Yesterday at 3:45pm I was W/B on Queens Queen at Yonge Street. Traffic was heavy and I was stopped on the east side of the intersection waiting to proceed so I would not be blocking the intersection. When there was space for me to proceed, I did and a car travelling E/B decided it would try to turn left. In order to avoid a low speed collision, I maneuvered my vehicle around the front end to proceed. At this point a TTC bus decided to proceed straight from the right hand turn lane (clearly marked) and struck the right front quarter panel of my vehicle at the pedestrian crossing on the west side of the intersection. My question is....is this a contravention of HTA 144(9) or something else? The bus was clearly in a right hand turn lane and proceeded straight through the intersection. The supervisor even told me that they would never get back into traffic without changing lanes in the intersection. Clearly another HTA violation. Any help would be greatly appreciated. TYIA
Yesterday at 3:45pm I was W/B on Queens Queen at Yonge Street. Traffic was heavy and I was stopped on the east side of the intersection waiting to proceed so I would not be blocking the intersection. When there was space for me to proceed, I did and a car travelling E/B decided it would try to turn left. In order to avoid a low speed collision, I maneuvered my vehicle around the front end to proceed.
At this point a TTC bus decided to proceed straight from the right hand turn lane (clearly marked) and struck the right front quarter panel of my vehicle at the pedestrian crossing on the west side of the intersection.
My question is....is this a contravention of HTA 144(9) or something else?
The bus was clearly in a right hand turn lane and proceeded straight through the intersection. The supervisor even told me that they would never get back into traffic without changing lanes in the intersection. Clearly another HTA violation. Any help would be greatly appreciated. TYIA
Some relevant portion of the Highway Traffic Act to consider is: 142.1 (1) Every driver of a vehicle in the lane of traffic adjacent to a bus bay shall yield the right of way to the driver of a bus who has indicated his or her intention, as prescribed, to re-enter that lane from the bus bay. 1994, c. 27, s. 138 (12). Buses have the right of way and vehicles are required to yield. They will even have a yield sign affixed next to the left rear turn signal. This started about 15 years ago. It's not illegal to change lanes in an intersection. You shouldn't do it, but you can. Although, you can't proceed from a turning lane into the intersection with the intention of merging. The issue to focus on here is probably the bus proceeding through the right turn lane through the intersection. Looking at the intersection, the bus has plenty of room to merge back without making such a maneuver. It's just become standard process among bus drivers to go continue past the bus bay and merge at the last possible moment. While the bus has the right of way in most cases, I don't believe this is one of them seeing how the maneuver wasn't legitimate. I'm guessing this is an insurance issue for you? They will use the fault determination rules to determine fault percentages.
Some relevant portion of the Highway Traffic Act to consider is:
142.1 (1) Every driver of a vehicle in the lane of traffic adjacent to a bus bay shall yield the right of way to the driver of a bus who has indicated his or her intention, as prescribed, to re-enter that lane from the bus bay. 1994, c. 27, s. 138 (12).
Buses have the right of way and vehicles are required to yield. They will even have a yield sign affixed next to the left rear turn signal. This started about 15 years ago.
The supervisor even told me that they would never get back into traffic without changing lanes in the intersection. Clearly another HTA violation.
It's not illegal to change lanes in an intersection. You shouldn't do it, but you can. Although, you can't proceed from a turning lane into the intersection with the intention of merging.
The issue to focus on here is probably the bus proceeding through the right turn lane through the intersection. Looking at the intersection, the bus has plenty of room to merge back without making such a maneuver. It's just become standard process among bus drivers to go continue past the bus bay and merge at the last possible moment. While the bus has the right of way in most cases, I don't believe this is one of them seeing how the maneuver wasn't legitimate.
I'm guessing this is an insurance issue for you? They will use the fault determination rules to determine fault percentages.
I just took a look at the intersection. A little bit before the intersection is a sign that indicates right turn. However, right underneath it, it says "Buses Excepted". With that said, this might be why the bus driver won't be found at fault. https://goo.gl/maps/YLTG8vUsPpLRLFVd6
I just took a look at the intersection. A little bit before the intersection is a sign that indicates right turn. However, right underneath it, it says "Buses Excepted". With that said, this might be why the bus driver won't be found at fault.
I have a lot of issues with the idea that speed measuring devices like radar and lidar guns are using computer generated simulations to test themselves that they are working properly. The manufacturer is making a claim that a device can test itself. Where's the proof that it works?
I was pulled over a couple days ago going down a steep incline on my way to Cobourg. In order to get up a hill in my vehicle, I have to go at least 90 or it gets stuck between gears and then when I was going down the hill I wasn't riding my brake or touching the gas, it just gained speed. When I…
Question, mrsbobajob, a while ago, went to a sleep went to a sleep clinics, due to snoring, not sure if sleep apnea. Now someone told her that if she does have SA, her insurance needs to know and it will go on her license. So she didnt go to pick up her report.
I hope I can paint the picture with the accuracy that the truth deserves. I have no intention of just beating a ticket.. but more like beating a really unfair ticket. You decide!
I had entered Canada after a short trip downsouth through Detroit on my way to Toronto. Not being equipped with a GPS…
alright well last night (march 19th) at 12:55 am i had recieved 2 tickets the first was failing to stop at a stop sign (i did a rolling stop) and it was dated the 19th the second ticket that i got at the exact same time was dated the 18th. The second one was because i had a blood alcohol level of…
I received a speeding ticket for 15 over in York Region. The officer issued me a ticket for someone else[wrong DL info on ticket] but for correct charge and amount. The ticket was not hand written but computer generated. I am concerned how to proceed with this as well as if the officer issued my…
i was in a road traffic accident on friday. a guy pulled out of a side road onto a main highway in front of me. i hit him in the middle of the road but was swerving left to hit him on the front and not cause a major accident. i was charged with failing to drive in a marked lane and he was charged…
i have a g2 license which was suspended for driving without a g1 driver for 30 days and my insurance cancel me . after i receive my letter to remove suspend, i got in an accident and now receive a notice to go to the police station
I was issued a Summons to Defendant, Section 7.1.b, and now I got to appear in court. Where could I find information on set fine amounts or the maximum punishment? Is it normal to be dragged to court for plate not properly displayed? After all, it is not a moving violation, and I wasnt endangering…