Hi everyone, I witnessed an accident on hwy 401 last year and stopped to help - cop took my information down and I received a court order few months back to show up in a hearing as a witness in August. I have a very very busy schedule and I am self employed. I charge $250 / hour in consultation. Am I entitled to any payments to show up? I'd rather not show up at all since there are more witnesses unless they can afford me. What is the process for me to put the word out to them? Thanks
Hi everyone,
I witnessed an accident on hwy 401 last year and stopped to help - cop took my information down and I received a court order few months back to show up in a hearing as a witness in August. I have a very very busy schedule and I am self employed. I charge $250 / hour in consultation. Am I entitled to any payments to show up? I'd rather not show up at all since there are more witnesses unless they can afford me. What is the process for me to put the word out to them?
Depending on how far you have to travel to the court, they may pay mileage in some areas. And if you simply don't show up a warrant may be issued for your arrest.
Depending on how far you have to travel to the court, they may pay mileage in some areas. And if you simply don't show up a warrant may be issued for your arrest.
A business trip doesn't come before a subpoena to court. It's your responsibility to contact the prosecutor with any of your concerns about your court appearance.
A business trip doesn't come before a subpoena to court. It's your responsibility to contact the prosecutor with any of your concerns about your court appearance.
I sure hope that your are never the "victim" of a collision and the witness does not want to appear in court. Even better if it is a he said/she said where the witness is the only one who can get the blame off of you. Because then you will see just whats it like to get screwed. We had a JP here issue witness warrants for all the missing witnesses. We had a grand old time going and arresting and taking them to jail. All these people who were to busy sure made time when the spent 18 hours in jail waiting for court. We also made sure that we attended their places of work to arrest them. (which is totally allowed as you do not get to chose the time or place to get arrested and rarely is it convenient ). And remember the warrants never dissappear. You could have a trip booked to a vacation and get hooked up at the airport. I am going to guess in most cases the vacation is ruined.(again happens lots in the winter here) I wish it happened more. OPS
I sure hope that your are never the "victim" of a collision and the witness does not want to appear in court. Even better if it is a he said/she said where the witness is the only one who can get the blame off of you.
Because then you will see just whats it like to get screwed.
We had a JP here issue witness warrants for all the missing witnesses. We had a grand old time going and arresting and taking them to jail. All these people who were to busy sure made time when the spent 18 hours in jail waiting for court. We also made sure that we attended their places of work to arrest them. (which is totally allowed as you do not get to chose the time or place to get arrested and rarely is it convenient ). And remember the warrants never dissappear. You could have a trip booked to a vacation and get hooked up at the airport. I am going to guess in most cases the vacation is ruined.(again happens lots in the winter here)
Not to hijack this thread, but I have a hypothetical question regarding witnesses. A witness gives a statement at the scene of the incident, but the defendant doesn't agree with the "facts" detailed in the witness statement. At trial, if the witness does not show, can the prosecution simply rely on the statement given. Or, perhaps, is the trial postponed until the witness is present?
Not to hijack this thread, but I have a hypothetical question regarding witnesses.
A witness gives a statement at the scene of the incident, but the defendant doesn't agree with the "facts" detailed in the witness statement. At trial, if the witness does not show, can the prosecution simply rely on the statement given. Or, perhaps, is the trial postponed until the witness is present?
The prosecution would need to have the witness present to testify. The defence needs to able to question/cross examine the witness, something not possible with a written statement.
MegaSilver wrote:
Not to hijack this thread, but I have a hypothetical question regarding witnesses.
A witness gives a statement at the scene of the incident, but the defendant doesn't agree with the "facts" detailed in the witness statement. At trial, if the witness does not show, can the prosecution simply rely on the statement given. Or, perhaps, is the trial postponed until the witness is present?
The prosecution would need to have the witness present to testify. The defence needs to able to question/cross examine the witness, something not possible with a written statement.
Insurance companies makes tones of money from everyone. Justice department gets paid well from many different sources. A good person stopping and signing a paper to be a witness is not treated well. There is simply no incentive to stop and become a witness. The court order surely won't be the end of it as then the civil case comes a long...
Insurance companies makes tones of money from everyone. Justice department gets paid well from many different sources. A good person stopping and signing a paper to be a witness is not treated well. There is simply no incentive to stop and become a witness. The court order surely won't be the end of it as then the civil case comes a long...
Except for human decency and a sense of community.
boardposter wrote:
Insurance companies makes tones of money from everyone. Justice department gets paid well from many different sources. A good person stopping and signing a paper to be a witness is not treated well. There is simply no incentive to stop and become a witness. The court order surely won't be the end of it as then the civil case comes a long...
Except for human decency and a sense of community.
People employed in professions related to an accident, and those that witness an accident are apples and oranges. Private citizens stop at an accident to render aid and if they witnessed the accident to provide an impartial account. I do so, and I hope others have the courtesy to do so when and if I am involved in an accident. A "good" person does whats right because it is what's right, not because they are hoping to be compensated for it, or compelled to do it. I've witnessed a number of accidents when on my own time and have stopped, assisted where possible and provided a written statement to the attending Officer. Most of these matters were resolved with no further need for my involvement. On the other side of the coin I have been involved in accidents where people failed to stop and assist, and witnesses left not wanting to get involved. THESE matters turn into a "he said, she said" and are much more labour intensive for police and the insurance companies. All I can say is that I hope any witnesses to an accident YOU are involved in are more community minded than you are.
boardposter wrote:
Insurance companies makes tones of money from everyone. Justice department gets paid well from many different sources.
People employed in professions related to an accident, and those that witness an accident are apples and oranges. Private citizens stop at an accident to render aid and if they witnessed the accident to provide an impartial account. I do so, and I hope others have the courtesy to do so when and if I am involved in an accident.
boardposter wrote:
A good person stopping and signing a paper to be a witness is not treated well. There is simply no incentive to stop and become a witness. The court order surely won't be the end of it as then the civil case comes a long...
A "good" person does whats right because it is what's right, not because they are hoping to be compensated for it, or compelled to do it.
I've witnessed a number of accidents when on my own time and have stopped, assisted where possible and provided a written statement to the attending Officer. Most of these matters were resolved with no further need for my involvement.
On the other side of the coin I have been involved in accidents where people failed to stop and assist, and witnesses left not wanting to get involved. THESE matters turn into a "he said, she said" and are much more labour intensive for police and the insurance companies.
All I can say is that I hope any witnesses to an accident YOU are involved in are more community minded than you are.
Why on earth would you wish such misery on people? How is it making this a better province if some poor bugger can't go to Orlando 12 years after he failed to attend a hearing over a $500 bent fender? Should executing an arrest warrant really be "a grand old time?" I can't say I'm very sorry to see the use of the past tense in this.
OPS Copper wrote:
We had a JP here issue witness warrants for all the missing witnesses. We had a grand old time going and arresting and taking them to jail. All these people who were to busy sure made time when the spent 18 hours in jail waiting for court. We also made sure that we attended their places of work to arrest them. (which is totally allowed as you do not get to chose the time or place to get arrested and rarely is it convenient ). And remember the warrants never dissappear. You could have a trip booked to a vacation and get hooked up at the airport. I am going to guess in most cases the vacation is ruined.(again happens lots in the winter here)
I wish it happened more.
OPS
Why on earth would you wish such misery on people? How is it making this a better province if some poor bugger can't go to Orlando 12 years after he failed to attend a hearing over a $500 bent fender? Should executing an arrest warrant really be "a grand old time?" I can't say I'm very sorry to see the use of the past tense in this.
You're in traffic on the highway and you're patiently waiting. The road is on a slight hill. The driver in front of you starts moving in reverse into your car. Who is at fault? Clearly the driver in front because he's carelessly moving backwards. Guess what? He doesn't see it that way. He is claiming you slammed into him while he was stopped. Who do you think the insurance company is going to believe? Not you. The driver behind is always at fault. Now the driver who rolled into you just filed an insurance claim with his company and is looking to get paid on your behalf. You're now looking at a possible ticket and an insurance increase for many years. It happened to Herman Sham. Mr. Sham was traveling on the 401 when traffic came to a complete stop. The driver in front of him, Ragurub Yogarajah, rolled backwards till he hit the car behind him. Ragurub denied the whole thing and was claiming he was hit from behind. He stuck to his story all the way to the insurance company when he filed a claim against Mr. Sham. Luckily, Mr. Sham was equipped with a dash cam and had the whole ordeal on film. Ragurub Yogarajah allegedly had 26 Highway Traffic Act violations on his record and allegedly had family working in the massage therapy business in Markham which conveniently has a commercial on youtube advertising the fact that insurance will gladly cover your costs from an auto accident. Because of Mr. Sham's dash cam, Mr. Yogarajah was eventually charged with fraud. Despite taking place on the 401 in the middle of traffic, you know how many witnesses stopped? ZERO. If there were no dash cams involved , Mr. Sham would be looking at charges under the HTA, serious insurance increases for many years, loss of income, and many sleepless nights. This is why you suck it up and attend trials. You should be proud to be a witness.
hk111 wrote:
Why on earth would you wish such misery on people? How is it making this a better province if some poor bugger can't go to Orlando 12 years after he failed to attend a hearing over a $500 bent fender? Should executing an arrest warrant really be "a grand old time?" I can't say I'm very sorry to see the use of the past tense in this.
You're in traffic on the highway and you're patiently waiting. The road is on a slight hill. The driver in front of you starts moving in reverse into your car. Who is at fault? Clearly the driver in front because he's carelessly moving backwards. Guess what? He doesn't see it that way. He is claiming you slammed into him while he was stopped. Who do you think the insurance company is going to believe? Not you. The driver behind is always at fault. Now the driver who rolled into you just filed an insurance claim with his company and is looking to get paid on your behalf. You're now looking at a possible ticket and an insurance increase for many years.
It happened to Herman Sham. Mr. Sham was traveling on the 401 when traffic came to a complete stop. The driver in front of him, Ragurub Yogarajah, rolled backwards till he hit the car behind him. Ragurub denied the whole thing and was claiming he was hit from behind. He stuck to his story all the way to the insurance company when he filed a claim against Mr. Sham. Luckily, Mr. Sham was equipped with a dash cam and had the whole ordeal on film.
Ragurub Yogarajah allegedly had 26 Highway Traffic Act violations on his record and allegedly had family working in the massage therapy business in Markham which conveniently has a commercial on youtube advertising the fact that insurance will gladly cover your costs from an auto accident. Because of Mr. Sham's dash cam, Mr. Yogarajah was eventually charged with fraud.
Despite taking place on the 401 in the middle of traffic, you know how many witnesses stopped? ZERO. If there were no dash cams involved , Mr. Sham would be looking at charges under the HTA, serious insurance increases for many years, loss of income, and many sleepless nights. This is why you suck it up and attend trials. You should be proud to be a witness.
Because I believe in the system and believe there should be consequences to actions. When courts say you must show up for court and don't a warrant is a consequence. And I won't lose any sleep over someone missing a vacation because they did not want to go to court. It is not about making the province better. It's about respecting the justice system. A summons is not a request to come to court. Simple. Show up in court when you are ordered to and you won't miss a vacation. Ops
Because I believe in the system and believe there should be consequences to actions. When courts say you must show up for court and don't a warrant is a consequence. And I won't lose any sleep over someone missing a vacation because they did not want to go to court.
It is not about making the province better. It's about respecting the justice system.
A summons is not a request to come to court.
Simple. Show up in court when you are ordered to and you won't miss a vacation.
I searched but could not retrieve a satisfactory answer.
It seems matter-of-fact that all sorts of work equipment, namely backhoes, loaders and other similar mororized vehicles without licence plates, sometimes equipped with a slow moving vehicle sign, often not, some with an amber beacon, some without, are encountered on a highway, travelling under their own power, sometimes on multi-lane roads…
Hello everyone I'm not sure if this is the right place to put it but I need some answers as I'm very scared and don't know what to do. Recently if got a Novice Driver B.A.C Above zero I am 23 years old and I'm pretty due to get my G class license in a couple of weeks. I understand that I was wrong for drinking a beer and half and driving with a G2 Class license.
I have been reading Fight Your Traffic Ticket site and have a couple of comments.
I was issued two tickets at the same time, one for invalid left turn (Hwy 7 in Markham and Swansea). Another one, because the officer did not like my copy of registration documents.
I am planning to challenge it in the court. Actually I already submitted the request.
Hi, I have a court date Oct. 21,08 for parking in the fire route of my friends building. How can i get this $100 fine reduced or eliminated? only argument i really have is that visitor parking was full and i went around a few times. I wasn't there for long either.
+
I just got a ticket for going right on red fail to stop(114[18])$180. No pedestrians were in the way. I'm not a unsafe driver, so I'm…
My mom received a ticket under OHTA 159(1). She was turning left at an intersection. The light was green and there were no cars in front of her. She entered the intersection and waited for incoming traffic to clear so that she could complete the turn. As she waited, a fire truck with its sirens on was driving from the street onto which she was turning (perpendicular). He honked at her (presumably…
Basically, I was selling the car and I informed the buyer that the car was in not insured at the time.
He bought dealer plates from his work place and assured me that it was fine. We got pulled over by OPP and they asked for our information.
I explained that it was my car and the test driver was working at a dealership with his plates that has insurance, they told us that the plates don't apply
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I was not going that fast, but there was a larger, and faster moving, vehicle behind me, gaining fast (I was driving a…
Location: 401 exit to Homer Watson Blvd, Kitchener/ Cambridge.
I was going on 401. When I was approaching the location mentioned at the topic, I tried to over take a truck in front of me, and realized a car tailgating me right after I went out to the fast lane. At first I thought it was some other fast drivers so I just thought that I would go back into the middle…
Hey, i recently got a ticket for failing to stop a red light (Section 114(18)).
I was travelling south, the cop was travelling north. He was on the other side of the intersection then me, my light turned yellow and i tried running it but it turned red before i could cross the line. I was going too fast to be able to stomp the break so i had to run it through.
I'm just curious how long will a Driving while suspended affect my insurance rates? Initially when I got my conviction with DWS my rates went from 180 a month to 390, since then I've had no tickets or even been pulled over and my rates have gone down to 240 since then. I believe it will be 3 years in Sept 2017. Will the DWS affect my insurance for 6 years because thats how long it stays on my…
It's winter, and there's been a cold snap. The highway you are traveling on is wet, but not slippery. You take your exit, but the salt trucks haven't been on this ramp, and despite slowing down to below the recommended speed, your car slips on some black ice, and you find the car rotating clockwise. The car rotates 180 degrees, and slides backwards off the ramp…
So about a month ago I received a stunt/racing charge for going 140 in an 80 zone. I decided to go with a paralegal, and was notified by the paralegal that on the summon's it states to go to a criminal court. The paralegal was confused as this should be at a Provincial court. They said that since I do not have any criminal charges, that the officer wrote the wrong address down including…
I got a careless driving ticket and I was involved in quite a serious accident. I was driving at about 60 km/h arriving towards a stop sign. Unfortunately when I tried to stop, my shoes were sliding off from my foot as they did not have any strap and were perhaps oversized and slippery. I could not stop at the sign and hit a van that had the right of way. Both vehicles were badly damaged and…
In some cases, it takes too long for the Crown to bring a charge against a defendant to trial. If your charge has taken too long to come to trial, you can stop the proceedings by "filing an 11B." This is filing paperwork to bring a motion at your trial, where you essentially say, "my rights to a speedy trial have been violated, and I want the case stopped." It is called an 11B because section…
Hi I'm new to this forum but I hope I'm bringing you all good news.
I recently wrote a book short titled ABUSE OF POWER
This book is all about how the Ontario government broke the law to enact the new street racing legislation.
To start with the denial of the right to remain innocent until proven guilty was enacted without due process under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How it wasn't done…
I have been caught 3 times driving while suspended for unpaid fines . I have still not paid the fines and did not go to the first 2 court dates. When I was pulled over the second time the police officer said he would put down as it was my first time . But I had to work as I just started a new job. I called in to have the date changed but they said it was to late . So I did not go to court .…
Today I received a hand held device ticket on Gardiner. I was pulled over by the police officer and told i was using my cell phone while driving but i never even touched my cell phone. He told me my hand was not on steering. I am sure i didn't touch the phone. The phone was on the right passenger seat connected to my car. I was using mobile gps which was on dashboard display and never touched…
As the title states, I received a ticket for failing to proceed at a green light. I have gained a lot of knowledge from this site for various things, however even a google search of this ticket doesn't seem to pull up much info. Someone else had made a post about this back in 2009 but my story is quite different.
So I shall explain...
On the night of February 23/2013 I had decided to be the…
Need some advice on reaching a plea deal with the prosecutor and how to go about talking to the crown. I'm not here to be lectured ect. I'm aware I made a mistake, and need advice on fixing it. So kindly keep comments about my impulsive decision to yourself.
Backstory:
I'm 19 with a g2 license. Was going home late at night and decided to go down a road that I knew was smooth with zero traffic so I…
I recently got pulled over and issued a ticket for following too closely and am looking to challenge the charges. However, I will be at school by the trial date. This is significant because I received the ticket in Ottawa (where my family lives), but attend school in Waterloo (almost 6 hours away). I will also be starting co-op this summer and as such likely won't be returning home in order to…
I was charged with careless driving for a one-vehicle accident, and would like to know how to go about pleading not guilty. I was driving on a rural road at night in an 80 kmh zone. I was driving up a hill. At the top of the hill is a 90 degree turn sign (no stop sign, no kmh posted). I hit the brakes too late, and because the road goes downhill and there's a lot of gravel, skidded one or two…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Tonight, I was pulled over for apparently doing 132km in an 80km zone. Although I'd only caught myself doing 120km(yes, still over, I'm aware). After about 30 min of sitting on the side of the road, the officer came over and kindly decided not to take away my license or impound the car on the spot. I did not recieve any fines. He did, however, give me a court date in August. Never mentioning…
I have been a frequent visitor of this site for a while now but I just made an account today to ask a question that I have gotten no real clear cut answer on in the past.
What I'm talking about here is H.I.D. (High Intensity Discharge) Headlight Conversion Kits. For those of you who don't know what they are all about you can just google it and you will receive more than enough…