Search found 566 matches

oh I get it, the regulation changed i.e. the law, not what they put on the instructions

ooh let me go re-read mine

The vehicle validation sheet you get from ServiceOntario with the two stickers remains the same. It'll still give you instructions to place the one sticker on the back of the permit, and then instructions for the plate sticker on ...

ooh let me go re-read mine

Nothing changed. It has simply been decided that failure to put the sticker on the registration does not put you in a law-breaking situation.
That's incorrect, the law actually changed a few years ago. You were actually required to affix the sticker to your permit until July of 2012.

The regulation for vehicle permits ...

exactly what Argyll says

If this is your first ticket then the insurance hit shouldn't be too extreme. Another one would be significant however.

Yes but the thing is I don't even drive much.
I'm 21 years old currently, turning 22 this year.

The whole reason my dad is paying for my insurance is because he wants it so by the time i turn 25, i ...

did this change,

I recently got my sticker, and on the instructions is clearly states where to put the stickers, on top/right number plate and on the back of the ownership

On a side note - was the sticker placed on both the back of the ownership as well as the TOP RIGHT corner of the license plate? Those are the two places they need to be. If ...

a 60 over reduced to 49 over?
so you where doing 160kmph? they didnt impound the car and arrest you?

I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ...

interesting,

again insurance will try anything to get out of a claim,
and thats also what I would have thought,

how would you "not" know that your license was suspended or expired, onus is on the driver surly, except for suspension, again how would you not know?

if you drive while disqualified, surly you are also driving with no insurance too ...

if you drive while disqualified, surly you are also driving with no insurance too

do you not have a certain amount of time to report an accident,
as long as no-one is injured,?
UK there is not sure about here

in other words you can drive off, as long as you do report it within 24 hours

txs

I had something similar, car hit me on inside, 401, no cops but other party 100% at fault, wrote my car off and I got paid

so really, if "everyone" who had a ticket , challenged it, the system would fall flat on its face

jsherk is right, they do not "have to" offer you any kind of deal, but they always do, the reason is, they do not want to deal with the possibility of you getting off on a technicality and they prefer a guaranteed win over a "most likely" win ...

jsherk wrote:I highly recommend everybody have a dashcam and record ALL interactions with police because most of the time the courts will always side with an officers testimony over an accused. If they are doing their job correctly, then they have nothing to worry about.

reminder to get a dashcam,
good advice

usually is I had a similar one, no u-turn,

post the ticket wipe out personal details

Danno5069 wrote:I recieved a ticket for turning left out of a Costco parking lot onto public road. Their is a sign on the Costco property prohibiting left turn or straight through. Is this ticket valid?

nice, good call

I would plead Not Guilty and request a Trial with the officer present, and then once you get the notice of trial, you can request disclosure (officers notes).

Note that the Toronto court system is pretty backed up so there is a good chance that the court date will be more than a year away and therefore you can get it stayed ...

its 3 years on the system and your insurance will want to know about it for 5, although after 3, it will be less of an issue, assuming your still clean

I see that Im pretty much screwed then. Its so ridiculous, something so small will affect your insurance by 15%. So if i pay for example this ticket right after my insurance renewal which is in ...

100% accurate, within tolerance.

To anyone familiar with the design and operation of electronic measuring equipment the situation involving radar gun testing in Ontario has always been a joke. Any device like this requires an external test against a standard to verify accuracy. A simple internal device test can verify the electronics are ...

the speedo is going to be accurate +/- 10, if its a digital readout, it's going to be balls on accurate

unless rims/tires are NOT OEM

in the past I've always spoken to police, like anyone treat people with some respect and it goes a loong way,
I've talked myself out of seat belts and even blowing a red light (and that was blatent) and the olf having fog lights on with no fog.

BUT that was back home and police are'nt as eager as writing tickets out as they are here, if your ...

hate to say it.. the old adage

"No good deed goes un-punished"

helpfulcitizen wrote: Lesson learned: Never stop to help someone on the side of the road. Thankfully no one was hurt, but I'm sure I'm still going to end up being sued or something.

speedo's have a +/- 10% accuracy

and modern speedo's are pretty damn accurate not like back in the day, a lot of it is digital technology, albeit on a analogue display.

I don't believe it's the website,

I forgotten the actual term/tech.

on some websites "depending" on your surfing habits AD's come up, personally, I've not had any on this website,
I would check out your iphone, to ensure it's not been hijacked



Can the mods or the website owners do something about the creepy ads on this website that try to ...

booster seats are supposed to be used for children from 18kgs onwards

1) if a child is not quite 18kg, say 16kg could/would the driver get a ticket, what would be the charge ?

2) if a car was stopped, is this something a LEO would check or know how to check

3) is this more of an issue if the car was in an accident and SIU was investigating as ...

agreed
also Jumping a RED light is far far far more deadly than most offences, as your likly to crash with somone coming the other way
I very rarely have any sympathy for anyone jumping a red light

Tks "jsherk" for sending the email. Soldiers died for a freedom and now we are letting unrepresentative government take away our freedoms with good ...

correct; but insurance "if they ask the question" usually, is what/how many convictions have you had in the past "5" years; albeit; if you've been with the insurance company some years and towards year 4 or 5 been good;
the hike should be less,

it WILL effect you for at least 5 years though insurance wise


I'll end with a bit of good news ...

wow minimum !

Stanton wrote: Driving with no insurance carries a minimum fine of $5,000 on your first offence.

points has nothing to do with insurance,
all they worry about if you have a conviction,
if you get convicted depending on if its a minor or major it could effect you insurance

"as" a rule of thumb 1 MINOR conviction usually has 0 effect on premiums,
i believe fail to stop is a minor

but the problem is the next one will then be your 2nd, so best ...

wow

on that post somone quoted

"Justice delayed is justice denied. Twenty year old tickets must have a statute of limitations under the law"


can the OP ignore this?
can he be extradited for want of another word, as it is in a different province, unless of course he has a good reason to go back to quebec


I wouldn't go down that road, these ...

can the OP ignore this?
can he be extradited for want of another word, as it is in a different province, unless of course he has a good reason to go back to quebec

hi mugwug,
txs, I did a bit of searching and yes your correct
did not realise about the rising premium, agreed value I think is only for classic cars
s the answer may be no
txs for the prompt reply

BAJ

It was my understanding that endorsement 43 was only available in the case of new cars when they are purchased, as stated under "conditions" of ...

1> Re-read how you have posted ; i.e. the "tone" ; the "yada,yada,yada" is used as a substitute where what you should be explaining is too lengthy or tedious to recite in full, this says a lot to me
if you think a serious charge and it's details are too "tedious" to write,

2> Doing twice the speed limit, on a public highway, was your life at risk ...

hey guy's anyone have any expereince/ideas on this

apparently
"Removing depreciation deduction (OPCF 43) – Removes your insurers right to deduct
depreciation from the value of your vehicle when covering damage or loss to your vehicle
from an insured peril."

So I'm trying to look into an agreed valuation on my car, its a 12' bm bought for around ...