Part I or III offence?

Moderators: Reflections, admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Decatur, bend

lorac
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined:

Part I or III offence?

Unread post by lorac on

I'm confused by the HTA Part I and III offences. Is a ticket for driving 65 km in a 50 km posted zone (i.e. 15 kms over limit) a Part I or Part III offence? Am confused whether a Part III offence is based on going over 49km per hour or if it's based on going over 49km past the posted limit. Thank you!


Stanton
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2111
Joined:
Location: Ontario

Unread post by Stanton on

It’s up to the charging officer. They can proceed by way of Part III summons for any offence but for most minor offences a Part I (a regular ticket) is more common. Typically for 15 over it would be a Part I. A Part III wouldn't be issued unless too much time had passed for a regular ticket or there were other more serious charges laid as well.


lorac
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined:

Unread post by lorac on

Thanks. Do you know why a ticket for driving 65km in a 50km posted zone would have the summons section completed by the police officer? If it's a Part 1 offence, why would I be summoned to appear in court instead of just having the option to pay the fine? Again.. confused. Many thanks for your help.


User avatar
Decatur
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 697
Joined:

Posting Awards

Moderator

Unread post by Decatur on

A Summons can be issued under Part I or Part III and are generally used when there is no set fine available to the officer or if a higher fine is being asked for. I've seen them used if a person has multiple convictions for a similar offence.






Post Reply

Return to “General Talk”