What's with the grey parts of the HTA?

Moderators: Reflections, admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Decatur, bend

xjonathan
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined:

What's with the grey parts of the HTA?

Unread post by xjonathan on

So, looking through the HTA, there's a lot of grey parts there. Are these applicable? Some date back to 1994. Example:
On a day to be named by proclamation of the Lieutenant Governor, subsection (1) is amended by the Statutes of Ontario, 1994, chapter 27, subsection 138 (1) by adding the following definition:
I read that to say this isn't in effect yet...is that correct?

EDIT: Assuming the above is correct, and they eventually get proclaimed, are they then retroactive to any past occurrences that may be before the court?


User avatar
Reflections
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1490
Joined:
Location: somewhere in traffic

Moderator

Unread post by Reflections on

The date to be proclaimed......legal jargon for: date to be instated. The hands free bill was worded the same.


As for your edit, you cannot create a law to try someone. If you manage to do something that is not defined the gov't can't create a law to smack you with. If they create it then you break it, then to court you can go...
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com


xjonathan
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined:

Unread post by xjonathan on

Thanks...so I take it to mean, anything in grey isn't yet law?

(when I say grey, I'm referring to the greyed-out portions of the online version of the HTA here


User avatar
Reflections
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1490
Joined:
Location: somewhere in traffic

Moderator

Unread post by Reflections on

Those would be changes made as of that copy. Unchanged is left as normal text, no background shading.




http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com


Post Reply

Return to “General Talk”