school or playground zone.
Serious - Speeding 50 kph or more over the speed limit.
The exemption would be speeding when it's considered stunting. Since the new rules recently went in, speeding 40+ in an 80 or less zone could now be considered stunting. That would fall into the serious category regardless if it was 40-49.
Lots of people ask what their insurance payment will look like. It's not something that anyone here is going to be able to answer for you.
Two minor convictions likely wont push you into a "high risk" category. However, all bets are off with one serious conviction. You're also going to be walking a tight rope for the next three years because one more conviction will likely change that.
On the ticket it said speeding 149km/h in a 100 km/h and it's $359 total payable. So in that scenario I got lucky that it won't fall under the serious conviction for the exemption that you listed? I'm basically looking at 2 minor infractions is that correct? And yes point definitely taken, I will have to be driving on best behaviour to not get put over the edge with another infraction, which is normally how I drive it was just a 1 time out of character scenario for me.
On the ticket it said speeding 149km/h in a 100 km/h and it's $359 total payable. So in that scenario I got lucky that it won't fall under the serious conviction for the exemption that you listed?
I'm basically looking at 2 minor infractions is that correct?
And yes point definitely taken, I will have to be driving on best behaviour to not get put over the edge with another infraction, which is normally how I drive it was just a 1 time out of character scenario for me.
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS…
In June at 401 London and Wellington I got hit twice, speeding which I didn't realize I was doing and cell phone. The Officer made me open my purse and show him my phone. I was going to meet a Rep of my Company in Kitchener, he called I answered. WRONG! The Officer wasn't even nice. My record…
I'm going to preface this with a little concern....I know that at least one moderator on this forum is likely a co-worker of the officer who tagged me. I'm hoping that by being involved here, this moderator is already acting unbiased towards incidents he/she is not directly involved in. Also…
I received a ticket the other day that has my wrong name, wrong address and wrong set fine amount. Is the best thing to do default on it and hope it is quashed and if it isn't file for appeal as per London v. Young ?
Also for an incorrect offence or an offence "not known to law." as an example :
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could…
I got a ticket for going 20 km/h over 50 in Toronto around March of last year and received my court summons for a hearing in February 2012 approx. 3 weeks ago. Mailed out a request for disclosure a week after that. It's now been 2 and a 1/2 weeks since the request and I was…