Search found 1367 matches

hwybear wrote:In 12 years I have never heard of anyone getting in crap-ola for not writing tickets nor have I seen anyone winning a toaster for having the most tickets either!

What about a shiny new pair of handcuffs??

I'd wait for another week and file the ticket with option 3. Then wait for the response.... then go from there. Like 'Bear said sometime you win, sometimes you still have to goto court.

The law "prescribes" so much I think a doctor wrote it.


'Bear, if I have an Ipod and my car has a AUX line-in but I have to press the thumb wheel on the Ipod to change songs, does this count as a "hand-held entertainment" device?

"Every driver of a motor vehicle or street motor vehicle shall carry his or her licence with him or her at all times while he or she is in charge of a motor vehicle or street car and shall surrender the licence for reasonable inspection upon the demand of a police officer or officer appointed for carrying out the provisions of this Act."


Every ...

Truthfully I'd expect speeds on the Trans-Canada to go to maybe around the 130 mark with no official speed limit. Approaching cities, put in progressively lowering speed limits and make sure people slow down with enforcement.

It makes sense, the Gov't won't go for it. But, I agree with you.

1-888-XCOPPER

Bear has already stated that he'll give 20 over before he pulls in a customer...so don't we already have 120, at least in his area???

If I understand you correctly, the officer in the plane maintains visual contact with my car and voice contact with the ground officer from the time of the violation until the stop is made?

If so, then I would have been clocked somewhere close to the place that they stopped me. That raises an interesting question -- since I believe that the hash ...

Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh happy day.

Officers can pull you over just to check and see if you have all the required documentation, I don't know why they don't just say that. Back in my youthful days I had an officer pull me over in a "Mobile RIDE" check..... whatever.....blah, blah. He was OK just saying hello, nudge, nudge.

Even if notes are not clear, Bookm said it best: If an officer plans to use his notes, defence has the right to see what information is in the notes.

I completely understand that. But the notes are to refresh my memory, so I could have more than what's in my notes stored in my "pea" brain. :wink:

But, if the question is who remembers best ...

However, nobody is going to stop him from doing this again, law or no law.

Could always get jail time for driving under suspension. Last person I saw got 45days, served on weekends.

And throughout the week he was......doing........?

Tell you what how's about putting biometric scanners in cars, fingerprints work just fine. We got them on all ...

Sorry for my noobness, what does the acronyms PON and JP stand for?

Also, when the officer pulled me over he said it was because when he punched in my license plate it matched a suspected driver who's license has been expired. Is this legit???? I thought if they punched in my license plate on their terminal it would tell them that information ...

Only way I will vote for him is IF photo radar is back.

Will drivers abide by 110km? or do the usual I can get away with 20over and now drive 130? or will they remain at 119ish?

I know the local council here raised some rural roads from 80km - 90km this spring. However the local police have taken a zero tolerance policy in these areas. I travel ...

I thought the fine for 50 over was already a max of 2000.

Minimum!! Max of $10K and this guy deserves it. The law was created for dumb-dumb's like this and here it does apply. However, nobody is going to stop him from doing this again, law or no law.

Radar Identified wrote:Were his passengers wearing T-shirts that said "I'M WITH STUPID"?

They said "Officer, can you call me a cab?"

1-888-xcopper

Just to be clear, the officer said he would present the disclosure "just before trial", not in advance. I read a response by Radar ID (elsewhere on this forum, in a similar scenario) that perhaps he should refuse to accept the last minute disclosure package and apply to the court for a stay instead.

'Bear wrote that the request for disclosure ...

Curious from someone else point...what is the big deal BS about police notes and whether they are legible to someone else or not?

Notes are not the end all be all, notes are made to merely refresh my own personal memory of the incident and nothing more.

OR if my notes are legible but all in code that I know...again is to refresh my memory not ...

No harm in asking for a stay but I think the continuance will be awarded. If the continuance stretches out to the magic 9 month plus mark, then file form 4F could be filed out and the stay awarded anyway. If I were the JP I would dismiss the charges based on these tactics. It's not like Joe Public gets a ticket everyday, but the courts deal with ...

Radar Identified wrote:Let's see how many guesses it gets...

8.....lol......

Now if I don't decide to go to the option 4 "prosecutor" do all 3 officers have to show up or do they not have to show up as there is no check box under the witness box.

There will only be 2 officers at most. The one running the gun and the one that pulled you over. Both have to show up to prove your guilt. Go chat and see whats on the table. If ...

There is also that group of drivers who think the left lane is the 'passing lane', the centre lane is the 'travel lane', and the right lane is the 'merge lane'. :shock:

Why? Why?! :cry:

Because they are driving in accordance with "generally accepted" driving rules, not the real rules. The three lane approach actually works, if all drivers ...

That there "racer" has an edumacation.......yup, gone done and graduated right outta grade skool....he sure is smart, S, M, R, T.......smart.

Here, here Racer.


And if someone breaks into my house they better be a whole lot bigger then me. And the cops are going to need the rubber gloves too.

Pick the place

liveontheedge wrote:Does anyone know where i can locate the following readings to use as references for my 11(b) application?

R. v. Mastroianni, [2000] O.J. No. 3227 at pg. , (Ont. Ct. Jus. In Appeal),
R. v. Formosa, [1998] O.J. No. 4674 (Ont. Ct. Jus.).

Thanks

http://www.canlii.org

I'll pull out my tennis ball (can't afford the crystal ball) and gaze into the fuzzy side ...

The ball is predicting that the future holds a change to part of the act.

The vehicle impoundment part will be removed, but the 7 day suspension will stand.


I'm trying to understand how this all works. Is there any correlation between the potential ...

Yes you can represent someone or attend on their behalf (sorry R & RI). The only issue is whether you will go "on record" as representing them. What that means is you state your name and say that you are representing your friend. If you don't want to go on record, it becomes a little tricky.

I cover this in detail in Step 2 of my site ("Change ...