So in 2010 Decatur released new Canadian versions of their radar manuals that removed the requirement to test with tuning forks and the requirement for officer to do tracking history. Does anybody have any information on how this came about? I have a suspicion that it was probably a "change your manual or we won't buy your units anymore" type of deal, as the USA manuals have never had the same changes made to them. Could the OPP have been involved as they would probably be the largest users in Ontario? Or maybe it RCMP or some other Canadian police force that was involved in getting the change made? Anyways I may make some freedom of information requests to see if it's possible to track down the source of the change. Thanks
Topic
Radar Manual- No tuning forks and No tracking history
Hmmm. The radar instructor was pretty explicit in his explanation to me. I thought I understood him but maybe not so can you elaborate? 1. How radar units establish patrol speed? 2. What does VIP do, how it does it work and why is it used? 3. What is shadowing? 4. Does shadowing occur with VIP equipped units? If not, why not?
screeech wrote:
And for the record...the patrol speed on the radar IS established by the radar unit itslef, not by the cars speedometer or the V.I.P. (portal, not protocol)
Hmmm. The radar instructor was pretty explicit in his explanation to me. I thought I understood him but maybe not so can you elaborate?
1. How radar units establish patrol speed?
2. What does VIP do, how it does it work and why is it used?
3. What is shadowing?
4. Does shadowing occur with VIP equipped units? If not, why not?
Last edited by rank on Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:37 am, edited 3 times in total.
Wow, this is important... I had always assumed that the patrol speed displayed on the radar unit was calculated using the radar itslef. Units without VIP establish patrol speed with the radar. They use large stationary objects (like bridges, tractor trailers) and a point of reference to establish a speed of zero....whoops that's right sometimes they can use a moving tractor trailer to establish "zero" which throws the radar off. This is called shadowing and the big advantage to VIP. Yep. That's the way it was explained to me. I agree. I think I mentioned before that I operate a small fleet of highway tractors. I have the software to program the ECM's The speedometer only knows what data is typed into the software. I can change the "patrol speed" by simply changing the tire size or rear gear ratio in the software. Therefore I contend that it's possible the patrol car has different sized snow tires installed and it may be throwing the patrol speed off and nobody would know/care because it says right in the test procedure that "the radar is assumed to be correct". Details like this is why the people need to see the COMPLETE manual. And by the way, IMO, withholding this information from the defendant, the taxpayer, the people that bought and paid for the manual is not justice and should be heard by the supreme court if someone wanted to take it that far. You have the right to cross examine your accuser and in the case of Radar/Lidar the machine is your accuser. The officer does nothing but write down what the machine says.
jsherk wrote:
rank wrote:
The radar instructor explained to me that this is because the radar uses Vehicle Interface protocol". He went on to say that VIP means the radar is tied to the cars ECM therefore it doesn't matter what the speedo says.
Wow, this is important... I had always assumed that the patrol speed displayed on the radar unit was calculated using the radar itslef.
Units without VIP establish patrol speed with the radar. They use large stationary objects (like bridges, tractor trailers) and a point of reference to establish a speed of zero....whoops that's right sometimes they can use a moving tractor trailer to establish "zero" which throws the radar off. This is called shadowing and the big advantage to VIP.
jsherk wrote:
rank wrote:
If the patrol speed on the radar unit is tied to the ECM then of course it will always be almost exactly the same as the speedometer... they are both getting the same number from the cars computer!
Yep. That's the way it was explained to me.
jsherk wrote:
rank wrote:
This to me is even more of an issue because you still have no way of knowing if the ECM computer reading is accurate or not. So it goes back again to getting calibration/accuracy records of the speedometer (or ECM computer as the case may be).
Again you can not say the radar is accurate because it matches the speedometer/ECM and the speedometer/ECM is accurate because it matched the radar... you need an independent test of one of them to prove it is accurate before you can claim the other is also accurate.
I agree. I think I mentioned before that I operate a small fleet of highway tractors. I have the software to program the ECM's The speedometer only knows what data is typed into the software. I can change the "patrol speed" by simply changing the tire size or rear gear ratio in the software. Therefore I contend that it's possible the patrol car has different sized snow tires installed and it may be throwing the patrol speed off and nobody would know/care because it says right in the test procedure that "the radar is assumed to be correct". Details like this is why the people need to see the COMPLETE manual.
And by the way, IMO, withholding this information from the defendant, the taxpayer, the people that bought and paid for the manual is not justice and should be heard by the supreme court if someone wanted to take it that far. You have the right to cross examine your accuser and in the case of Radar/Lidar the machine is your accuser. The officer does nothing but write down what the machine says.
The moving radar establishes its patrol speed using the front or rear antenna. It does not obtain the patrol speed from the VIP. I'm not currently in reach of my VIP manual to quote from it though.
The moving radar establishes its patrol speed using the front or rear antenna. It does not obtain the patrol speed from the VIP.
I'm not currently in reach of my VIP manual to quote from it though.
Decatur, you are correct: the patrol speed is established by the radar beam leaving the antenna and striking off stationary objects such as the ground in front of the cruiser...with shadowing, the patrol speed on the cruiser is established off the back of a moving truck, going in the same direction. The cruiser must be going faster than the truck to its front...with the v.i.p., shadowing will not occur, it was a fact of life before the v.i.p. thing came along...but even with shadowing, a properly trained radar operator would recognize the fact and disregard any readings during a shadowing event...there is lots more to be said on it, but that is basically it...
Decatur, you are correct: the patrol speed is established by the radar beam leaving the antenna and striking off stationary objects such as the ground in front of the cruiser...with shadowing, the patrol speed on the cruiser is established off the back of a moving truck, going in the same direction. The cruiser must be going faster than the truck to its front...with the v.i.p., shadowing will not occur, it was a fact of life before the v.i.p. thing came along...but even with shadowing, a properly trained radar operator would recognize the fact and disregard any readings during a shadowing event...there is lots more to be said on it, but that is basically it...
Exactly. And how does the VIP eliminate shadowing? The OPP instructor and I discussed this at length and I thought I understood it. I suppose I'll have to get another speeding ticket so I can sit with him again and review the manual. Maybe he'll just get tired of me and make me a copy LOL.
jsherk wrote:
What does the v.i.p. plugin do?
Exactly. And how does the VIP eliminate shadowing?
The OPP instructor and I discussed this at length and I thought I understood it. I suppose I'll have to get another speeding ticket so I can sit with him again and review the manual. Maybe he'll just get tired of me and make me a copy LOL.
I would think that the people that allegedly use this device would know what it plugs into. Voila. The big mystery is solved. "The VIP™ is a compact module that plugs into the diagnostic port of the vehicle improving the performance of the Genesis II Select™ radar. The VIP™ reads the speed information sent by the diagnostic port and uses that information to help eliminate shadowing......" "Decatur VIP Speedometer Interface Kit will assist the radar in providing an independent estimate of ground speed, which will essentially cure shadowing and batching..........Decatur Speedometer Interface Kit VIP works in all cars made after 1996........Vehicle-independent through the diagnostic port inside the car......Genesis radar accepts patrol speed information through communication port"
I would think that the people that allegedly use this device would know what it plugs into. Voila. The big mystery is solved.
"The VIP™ is a compact module that plugs into the diagnostic port of the vehicle improving the performance of the Genesis II Select™ radar. The VIP™ reads the speed information sent by the diagnostic port and uses that information to help eliminate shadowing......"
"Decatur VIP Speedometer Interface Kit will assist the radar in providing an independent estimate of ground speed, which will essentially cure shadowing and batching..........Decatur Speedometer Interface Kit VIP works in all cars made after 1996........Vehicle-independent through the diagnostic port inside the car......Genesis radar accepts patrol speed information through communication port"
I checked prior posts and I don't think anyone actually asked what it plugs into. And to clarify one of the highlighted areas, the Genesis radar does accept patrol speed through the VIP but it doesn't establish the patrol speed through it. It's merely a check and balance for the patrol speed. Eg. Radar without the VIP may have trouble keeping up with an accurate PS if the vehicle is accelerating heavily. The VIP ensures this won't happen. It is still the officers responsibility to make sure the PS and speedometer are within the proper range prior to accepting a target speed. Post edited ....
I checked prior posts and I don't think anyone actually asked what it plugs into.
And to clarify one of the highlighted areas, the Genesis radar does accept patrol speed through the VIP but it doesn't establish the patrol speed through it. It's merely a check and balance for the patrol speed. Eg. Radar without the VIP may have trouble keeping up with an accurate PS if the vehicle is accelerating heavily. The VIP ensures this won't happen. It is still the officers responsibility to make sure the PS and speedometer are within the proper range prior to accepting a target speed.
If the radar antenna still determines PS then how is shadowing eliminated by plugging in VIP?
Decatur wrote:
And to clarify one of the highlighted areas, the Genesis radar does accept vehicle speed through the VIP but it doesn't establish the patrol speed through it.
If the radar antenna still determines PS then how is shadowing eliminated by plugging in VIP?
Where do you see that inference? I don't see any mention of the radar antenna being used to determine patrol speed in a VIP equipped radar unit. To quote hwybear, "VIP (vehicle interface portal) is a feature that constantly correlates the patrol speed on the radar to the speedometer, which always ensures the patrol speed is accurate. This prevents batching and harmonic errors, plus also allows the radar to be operated in adverse weather conditions as the patrol speed can still be obtained"
jsherk wrote:
Good find
This does infer that the patrol speed displayed on the radar device is still determined by radar though.
Where do you see that inference?
I don't see any mention of the radar antenna being used to determine patrol speed in a VIP equipped radar unit.
To quote hwybear, "VIP (vehicle interface portal) is a feature that constantly correlates the patrol speed on the radar to the speedometer, which always ensures the patrol speed is accurate. This prevents batching and harmonic errors, plus also allows the radar to be operated in adverse weather conditions as the patrol speed can still be obtained"
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: My head hurts. Obviously, when you say vehicle speed you mean speed of the patrol car (not target speed). What then is the difference between the speed of the patrol car and "patrol speed". One would think they are synonomous. Are they not?
Decatur wrote:
It does not obtain the patrol speed from the VIP.
Decatur wrote:
...the Genesis radar does accept vehicle speed through the VIP.....
Decatur wrote:
but it doesn't establish the patrol speed through it.
My head hurts.
Obviously, when you say vehicle speed you mean speed of the patrol car (not target speed). What then is the difference between the speed of the patrol car and "patrol speed". One would think they are synonomous. Are they not?
I don't have much experience with a VIP cable I'm guessing this is specific to Genisis II Select . However Stalker uses a VSS cable which I am assuming is the same as a VIP which does the following : (directly from Stalker) Moving traffic radar systems measure the patrol car's speed by tracking the radar return off the road surface in front of the patrol car (ground speed). Occasionally a radar can be "mislead" when the patrol car is following another vehicle that is moving at a speed that is substantially different from the patrol car's speed. When this happens, the radar will see the speed differential between the vehicles and pick that as the patrol car's speed. This is called "Shadowing." The radar may get signals from many sources while a patrol car is moving; ground speed, closure speeds from oncoming vehicles, and relative speed differentials of multiple vehicles ahead of the patrol car. Sometimes the radar just needs a little help in picking which speed is the actual ground speed. With conventional radars it is up to the operator to make sure that the radar has made the correct decision on which signal is the ground speed. The Stalker DSR solves the problem by using the VSS signal to tell the radar which radar signal is the ground speed. All modern vehicles have a VSS sensor (Vehicle Speed Sensor) attached to the transmission or an axle that generates a speed signal. This signal is used by the speedometer, cruise control, and some of the engine and transmission computers. By tapping into this electronic signal the Stalker DSR can monitor the patrol vehicle's speed as measured by the car's VSS sensor. Once the VSS cable is wired and attached to the Stalker DSR, and the radar is operated in the moving mode, the DSR performs an "Auto-Calibration" sequence. This sequence matches the VSS signal to the radar ground speed. This patent pending automatic synchronization routine overcomes concerns that tire wear could impact accuracy and allows the radar to be effortlessly switched betweens vehicles.
I don't have much experience with a VIP cable I'm guessing this is specific to Genisis II Select . However Stalker uses a VSS cable which I am assuming is the same as a VIP which does the following : (directly from Stalker)
Moving traffic radar systems measure the patrol car's speed by tracking the radar return off the road surface in front of the patrol car (ground speed). Occasionally a radar can be "mislead" when the patrol car is following another vehicle that is moving at a speed that is substantially different from the patrol car's speed. When this happens, the radar will see the speed differential between the vehicles and pick that as the patrol car's speed. This is called "Shadowing."
The radar may get signals from many sources while a patrol car is moving; ground speed, closure speeds from oncoming vehicles, and relative speed differentials of multiple vehicles ahead of the patrol car. Sometimes the radar just needs a little help in picking which speed is the actual ground speed. With conventional radars it is up to the operator to make sure that the radar has made the correct decision on which signal is the ground speed. The Stalker DSR solves the problem by using the VSS signal to tell the radar which radar signal is the ground speed.
All modern vehicles have a VSS sensor (Vehicle Speed Sensor) attached to the transmission or an axle that generates a speed signal. This signal is used by the speedometer, cruise control, and some of the engine and transmission computers. By tapping into this electronic signal the Stalker DSR can monitor the patrol vehicle's speed as measured by the car's VSS sensor.
Once the VSS cable is wired and attached to the Stalker DSR, and the radar is operated in the moving mode, the DSR performs an "Auto-Calibration" sequence. This sequence matches the VSS signal to the radar ground speed. This patent pending automatic synchronization routine overcomes concerns that tire wear could impact accuracy and allows the radar to be effortlessly switched betweens vehicles.
Perhaps people who allegedly know about these things don't want to give too many details as having too much education out there may affect their livelihood...the vip is used to help reduce lag time between the car and the radar which eliminates batching...now you will ask, what's batching? the vip also eliminates the shadowing effect as explained earlier...
Perhaps people who allegedly know about these things don't want to give too many details as having too much education out there may affect their livelihood...the vip is used to help reduce lag time between the car and the radar which eliminates batching...now you will ask, what's batching? the vip also eliminates the shadowing effect as explained earlier...
When I read that quote about VIP, I just understand it to mean that the unit is using the signal from patrol vehicle computer (via vip/vss cable) to compare against the patrol vehicle speed that is being generated by the radar. The radar is receiving multiple signals back and has to determine which one is patrol vehicle speed and which one is target vehicle speed and which ones are neither. When it is not sure about which radar signal is patrol vehicle speed (due to shadowing), it compares it to the patrol vehicle speed from computer and then says "this one matches so it must be the correct patrol vehicle speed" which eliminates the shadowing error. And after reading argyll, decatur and nanuk comments, I believe that is what they are saying as well. Of course it could also mean that it actually uses ONLY the patrol vehicle speed from computer when it gets confused and detects the shadowing error. However without putting an engineer from the manufacture on the stand, I don't think we would ever know for sure. But regardless of how/when it uses the computer speed, there still needs to be a visual check of the speedometer with the patrol vehicle speed displayed on radar during the test, which in my opinion still makes it necessary to prove the accuracy of the speedometer with some external testing or the accuracy of the radar with external tuning forks. Just because they both match/agree does not of itself make them both accurate. It just means that they could be equally inaccurate.
rank wrote:
Where do you see that inference?
When I read that quote about VIP, I just understand it to mean that the unit is using the signal from patrol vehicle computer (via vip/vss cable) to compare against the patrol vehicle speed that is being generated by the radar. The radar is receiving multiple signals back and has to determine which one is patrol vehicle speed and which one is target vehicle speed and which ones are neither. When it is not sure about which radar signal is patrol vehicle speed (due to shadowing), it compares it to the patrol vehicle speed from computer and then says "this one matches so it must be the correct patrol vehicle speed" which eliminates the shadowing error.
And after reading argyll, decatur and nanuk comments, I believe that is what they are saying as well.
Of course it could also mean that it actually uses ONLY the patrol vehicle speed from computer when it gets confused and detects the shadowing error. However without putting an engineer from the manufacture on the stand, I don't think we would ever know for sure.
But regardless of how/when it uses the computer speed, there still needs to be a visual check of the speedometer with the patrol vehicle speed displayed on radar during the test, which in my opinion still makes it necessary to prove the accuracy of the speedometer with some external testing or the accuracy of the radar with external tuning forks. Just because they both match/agree does not of itself make them both accurate. It just means that they could be equally inaccurate.
We agree on that. In my original statement a several posts ago, I said that the radar is tied to the ECM...which is true. I suppose it could be said that the data from the ECM is for lack of a more complicated term, is the tie breaker. It has the final say. We agree on that also. I will now take this opportunity to correct my earlier statement that "it doesn't matter what the speedometer says". This is of course incorrect and the radar instructor never told me this exactly. I should not have worded it in that way. He said something like "With VIP the speed comes from the ECM so tires can't throw the speedometer off". It clearly states in the Genesis operator manual that I read, before the officer locks a speeder, the officer must compare that the speedo reading and the radar patrol speed are the same. If they aren't then no enforcement action will be taken. My apologies to the forum for that misinformation. Again we agree. For example, if tires are changed to a different size without changing the tires size information in the ECM, then the ECM/VSS/speedometer will not match the patrol speed obtained by the antenna.
jsherk wrote:
When I read that quote about VIP, I just understand it to mean that the unit is using the signal from patrol vehicle computer (via vip/vss cable) to compare against the patrol vehicle speed that is being generated by the radar. The radar is receiving multiple signals back and has to determine which one is patrol vehicle speed and which one is target vehicle speed and which ones are neither. When it is not sure about which radar signal is patrol vehicle speed (due to shadowing), it compares it to the patrol vehicle speed from computer and then says "this one matches so it must be the correct patrol vehicle speed" which eliminates the shadowing error.
And after reading argyll, decatur and nanuk comments, I believe that is what they are saying as well.
We agree on that. In my original statement a several posts ago, I said that the radar is tied to the ECM...which is true. I suppose it could be said that the data from the ECM is for lack of a more complicated term, is the tie breaker. It has the final say.
jsherk wrote:
But regardless of how/when it uses the computer speed, there still needs to be a visual check of the speedometer with the patrol vehicle speed displayed on radar during the test....
We agree on that also. I will now take this opportunity to correct my earlier statement that "it doesn't matter what the speedometer says". This is of course incorrect and the radar instructor never told me this exactly. I should not have worded it in that way. He said something like "With VIP the speed comes from the ECM so tires can't throw the speedometer off". It clearly states in the Genesis operator manual that I read, before the officer locks a speeder, the officer must compare that the speedo reading and the radar patrol speed are the same. If they aren't then no enforcement action will be taken. My apologies to the forum for that misinformation.
jsherk wrote:
which in my opinion still makes it necessary to prove the accuracy of the speedometer with some external testing or the accuracy of the radar with external tuning forks. Just because they both match/agree does not of itself make them both accurate. It just means that they could be equally inaccurate.
Again we agree. For example, if tires are changed to a different size without changing the tires size information in the ECM, then the ECM/VSS/speedometer will not match the patrol speed obtained by the antenna.
I suspect you're correct. Which is shameful and begs the question, why are these people in this forum then? To spread half truths? It is a truly sad when some civil servants paid with tax payer dollars to serve and protect are more concerned with their own livelihood and power than they are about truth.
screeech wrote:
Perhaps people who allegedly know about these things don't want to give too many details as having too much education out there may affect their livelihood...
I suspect you're correct. Which is shameful and begs the question, why are these people in this forum then? To spread half truths? It is a truly sad when some civil servants paid with tax payer dollars to serve and protect are more concerned with their own livelihood and power than they are about truth.
Do you know what section of the manual it says this in?
rank wrote:
It clearly states in the Genesis operator manual that I read, before the officer locks a speeder, the officer must compare that the speedo reading and the radar patrol speed are the same.
Do you know what section of the manual it says this in?
Do you know what section of the manual it says this in? Nope. I wasn't allowed to take pictures or make copies. I just took notes and asked questions
jsherk wrote:
rank wrote:
It clearly states in the Genesis operator manual that I read, before the officer locks a speeder, the officer must compare that the speedo reading and the radar patrol speed are the same.
Do you know what section of the manual it says this in?
Nope. I wasn't allowed to take pictures or make copies. I just took notes and asked questions
I can not find that anywhere in the Rev 25/Aug/2010 Canada Variant of Genesis II Select Directional manual, except in the testing procedure for before test and after test.
I can not find that anywhere in the Rev 25/Aug/2010 Canada Variant of Genesis II Select Directional manual, except in the testing procedure for before test and after test.
Post deleted. On second thought, I'll send you an e-mail instead. The walls have ears. Next thing you know, the OPP will have Decatur revise the manual again.
Post deleted. On second thought, I'll send you an e-mail instead. The walls have ears. Next thing you know, the OPP will have Decatur revise the manual again.
"why are these people in this forum then? To spread half truths? It is a truly sad when some civil servants paid with tax payer dollars to serve and protect are more concerned with their own livelihood and power than they are about truth." Where are the half truths? Who said they were Civil Servants paid by tax payer dollars?
"why are these people in this forum then? To spread half truths? It is a truly sad when some civil servants paid with tax payer dollars to serve and protect are more concerned with their own livelihood and power than they are about truth." Where are the half truths? Who said they were Civil Servants paid by tax payer dollars?
The fine is not the issue but I am worried about insurance rates. First speeding ticket in my life Any suggestions on how to handle this? I can't afford to spend a day at the court
So was at court today in Orillia for a friend, and I had submitted a couple notice of motion a couple weeks ago that I wanted to deal with before arraignment. I met with prosecutor before hand, and it went something like this:
Prosecutor: "Do you have the case law?"
Me: "What do you mean?"
Prosecutor: "Do you have the case law for your motion?"
Me: "All the case law is quoted in the motion that I…
1)failure to change address on license (i got married a couple of months earlier and moved)
2) license plate not fully visible
I got pulled over because I had 2 letters peeling off my license plate. I know ignorance isn't a defense, but I really had no idea that this was an issue. Plus, you see many cars on the road with peeling plates. I got both tickets and…
I was driving around 140km/h on a 100km/h posted on the highway. I was in the fast lane. The officer was very nice and reduced it to no points and just 15km/h over.
I only have my G2.
1. Will this affect me taking the G test next month?
2. I am very grateful for the officer lowering the ticket... should I just pay the 52.5$ and leave it as is.. I am a secondary driver under my dads name and we have…
Hi, thanks in advance for the help. Been driving for 10 years, clean record until today when I got slapped with two tickets. First: going 135 at 100 on the 401, second: not having a valid sticker (I recently moved and completely forgot about it)
My friend tells me I should fight the speed ticket, if anything to reduce the fine and points. Would be alot of help if anyone could walk me through…
My wife, who has never had a traffic ticket in her life, just got 11 points.
Two tickets: "following too closely" and "failure to stop"
She was on a residential street and was behind a car at a crosswalk waiting for a pedestrian. Pedestrian crossed, they continued. Cop was drivig towards them down a side street , and as they passed he went after my wife.
I was driving in mid lane and was following a line of cars around speed limit.
The vehicle in front of me was large and I decided to change to the left lane to get better line sight.
As soon as I entered the left lane, I saw the car in front of me approximately 200m away stopped dead (for some odd reason, there was more traffic on the left lane).
Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive.
I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking…
I was driving on a teusday night in the rain and fog at whites and highview by St. Mary CSS in Pickering, ON. At the time I was waiting at a red light to make a left north onto whites. There was also a car on the opposite side of the intersection making a left. The cars beams were pointed almost directly at my face and as a result, with the combination of the rain and fog, I…
I am new to this website and this is my first post so please forgive me if I've put this question in the wrong place. Please bear with me until I learn the ropes a bit.
So here are my questions:
Antique cars and hot rods (1930's- early '60's) and seat belt use in Ontario. If these vehicles never came from the respective factories with any seat belts, do they have to be retrofitted ?
OK so Jshreck has been taking some heat for the concept of providing the DL as being not required and therefore inadmissable in court. Personally, I think that argument would fall on deaf ears in the lower court and any chance at victory would have to be in the highest court. That would be quite something. When pigs fly I think, but along that line of thought, allow me to continue.......
I have a court date soon and am wondering whether the officers just read off their disclosure notes when interrogated.
Basically, according to the disclosure notes and the said distances and speeds quoted, by doing some simple math it just doesn't add up. My concern is whether the officer can change his story when on the stand after maybe realizing this?
Last week I was driving home from college in the sauga area. I drive a 1995 Chevy Monte Carlo v6 which I've owned since 2000, I really haven't done anything to the car except tinted windows (not completely darken) and some rims, and Nothing Engine wise. Anyway I look in my rear view mirror and out of no where i see cherry flashing. When pulled over the officer asked do you…
I was charged 2 days ago with RED LIGHT - FAIL TO STOP and set fined $150 and I guess 3 points. I was driving turning left on the intersection with a traffic light, and when I jst about to turn left the light turned to orange and I didn't have enough time to stop. Once I turned I saw the light turned to red and 2seconds later I saw a police beacon flashing through my rear-view mirror. It…
I figured pleading not guilty is the same as saying it was signed which is stupid. A friend of mine told me I could plead guilty with explanation and try to get the fine reduced when I come in.
So this Friday I was stopped by a local officer for going 110 in a 80zone. He also claims I was going 105 in a 50zone,which we literally passed when he stopped me as I was braking. It has been 3 days already and I can't seem to locate my ticket on their Internet site "pay ticket". Is there a way to determine if he has filed for certificate of offence to the courts? It has been 3 days I presume…
My trial date is in a couple days for a speeding ticket (york region) and i am nervous it is my first ticket ever as well as first trial
I did notice my ticket was filed beyond 7 days, 10 days after the day i got the ticket to be exact, which is stamped on the ticket. is this enough to have it dismissed?
If you look close enough, beside the drivers' side "A" pillar you will see a white circle = front antenna of Genesis radar......plus look above the dash pad...there is the Spectre RDD.
Any suggestions on how to handle this? I can't afford to spend a day at the court 
