My son was returning from school and was just entering the driveway when another vehicle hit the rear end. Police writes a ticket "fail to yield from private drive" 139(i). He is going to fight this ticket and made an application for disclosure. The trial is next week and he still hasn't received the disclosure. He checked with the court last month and they said that they will call when disclosure is ready for pick up. What now? Your input is most valued. Thanks
My son was returning from school and was just entering the driveway when another vehicle hit the rear end. Police writes a ticket "fail to yield from private drive" 139(i). He is going to fight this ticket and made an application for disclosure. The trial is next week and he still hasn't received the disclosure.
He checked with the court last month and they said that they will call when disclosure is ready for pick up. What now? Your input is most valued.
If he hasn't received disclosure by the day of trial, he should notify the JP that he made an application for disclosure, but didn't get it. Bring proof that he made an attempt to get it. They should then adjourn to a later date. If your son made a reasonable attempt to obtain disclosure (sounds like he did make it early), then they should charge the delay to the Prosecutor. If they try to make you take a short delay to review the evidence, object and say that there is not enough time to adequately review it to make full answer and defence. How did the officer determine he failed to yield? The way you wrote it, it sounds like he was turning into the driveway and someone slammed into his rear end because either they were going too fast, following too closely or not paying attention. Is that what happened? Or was he exiting the driveway onto a road?
If he hasn't received disclosure by the day of trial, he should notify the JP that he made an application for disclosure, but didn't get it. Bring proof that he made an attempt to get it. They should then adjourn to a later date. If your son made a reasonable attempt to obtain disclosure (sounds like he did make it early), then they should charge the delay to the Prosecutor. If they try to make you take a short delay to review the evidence, object and say that there is not enough time to adequately review it to make full answer and defence.
How did the officer determine he failed to yield? The way you wrote it, it sounds like he was turning into the driveway and someone slammed into his rear end because either they were going too fast, following too closely or not paying attention. Is that what happened? Or was he exiting the driveway onto a road?
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Well, he was returning home with his lil sister when he had already turned halfway into the driveway, paused at driveway for a moment - about 5 seconds (as there were 2 cars already parked - driveway can park 4 cars) and then turned his wheel slighty and moving forward when the other vehicle hit the edge of the trunk like a swipe. The other vehicle driver got injured and must have told the officer that my son was backing out before being taken away by ambulance. This happened right in front of a school and the speed zone is 40. Also one of my friends was visiting me and he was outside having a smoke when this accident happened and is one of the witness along with my daughter. The officer told my son (and i was there) that although he doesn't want to charge him, Ministry rules say that he must charge someone for it and he believes my son should get the ticket. Could it be that officer didn't make any notes so there is no disclosure available yet? The insurance police report showed just a diagram of two boxes- car A hitting car B. My son made the request for disclosure on the same day he went to court to fight this ticket (which was within the 15 days) and they gave him the court date for trial.
Well, he was returning home with his lil sister when he had already turned halfway into the driveway, paused at driveway for a moment - about 5 seconds (as there were 2 cars already parked - driveway can park 4 cars) and then turned his wheel slighty and moving forward when the other vehicle hit the edge of the trunk like a swipe. The other vehicle driver got injured and must have told the officer that my son was backing out before being taken away by ambulance. This happened right in front of a school and the speed zone is 40. Also one of my friends was visiting me and he was outside having a smoke when this accident happened and is one of the witness along with my daughter. The officer told my son (and i was there) that although he doesn't want to charge him, Ministry rules say that he must charge someone for it and he believes my son should get the ticket. Could it be that officer didn't make any notes so there is no disclosure available yet? The insurance police report showed just a diagram of two boxes- car A hitting car B. My son made the request for disclosure on the same day he went to court to fight this ticket (which was within the 15 days) and they gave him the court date for trial.
Read this: http://www.simonborys.ca/2011/02/does-a ... -a-ticket/ Also is probably not the case that the delay is due to the officer not having written their notes yet. Officers write their notes at the time of the incident or shortly after.
SidinBram wrote:
The officer told my son (and i was there) that although he doesn't want to charge him, Ministry rules say that he must charge someone for it and he believes my son should get the ticket.
Also is probably not the case that the delay is due to the officer not having written their notes yet. Officers write their notes at the time of the incident or shortly after.
Well, as Simon says, that's wrong... Make sure all of the witnesses you have are present for court. The other driver should have been charged with Careless Driving, IMO.
SidinBram wrote:
The officer told my son (and i was there) that although he doesn't want to charge him, Ministry rules say that he must charge someone for it and he believes my son should get the ticket.
Well, as Simon says, that's wrong...
Make sure all of the witnesses you have are present for court. The other driver should have been charged with Careless Driving, IMO.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
We - son, witnesses and myself go to court this morning. Son asked prosecutor for disclosure and prosecutor went through papers and didn`t have any. Waited for police officer to show up - expecting officer might have notes. Officer does`nt show up and Crown withdraws charge. Where can I get the disclosure, as the insurance wanted to see them. Its costing me an arm and a leg in increased insurance since this accident. My son takes my car twice a week to school nearby and it would be cheaper to afford a limousine instead! Thanks you all for your comments and help.
We - son, witnesses and myself go to court this morning. Son asked prosecutor for disclosure and prosecutor went through papers and didn`t have any.
Waited for police officer to show up - expecting officer might have notes. Officer does`nt show up and Crown withdraws charge.
Where can I get the disclosure, as the insurance wanted to see them. Its costing me an arm and a leg in increased insurance since this accident.
My son takes my car twice a week to school nearby and it would be cheaper to afford a limousine instead!
If the charge has been withdrawn you won't receive disclosure. You'll have to file a freedom of information request through the police service instead. There's usually a fee associated with this so I'd have the insurance company look after it if they want the info.
If the charge has been withdrawn you won't receive disclosure. You'll have to file a freedom of information request through the police service instead. There's usually a fee associated with this so I'd have the insurance company look after it if they want the info.
Congrats on the charge being withdrawn. The issue with insurance isn't so much disclosure of the evidence, but the rules they use to determine who is at fault. Since the original police report states that your son was backing up (at least that's what I'd assume), they're going to continue relying upon that. They use Fault Determination Rules to determine "who is at fault," and not Highway Traffic Act infractions per se. I'm not sure exactly how to dispute it, given that the only person who said your son was reversing was the driver who hit him (well, no surprise)... but perhaps contacting the Financial Services Commission of Ontario would be a starting point. They oversee the insurance industry in Ontario. www.fsco.gov.on.ca
Congrats on the charge being withdrawn. The issue with insurance isn't so much disclosure of the evidence, but the rules they use to determine who is at fault. Since the original police report states that your son was backing up (at least that's what I'd assume), they're going to continue relying upon that. They use Fault Determination Rules to determine "who is at fault," and not Highway Traffic Act infractions per se. I'm not sure exactly how to dispute it, given that the only person who said your son was reversing was the driver who hit him (well, no surprise)... but perhaps contacting the Financial Services Commission of Ontario would be a starting point. They oversee the insurance industry in Ontario.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
So heres my case, does it have any validity? Im argueing that the officer did not have a justified view of where and if my car stopped or not, which it did.
This is the officers view of the stop sign i "disobeyed"
Another possible viewpoint, just so i can say that he cant see regardless
As you can see he cannot see the line where i must stop
As close are possible (which he wasnt) to the intersection,…
I need some help to settle a "Right of Way" argument. I know this question has probably been asked a thousand times before, but after doing a search, I was unable to find a posting on the forum, or the specific section in the OHTA relating to it.
Scenario:
Two cars approach an intersection where the east and westbound directions are controlled by stop signs, and the north and southbound…
I was pulled over for doing 123 in an 80 zone on highway 7 near Peterborough. The officer reduced it to 109 in an 80. It was HIGHLY unlikely that I was going 109, let alone 123, so for the merit of it I am taking this to court. Court case mid January.
Please could you help me to decipher the officer's notes. Are there any errors in the notes or on the ticket that you can see?
Ive already done searches, read the act as best i can but still haven't read a complete answer. Where in the HTA does it state that the front license plate must be attached to the front bumper? I have it on the passenger sun visor (if ppl remember the old temp permits that taped to the pass side of windshield) i figured that this spot would be the same. However now they have got rid of…
Was pulled over earlier today for going 95km/h in posted 60km/h, 2nd offense (same cop that pulled me over the first time >.<) ticket of $265. going down dougall toward cabana where it goes from the 80 to 60 zone (yes was over slightly coming in and kept speed)
Just wondering what the best way to handle this? (location: windsor ontario)
I am a bartender and last saturday night while I was working someone backed into my car (2000 Acura Integra) in the prking lot. One of the cooks in the kitchen ran to tell me my car alarm is going off. Immediately I ran outside to discover my driver side mirror smashed on the ground and my driver door dented. There was nobody around to claim responsibility. I had already begun to suspect one…
Scenario regarding speeding charge - if a charge is not reduced at all at roadside, i.e. the charge, for example is "speeding 75 km/h in a 60 km/h zone contrary to s. 128," should that not mean the prosecution needs to prove that you are guilty of what you are being charged with, and not, simply, of speeding generally? I understand that if they prove a charge of even 61 km/h in a 60 km/h, they…
In a nutshell, in York Region, ran a stale yellow, cop was on a 407 off ramp and tickets me for red light. 2 week old pink slip, I forgot I put the new behind the expired one so I got a ticket for that as well.
Had the first court date adjourned because I did not receive disclosure. I used the Ticketcombat template and faxed it over, they told me I never left a phone number. No surprise there, I…
Was stopped in an OPP speed trap on eastbound QEW near Hamilton at 1:30 AM last week (Apr 25th). Officer said I was doing 131 km/h based on radar gun but I thought I was around 120 km/h (I let off the gas and looked at my speedo when I saw the 2 cars on the shoulder). It was a dark stretch and it was not busy but there were a few other cars on the highway. I asked to see the reading but they said…
1) Discovery info includes 3 pages of Genesis radar manual. Officer's notes show he used "Atlantic Laser" to measure speed. Didn't show model # (only s/n). The Genesis was used earlier on in the day, but not for my case. Can I grill him on this or is it simply a clerk's error in sending me the wrong manual?
I got a ticket for an expired licence sticker. The next day I went to the Ministry office to renew my sticker. I thought that I HAD to pay any outstanding tickets BEFORE I was eligible to renew my sticker. The lady at the desk informed me that I had an outstanding balance and 407 bill that I had a to pay and I told her that I was aware of that. I thought everything was cleared.
Last week I was driving though downtown and because of the slippery / wet conditions could not stop when the light was turning yellow to red and slid in to the intersection. I was hit by another car (near the headlamp). None of us were injured, there was significat damge to the cars. The air bags did not deploy.
I was given a ticket that reads : Red Light - fail to stop - H.T.A sect 144 (18) Fine…
I was just wondering if there was any text in the HTA that suggests that when driving on a highway with three lanes going in each direction, drivers should generally always be in the rightmost lane unless they are passing.
At first, I thought 154(b) was what I was looking for, but now I'm not so sure?
"Officials in West Vancouver, Canada apparently aren't satisfied with the driver-slowing properties of traditional speed bumps. Yesterday, the town unveiled a new way to entice motorists to ease off the gas pedal in the vicinity of the ÃÂcole Pauline Johnson Elementary School: A 2-D image of a child playing, creating the illusion that…
Does anybody know how you can check the status of your Demerit Points and how many you have collected over the last two years?
I just received a ticket as I was travelling through Barrie and am debating whether or not to fight it. My decision will be based on whether or not an infraction I received a year ago came with Demerit Points.
I have a question I would like to ask concerning turning right on a red light.
I was approaching on the right turn only lane to the traffic light which turned from amber to red. As soon as the red light came on, there were advance green left turn arrow for the intersection I was for the cars that were traveling right to left and left to right of me. Since there was a lot of traffic from where I…
So I got pulled over for speeding and following too close, on HWY 11 north of Barrie. The airplane caught me! I will fight this as I have fought ALL my tickets and won EVERY ONE of them (one per year... man I need to drive slower). So any thoughts out there on how to fight this one? Does the Crown have to bring the 2 officers in the plane, plus the one in the cruises to court? If 1 in 3 doesn't…
I am new to this forum and before making this post I did some digging and was unable to find anything on this method of officer note taking.
A little back ground of my case:
charged with 25km/h over the posted limit.
After numerous disclosure requests, finally received a detailed disclosure including several pages of the lidar manual and typed officer notes describing the events of my…
My wife was just pulled over for running a yellow light and instead was ticketed for an expired drivers licence. The license expired on her birthdate 4 months ago and she didn;t recieve a renewal. $325 !!!!!!
Hope someone can help. She was ticketed under HTA 32 (1) with the offense shown as
"Drive Motor Vehicle no license"
Can anyone tell me if this is worth the effort to get a reduction in the…
So I got pulled over for supposedly for running a stop sign. The problem is that I did a complete stop, waited a split second and started again. And yes I did stop behind the white line.
He took my information and went back to his car to write me up a ticket, came back and gave me my fine and explained to me the process. He gave me a reduced fine (65$ and ne points).
Someone has an accident in a car worth very little on highway 401 but the car is not drivable (but not in terrible shape), there is a police report filed right away in which no other cars were involved, however the car did strike a guardrail. Is it possible to handle this without involving insurance? Or is a forgone conclusion insurance will be notified by the police?
I made a minor mistake on my disclosure request - I put a "Request Date" of September 10, 2014 instead of 2015. The rest of the form is correct including offense date, fax date, trial date.
Will this affect my disclosure? Do I need to clear it up?
Also, I noticed the Ticket Combat disclosure form has a lot more information than what was posted in on this site. Is it OK to send a second…