http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/yahoocanada/ ... e_children "Officials in West Vancouver, Canada apparently aren't satisfied with the driver-slowing properties of traditional speed bumps. Yesterday, the town unveiled a new way to entice motorists to ease off the gas pedal in the vicinity of the École Pauline Johnson Elementary School: A 2-D image of a child playing, creating the illusion that the approaching driver will soon blast into a child...." I think this would just freak me out more than anything.... I have seen some speed bumps at universities and other places that look like very large bumps but are illusions...that is better than seeing a child play with a ball in my opinion. Is this a good idea? Will it help with reducing speed? Or can it cause more confusion?
"Officials in West Vancouver, Canada apparently aren't satisfied with the driver-slowing properties of traditional speed bumps. Yesterday, the town unveiled a new way to entice motorists to ease off the gas pedal in the vicinity of the École Pauline Johnson Elementary School: A 2-D image of a child playing, creating the illusion that the approaching driver will soon blast into a child...."
I think this would just freak me out more than anything....
I have seen some speed bumps at universities and other places that look like very large bumps but are illusions...that is better than seeing a child play with a ball in my opinion.
Is this a good idea? Will it help with reducing speed? Or can it cause more confusion?
Last edited by admin on Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
WTF??!!?? Why doesn't the GOVN'T just train the drivers better. I said it before and I'll say it again...... better training will do more for the whole then pictogragh speed bumps, rumble strips or 50 over laws. And while I'm ranting why do police get the opportunity to drink then perform a breathalyzer but the general public, the bigger problem, just get a ticket. Bass ackwards approaches are slowly sinking our society into a non-thinking continuous daze that is, using the "we need a law cause the general public's common sense has deterierated to the point of howgivesafook" point of view, washing away any and all responsibility toward our fellow man. Respect for others has taken another step backwards.
WTF??!!??
Why doesn't the GOVN'T just train the drivers better. I said it before and I'll say it again...... better training will do more for the whole then pictogragh speed bumps, rumble strips or 50 over laws. And while I'm ranting why do police get the opportunity to drink then perform a breathalyzer but the general public, the bigger problem, just get a ticket. Bass ackwards approaches are slowly sinking our society into a non-thinking continuous daze that is, using the "we need a law cause the general public's common sense has deterierated to the point of howgivesafook" point of view, washing away any and all responsibility toward our fellow man.
Respect for others has taken another step backwards.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
It is a crazy idea to do this ... I would rather see the government do Public Service Announcements telling people to SLOW THE HELL DOWN in school zones, rather than be desensitized with fake children playing on the road. There is also a concern in the article about how this will affect drivers abilities to distinguish the differences from real or fake children, given the fact that the driver at one point will RUN OVER THE FAKE KID LOL!!!! Insane idea...but who knows..it might work!
It is a crazy idea to do this ...
I would rather see the government do Public Service Announcements telling people to SLOW THE HELL DOWN in school zones, rather than be desensitized with fake children playing on the road.
There is also a concern in the article about how this will affect drivers abilities to distinguish the differences from real or fake children, given the fact that the driver at one point will RUN OVER THE FAKE KID LOL!!!!
:?: :?: that speed bump might work the wrong way....after a few times the people will slow down, but the drivers become to accustom to that and when a real child runs out....just keep on driving and not really stop?
Reflections wrote:
. And while I'm ranting why do police get the opportunity to drink then perform a breathalyzer but the general public, the bigger problem, just get a ticket. .
that speed bump might work the wrong way....after a few times the people will slow down, but the drivers become to accustom to that and when a real child runs out....just keep on driving and not really stop?
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Oh... my... God. Just when I thought gov't officials couldn't possibly come up with dumber ideas than some of the ones we already have in place, this happens. That's what I'm afraid of. "Oh, that's just a hologram..." THUD. "OH, wait, that one's real... oops..." :shock: +1
Oh... my... God.
Just when I thought gov't officials couldn't possibly come up with dumber ideas than some of the ones we already have in place, this happens.
hwybear wrote:
that speed bump might work the wrong way....after a few times the people will slow down, but the drivers become to accustom to that and when a real child runs out....just keep on driving and not really stop?
That's what I'm afraid of.
"Oh, that's just a hologram..." THUD. "OH, wait, that one's real... oops..."
Reflections wrote:
I said it before and I'll say it again...... better training will do more for the whole then pictogragh speed bumps, rumble strips or 50 over laws.
+1
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
:?: :?: that speed bump might work the wrong way....after a few times the people will slow down, but the drivers become to accustom to that and when a real child runs out....just keep on driving and not really stop? Officers have some direct knowledge of what 50mg feels like. I remember you telling us that part of your training was downing some happy juice and performing the tests. The general public gets nothing. I know though, if you're not sure don't drive....blah, blah.......insert sad MADD comercial here.
hwybear wrote:
Reflections wrote:
. And while I'm ranting why do police get the opportunity to drink then perform a breathalyzer but the general public, the bigger problem, just get a ticket. .
that speed bump might work the wrong way....after a few times the people will slow down, but the drivers become to accustom to that and when a real child runs out....just keep on driving and not really stop?
Officers have some direct knowledge of what 50mg feels like. I remember you telling us that part of your training was downing some happy juice and performing the tests. The general public gets nothing.
I know though, if you're not sure don't drive....blah, blah.......insert sad MADD comercial here.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
:?: :?: ? Officers have some direct knowledge of what 50mg feels like. I remember you telling us that part of your training was downing some happy juice and performing the tests. The general public gets nothing. I know though, if you're not sure don't drive....blah, blah.......insert sad MADD comercial here. The testing/knowledge that you speak of is not every officer thou. It is for those that are actually Intoxilyzer Technicians. During the learning of the course (theory, parts of instrument, etc) one has to learn the displays, how to retrieve a sample, inputs of info. So there has to be "test subjects" which drink in order to do tests and learn the instrument..
Reflections wrote:
hwybear wrote:
Reflections wrote:
. And while I'm ranting why do police get the opportunity to drink then perform a breathalyzer but the general public, the bigger problem, just get a ticket. .
?
Officers have some direct knowledge of what 50mg feels like. I remember you telling us that part of your training was downing some happy juice and performing the tests. The general public gets nothing.
I know though, if you're not sure don't drive....blah, blah.......insert sad MADD comercial here.
The testing/knowledge that you speak of is not every officer thou. It is for those that are actually Intoxilyzer Technicians. During the learning of the course (theory, parts of instrument, etc) one has to learn the displays, how to retrieve a sample, inputs of info. So there has to be "test subjects" which drink in order to do tests and learn the instrument..
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
A good reference is to use the number 15, which is an average for all persons and alcohol. Every drink consumed adds in 15mgs of alcohol, however there are variables for that such as light,normal high test beers - was it actually one measured ounce of liquor etc.. Every hour the body eliminates 15mgs of alcohol. eg: 4 drinks in one hour = 60mgs less 15mgs for the hour, would be 45mgs remaining. Have to remember the actual number reading is for an "Over 80mgs" charge and in NO way affects an "Impaired Charge".
A good reference is to use the number 15, which is an average for all persons and alcohol. Every drink consumed adds in 15mgs of alcohol, however there are variables for that such as light,normal high test beers - was it actually one measured ounce of liquor etc..
Every hour the body eliminates 15mgs of alcohol.
eg: 4 drinks in one hour = 60mgs less 15mgs for the hour, would be 45mgs remaining.
Have to remember the actual number reading is for an "Over 80mgs" charge and in NO way affects an "Impaired Charge".
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I thought that it was .022 per drink. I agree with the .015 per hour elimination though. 4 drinks in an hour would be .088 - .015= .073 Above for 160 pound man. Years ago the police used to release a chart like that. Cheers Viper1
I thought that it was .022 per drink.
I agree with the .015 per hour elimination though.
4 drinks in an hour would be .088 - .015= .073
Above for 160 pound man.
Years ago the police used to release a chart like that.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
We bring in volunteers for our courses. You do need to know a cop so you know when the call out goes. On my intoxilyzer 8000C course( for lack of a better term it is what most call the breathalyzer machine) I drank what I would in a typical night, 5 drinks of rum . I thought I was going to blow over 100 as i felt like i was obliterated. There was no way I would have driven. I blew a high of 62. The this i also learned is there is no set pattern such as 1 drink per hour. That as it really is individual. We had one seasoned drinker that had 10 drinks and only blew a warn and a small female that he 5 and hit almost 200. Best policy is anymore than one drink take a cab as that is a whole lot less than an impaired charge. That is what I do now that I know. When people talk that they only blew an 80 i know know that for most people that is smashed ops
We bring in volunteers for our courses. You do need to know a cop so you know when the call out goes.
On my intoxilyzer 8000C course( for lack of a better term it is what most call the breathalyzer machine) I drank what I would in a typical night, 5 drinks of rum . I thought I was going to blow over 100 as i felt like i was obliterated. There was no way I would have driven. I blew a high of 62.
The this i also learned is there is no set pattern such as 1 drink per hour. That as it really is individual. We had one seasoned drinker that had 10 drinks and only blew a warn and a small female that he 5 and hit almost 200.
Best policy is anymore than one drink take a cab as that is a whole lot less than an impaired charge. That is what I do now that I know.
When people talk that they only blew an 80 i know know that for most people that is smashed
I think what I lean towards is that the general public might benefit from a sitdown with a bottle and an Intoxilyzer just to see what the "numbers" feel like.
When people talk that they only blew an 80 i know know that for most people that is smashed
I think what I lean towards is that the general public might benefit from a sitdown with a bottle and an Intoxilyzer just to see what the "numbers" feel like.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
I think what I lean towards is that the general public might benefit from a sitdown with a bottle and an Intoxilyzer just to see what the "numbers" feel like. Are you going to pay for it. People scream when they find out how many cruisers are bought. So who will pay for the instruments and operators? There are not many courses that many volunteers could be solicited. This year we ran 1 course. OPS
Reflections wrote:
When people talk that they only blew an 80 i know know that for most people that is smashed
I think what I lean towards is that the general public might benefit from a sitdown with a bottle and an Intoxilyzer just to see what the "numbers" feel like.
Are you going to pay for it. People scream when they find out how many cruisers are bought. So who will pay for the instruments and operators?
There are not many courses that many volunteers could be solicited. This year we ran 1 course.
ok well here is my story .. I had an old megaphone from alarm system and decided since my horns on my car were rusted and were not making a loud enough sound.. i connected the alarm megaphone to the horn wires and it sounded very cool. depending on how log i hold my horn down for . due to the size of the power horn.. and mhy car being a Honda.. meaning no room under the hood i had installed it…
So I got this ticket because the lady behind me was WAY too close and I had to back up before getting hit by another car and dented her bumper.
Offense is stated as follows: Start from Stopped position - Not in Safety
Highway Traffic Act 142 (2)
First of all, I don't really know what that means and if it says that I was not in safety (which I wasn't) why am I getting a ticket? And why didn't the…
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly reached into my bag to grab a lip balm. I noticed I had brought the wrong one so I just kept it out and…
It happened last December. I was facing north in the middle of the intersection at Donmills and McNicoll waiting to make a left turn. There was a big white van on the other side of McNicoll facing south waiting to turn left too. When the light changed to amber, I checked and the road was clear, there was no upcoming vehicle. So slowly I made the left turn. Suddenly a small car dashed up from…
First off, the most similar case and HELPFUL thread has y far come from neo333: a great read and very similar and relevant to my case and of course ticketcombat.com
I'll cole's notes this so that it can be concise and can recap my experience with disclosure, notes and failed stay request and adjourned court date. Thank you for reading and leaving your opinion.
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
Got my first ticket last Thursday and I have a couple of questions. I was driving westbound on Moore St. (west of Bayview) and made a left onto a residential street at a 4-way stop sign. It was my first time driving through that area - was driving my girlfriend to a wisdom tooth surgery.
The police were set up to catch people, as that intersection had a no left turn sign from 7-9 am (buses…
I was in a light collision with a police vehicle last November and will be having a trial by the end of the month. What happened was I was pulled over. I stopped and kept my right signal on. The cop car then tried to pull behind me when he was on my left but 2 cars pulled behind me. The cop wasn't too smart and instead of waiting for the two cars to pull away, he drove forward and boxed all the…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a ticket in the mail. The ticket is under my name as the registered owner: charged with Fail to Stop for…
I have just got a ticket (Fail to yield on through highway) and by the way it's me first ticket and this is how I got it.
Me driving in a residential neighborhood maybe 10-15 km/h approaching a stop sign completely stopped at the stop sign started moving again turning right and out of nowhere I was hit by this van. he went directly to the driver's side fender,wheel, and bumper. Since it was my…
Hi I'm new to this forum but I hope I'm bringing you all good news.
I recently wrote a book short titled ABUSE OF POWER
This book is all about how the Ontario government broke the law to enact the new street racing legislation.
To start with the denial of the right to remain innocent until proven guilty was enacted without due process under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How it wasn't done…
So i lent my car to my gf the other day and she went to drop her friend at a Go station but when she was turning left into the parking lot at the Go station a bus hits her from behind while she was turning so now my rear fender is pushed in and more scrathes and my bumper is damaged...but the cop that showed up just kept telling my gf thats its her fault cause its private property...is that true…
Hi, thanks for reading. I've read a bunch of articles online and searched the forum to try and find my answers but I'm still unsure so I'm creating a new thread.
I was following a car that was going SUPER fast down the DVP but I got pulled over. I was speeding, too; however I don't want to use the "you got the wrong guy" defence because I'll probably lose.
I left my home at 4 am to pick up my daughter from downtown Toronto. When I passed the major intersection south of my house there were two police cars in the middle of the intersection and one officer waved me through the intersection.
When I returned with my daughter at 5:30 am the police cars were still in the intersection. I slowed down as I approached the intersection but the police were no…
I will be representing my wife at her speeding trial next week. Mostly everything is pretty much run of the mill but since she wasn't speeding we will be having her take the stand. Since this opens up the opportunity for the prosecutor to cross examine, I am just wondering if anyone here knows what kind of questions we should expect from the prosecutor in order to best prepare.
When the court sends out the notice of trial, do they use the address the officer wrote on the ticket, or the actual address in the MTO database? In the case of the former, what are the implications? The reason I ask is that my wife got a ticket last week and the officer wrote the wrong city on it.
This topic discusses the same thing but with CN police; is it any different for regular offences?
Driving onto ramp entering a major highway, posted limit is 100km/h, suggested ramp limit is 40km/h - I end up colliding with the concrete barrier on the passenger side of the vehicle.
Police arrive, suspect alcohol and breathalyze me with a result of 0.00 - I am asked for a statement and cautioned, however (stupidly) I proceed to provide the details anyways.
My friends and I were heading to Kelso Beach, I had signalled and i pulled off to the shoulder as my car seemed to be making noise, but after riding over the shoulder the noise stopped, i signalled back again and merged back into traffic after making sure it was safe, the officer which was ahead of me on the shoulder a few meters away pulled me over.…
I've decided to fight a traffic ticket for stop sign violation. The offense was 12 months ago, and I've got a court date for next Tuesday. I've requested disclosure and, although a bit last minute, received it two weeks before my court date.
Upon reviewing the case materials, there isn't much of a defense I can find -based on the cop having an obstructed view, or any mistakes in the…
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I'm a newbie, so be kind if I'm messing up. Question: is it illegal to signal oncoming traffic that they are approaching a speed trap by flashing one's lights?
I ask because I was stopped for doing that yesterday evening, but did not end up with a ticket. The officer spend 5-10 minutes n his car, then sent me on my way. I'm wondering if he changed his mind or found out it was legal.