Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Had a trial date. It was 5 tickets all together along with the ones we discussed earlier in these posts.
Prosecutor was withdrawing the charges on 3 tickets (which was minor without any points) but not other 2. One of them was accumulating 2 points on CV…
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) The driver did not get the ticket for unsafe vehicle.
It was dump truck and the registered gross weigh was 11,000 kg (according to officer notes)
Got the disclosure. Officer provided copy of the log book page but kept the original.
No inspection report …
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) I understand, just trying to know the facts so if needed, can defend this issue.
Just found: Record keeping requirements under Highway Traffic Act
ONTARIO REGULATION 199/07
COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTIONS
SCHEDULE 1
DAILY INSPECTION OF TRUCKS, TRA…
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Well, I am trying to find something on Ministry's website which can be referred that officer can not tear off the log book page. But thanks for tons of info.
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Actually Driver was charged for fail to note defect on trip log also (under HTA 107 (8) (A) for that defect we was talking about earlier.
There was no defect in the vehicle when driver did the inspection in the morning before starting his trip.
So office…
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Is there any legal provision can be offered for this? How this will be proved or say in the court that a police officer can not or not suppose to take any copy of the log book.
Please provide your opinion.
Thanks
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) But no inspection report was provided afterwards also. Officer just tear off the top white page (original copy- since log book has duplicate yellow copy along with the original) from the log book and took that original copy with him.
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) oh! officer did not provide any inspection report. he just ask the driver to put the truck in drive (first) gear. Driver did that. The truck did not move and then officer asked the driver to press the accelerator, the truck moved when the accelerator was …
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Sorry my mistake. there were two tickets, one to driver, one to company (CVOR)
Driver charged with 107 (11) and Company charged with 107 (3)
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Thanks ShrekTec and screeech.
You are right.
But here in this case, on the offence notice, charged under 107 (3)
and it cost 2 points under Conviction Code Table
Thanks
Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11) Received Offence Notice of Major Defect in comm. Veh. under HTA 107 (11). Will it cost any points? As per HTA Reg. O. Reg. 339/94 DEMERIT POINT SYSTEM I could not find this Sec. 107 (11) cost any points.
Does it means, no points?
Checked under ONTARIO RE…
Re: received summons for Part I careless driving Yes Car A got the Summons for careless driving. Car B driver was not charged.
It was a big hit , Car A got damaged so much and air bags were out. Car A driver was taken to hospital and police was not there until that time only fire and ambulance was the…
Re: received summons for Part I careless driving Thanks ShrekTec. It was so helpful.
Since I am new in this forum and taking so much time to figure it out that where and how to post reply.
I got the police report for careless driving summons.
The scenario was Car A (who got the summons) was driving on h…
Re: received summons for Part I careless driving ShrekTek wrote:A summons is NOT a trial. At the summons date the police officer will NOT be there, and you will only be asked how you want to plead to the charge.
You can plead guilty if want, but this is highly not recommended because careless carries t…
received summons for Part I careless driving If summons received for Part I offence "careless driving" and got the date of appearance on the summons, what is the next procedure?
