Search found 709 matches

Thanks, I'll pass that on.

Also, it is illegal to do that, right? Someone else posted that it was only illegal to sell a vehicle with an altered odometer, so the ones offering the service were off the hook as long as they weren't car salesmen. But I found it to be an offense under the Weights and Measures Act - is that criminal?

HAHAHA

Duct tape, rope, hunting knife, bleach, garbage bags, condoms.

Bookm - did they do a lot of "coaching" on CWD? Are the contestants really as bad as they come across as, or are they coached into doing certain things?

Are the cops interested in the ones who perform this service? Reason I ask is because someone on another forum I post on snapped a picture of an advertisement for "odometer correction" in the GTA.

Definitely. I also like that the site isn't too busy; I lurked for a while on the Blueline forums, but just couldn't keep up with the mountain of posts every day. They also have LEO-only forums, so it's harder to really get to know them.

If I had known more cops like Bear and with his attitude, I probably would have joined the service right out of ...

I hate those cart blockers. I hug the right side of the aisle even when not stopping, so I can stop whenever I want without pulling the cart to the side. I have considered before that supermarket cart etiquette could very well be a reflection of a person's driving etiquette. The number of morons in a supermarket seem to match the number of morons ...

I couldn't help myself.

Way I read it 150(1)(b) also has to have met 150(1)(a) as well.
...


The way I read it, the 'or' at the end of (b) means that any of the conditions in either (a), (b), or (c) are valid for passing on the right, along with the condition in (1) that the movement can be made in safety (where the 'and' article applies).

...
The 141(6), seems to ...

I completely missed 151. But now that you brought my attention to it, check out subsection 7:

"A paved shoulder on any part of a highway that is designated under this section shall be deemed not to be part of the roadway within the meaning of the definition of "roadway" in subsection 1 (1) or part of the pavement for the purposes of clause 150 (1 ...

Which is why I'm confused that passing on the shoulder wouldn't be a charge under s. 150. Subsection 150(3) gives a few exemptions including driving on a paved shoulder, but the vehicle being passed has to be turning left (which is impossible from the right lane on a divided highway).

I await Bear's reply with bated breath...I always enjoy his ...

Or were there trucks in the right lane and the officer passed them on the shoulder? In the latter case, it would be "passing off roadway" (s. 150 (2)) but I'm pretty sure an officer can do so if on a call, lights or not.

For anyone, Sect 150 does not apply either on a "paved" shoulder! Fail to drive in a marked lane does...FYI

Really? But the ...

How can you tell when they are not on a call?

The part of s. 172 you referenced states, "...repeatedly changing lanes in close proximity to other vehicles so as to advance through the ordinary flow of traffic while driving at a rate of speed that is a marked departure from the lawful rate of speed."

So it would be an unsafe lane change anyways, but repeatedly doing so in order to speed will ...

Not that I know of. Which section would that be in violation of?

It might draw the attention of an officer who then tickets you for speeding.

Subsection (1) defines the term used in subsection (2). You can pretty much substitute the definition from subsection (1) into subsection (2):

"No person shall drive on a highway a motor vehicle that is equipped with or that carries or contains any device or equipment designed or intended for use in a motor vehicle to warn the driver of the ...

tdrive2 wrote:...
That officer knows your not supposed to pass on the right as the HTA says.
...

What? Section 150 specifically says you can.

Oddly enough, I don't think doing a deliberate burnout in a straight line falls under the definition of a stunt. This is what covers spinning tires:

2. Driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates an intention to cause some or all of its tires to lose traction with the surface of the highway while turning.

As long as the bolts illuminate only the plate and do not directly show white light to the rear, you should be fine (i.e., you can't see the actual LED from behind the bike).

Hahaha, Northern Ontarians. Here in Central Ontario we have the perfect mix of small-town values and insanity.

But if you do try to evade and he eventually finds you, you might get some attitude and a bigger ticket.

Don't we have something against laying two charges for the same offense? Or is that just in the States?

Yes that would be a charge, and yes lidar will work without front plates. Think of all the states and provinces with no front plate requirements.

That's not a fatal error. You can get a list of them from TicketCombat's website:

http://www.ticketcombat.com/offences/fatal.php

Did your celebrity status factor into the ticket?

Red? I thought you were driving a Lincoln now.

12-step program for speeding?

...


8. Driving a motor vehicle without due care and attention, without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway or in a manner that may endanger any person by,

i. driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates an intention to prevent another vehicle from passing,

IMHO
i) refers to a 2 lane hwy, someone attempting to ...

How well could a ticket like that hold up in court? Not exactly the kind of behaviour 172 is geared towards, but you could make the wording match.

For example, i. and ii. sound to me like it is addressing those who cut in front of a vehicle, brake check them (ii.), and then prevent the other car from passing them in another lane by switching lanes ...

Hey I'm not obese, don't tax my delicious burgers!

How's this for speeding?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssqs4S4bRGM[/youtube]

Make that course the only requirement for a license in Ontario. Those that are not worthy will crash and burn. No second chances.

tdrive2 wrote:toe your car

Is that what happens when you drive with your toes?