Charge: 141km/h on 401... 41 over. Details: Been 45 days since ticket and I live 3 hour drive from court. Situation: 1. Receptionist says to fax ticket before Tuesday morning when JP does convictions. I faxed at 6:30pm Monday night, court closes at 4:30pm. Therefore it arrives before JP could possibly convict me. I called at 8:50am (opens at 8:30am) and receptionist says already convicted just before I called. 2. The previous Friday I actually faxed a completed form with Option 2 circled to plead guilty. A different receptionist informed me that in order to reduce the charge, I would need to select Option 3 not Option 2. Summary: The receptionist told me she could file my court date by phone as long as I fax the form before the JP convicts me Tuesday morning. However, I called the court at 8:50am and was told the JP had already convicted me (court opens at 8:30am). Is there anything I can do? Thank you
Charge:
141km/h on 401... 41 over.
Details:
Been 45 days since ticket and I live 3 hour drive from court.
Situation:
1. Receptionist says to fax ticket before Tuesday morning when JP does convictions.
I faxed at 6:30pm Monday night, court closes at 4:30pm. Therefore it arrives before JP could possibly convict me.
I called at 8:50am (opens at 8:30am) and receptionist says already convicted just before I called.
2. The previous Friday I actually faxed a completed form with Option 2 circled to plead guilty. A different receptionist informed me that in order to reduce the charge, I would need to select Option 3 not Option 2.
Summary:
The receptionist told me she could file my court date by phone as long as I fax the form before the JP convicts me Tuesday morning. However, I called the court at 8:50am and was told the JP had already convicted me (court opens at 8:30am). Is there anything I can do?
I don't know where you got 45 days from. You have 15 days (and I'm pretty sure the officer told you that as well) to select one of the three options. Whether they told you that you can fax the documents or not would be deciding on the jurisdiction. At this point, you will have to file a reopening and plead Not Guilty if it's granted.
I don't know where you got 45 days from. You have 15 days (and I'm pretty sure the officer told you that as well) to select one of the three options. Whether they told you that you can fax the documents or not would be deciding on the jurisdiction. At this point, you will have to file a reopening and plead Not Guilty if it's granted.
The back of the ticket says you have 15 days to respond. Although the receptionist was trying to be nice and accommodating, the fact that it was past 15 days means they did not actually have to try and help you at all. So the only thing you could try to do, is ask for a re-opening of the case... this may or may not work. Doesn't hurt to ask.
The back of the ticket says you have 15 days to respond.
Although the receptionist was trying to be nice and accommodating, the fact that it was past 15 days means they did not actually have to try and help you at all.
So the only thing you could try to do, is ask for a re-opening of the case... this may or may not work. Doesn't hurt to ask.
There is a 30 day grace period after the original 15 days. I planned to delay as long as possible to maximize any chance the trial would take more than 70 days from the original infraction date to schedule. Apparently there is a law stating that trial must be booked within this time. With that said, I read that sometimes JP will hear a case immediately upon granting a reopening. Given I live 3 hours away, might they consider that and hear me out then and there? In any case, you are right. I should have been more responsible.
There is a 30 day grace period after the original 15 days. I planned to delay as long as possible to maximize any chance the trial would take more than 70 days from the original infraction date to schedule. Apparently there is a law stating that trial must be booked within this time.
With that said, I read that sometimes JP will hear a case immediately upon granting a reopening. Given I live 3 hours away, might they consider that and hear me out then and there?
In any case, you are right. I should have been more responsible.
Who told you there was a 30 day grace period? I have not seen that anywhere. Also where are you getting this 70 day thing? I have not seen that anywhere either.
Who told you there was a 30 day grace period? I have not seen that anywhere.
Also where are you getting this 70 day thing? I have not seen that anywhere either.
Specifically related to Parking tickets only, it mentions in a few places [like 17(2) & 18.1(2)] that they must start the proceeding of conviction within seventy-five days after the day on which the alleged infraction occurred. So the 75 days number is valid for PARKING tickets only, not for speeding tickets.
Specifically related to Parking tickets only, it mentions in a few places [like 17(2) & 18.1(2)] that they must start the proceeding of conviction within seventy-five days after the day on which the alleged infraction occurred. So the 75 days number is valid for PARKING tickets only, not for speeding tickets.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…