Viewing profile - pam
-
- pam’s recent activity
- Replies
- Views
- Date
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Had a trial date. It was 5 tickets all together along with the ones we discussed earlier in these posts. Prosecutor was withdrawing the charges on 3 tickets (which was minor witho… - 29 Replies
- 16685 Views
- Last post Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:16 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
The driver did not get the ticket for unsafe vehicle. It was dump truck and the registered gross weigh was 11,000 kg (according to officer notes) Got the disclosure. Officer provi… - 29 Replies
- 16685 Views
- Last post Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:41 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
I understand, just trying to know the facts so if needed, can defend this issue. Just found: Record keeping requirements under Highway Traffic Act ONTARIO REGULATION 199/07 COMM… - 29 Replies
- 16685 Views
- Last post Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:03 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Well, I am trying to find something on Ministry's website which can be referred that officer can not tear off the log book page. But thanks for tons of info. - 29 Replies
- 16685 Views
- Last post Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:25 am View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Major Defect in comm. Veh. HTA 107 (11)
Actually Driver was charged for fail to note defect on trip log also (under HTA 107 (8) (A) for that defect we was talking about earlier. There was no defect in the vehicle when d… - 29 Replies
- 16685 Views
- Last post Wed Jul 19, 2017 5:28 pm View the latest post
-