Hello everybody, I have a court date scheduled for next week (week of October 5th) for a ticket I received in fall 2008 for failing to stop at a stop sign. Upon receipt of my ticket, I opted to challenge my ticket at trial for two reasons: 1) the location, as it was hand-written on my ticket, does not exist (i.e., on the ticket, the location where the offence was allegedly committed appeared to say 51B John Street; however, upon receipt of my printed Notice of Trial I realized that the location was S.B. John Street (for southbound John St.) - the officer's handwriting made it look like 51B); and 2) the officer never looked at my vehicle registration, and the year of the vehicle on the ticket is incorrect (it says the vehicle was a 2008 model, while my model is 1997). Based on the above, I have several questions: 1) I have not yet requested disclosure, as I did not realize that I could do so until very recently; at this point, the trial date is so close that I don't think I will receive the documents in time, so how should I proceed? Can I request for my trial to be re-scheduled since I need more time to prepare my defence?; 2) Is incorrect information on the ticket sufficient enough to have the charges dropped? Thanks in advance for anybody's comments.
Hello everybody,
I have a court date scheduled for next week (week of October 5th) for a ticket I received in fall 2008 for failing to stop at a stop sign. Upon receipt of my ticket, I opted to challenge my ticket at trial for two reasons: 1) the location, as it was hand-written on my ticket, does not exist (i.e., on the ticket, the location where the offence was allegedly committed appeared to say 51B John Street; however, upon receipt of my printed Notice of Trial I realized that the location was S.B. John Street (for southbound John St.) - the officer's handwriting made it look like 51B); and 2) the officer never looked at my vehicle registration, and the year of the vehicle on the ticket is incorrect (it says the vehicle was a 2008 model, while my model is 1997).
Based on the above, I have several questions: 1) I have not yet requested disclosure, as I did not realize that I could do so until very recently; at this point, the trial date is so close that I don't think I will receive the documents in time, so how should I proceed? Can I request for my trial to be re-scheduled since I need more time to prepare my defence?; 2) Is incorrect information on the ticket sufficient enough to have the charges dropped?
The location error is minor error, and the year is your sticker year, so not enough to get it dropped. If the cop shows up at trial, yes ask the JP for adjournment to get disclosure as you just recently learned about it.
The location error is minor error, and the year is your sticker year, so not enough to get it dropped.
If the cop shows up at trial, yes ask the JP for adjournment to get disclosure as you just recently learned about it.
If it is over 10 months apply for a stay. Or when you get to court just tell them that is what you are going to do. My bet is they withdraw it.(either way) Cheers Viper1
1stTicket2009 wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have a court date scheduled for next week (week of October 5th) for a ticket I received in fall 2008 for failing to stop at a stop sign. Upon receipt of my ticket, I opted to challenge my ticket at trial for two reasons: 1) the location, as it was hand-written on my ticket, does not exist (i.e., on the ticket, the location where the offence was allegedly committed appeared to say 51B John Street; however, upon receipt of my printed Notice of Trial I realized that the location was S.B. John Street (for southbound John St.) - the officer's handwriting made it look like 51B); and 2) the officer never looked at my vehicle registration, and the year of the vehicle on the ticket is incorrect (it says the vehicle was a 2008 model, while my model is 1997).
Based on the above, I have several questions: 1) I have not yet requested disclosure, as I did not realize that I could do so until very recently; at this point, the trial date is so close that I don't think I will receive the documents in time, so how should I proceed? Can I request for my trial to be re-scheduled since I need more time to prepare my defence?; 2) Is incorrect information on the ticket sufficient enough to have the charges dropped?
Thanks in advance for anybody's comments.
If it is over 10 months apply for a stay.
Or when you get to court just tell them that is what you are going to do.
My bet is they withdraw it.(either way)
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
If it is over 10 months apply for a stay. Or when you get to court just tell them that is what you are going to do. My bet is they withdraw it.(either way) Cheers Viper1 Viper1 - so you think I should request a stay of proceedings? The court date will be more than 10 months from the offence date. This will be my first court appearance, so I'm not familiar with the mechanics. Should I just indicate my intentions to the prosecutor when I meet with him/her before my trial? I'm curious, what makes you think that they will withdraw the charges? Thanks again.
viper1 wrote:
1stTicket2009 wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have a court date scheduled for next week (week of October 5th) for a ticket I received in fall 2008 for failing to stop at a stop sign. Upon receipt of my ticket, I opted to challenge my ticket at trial for two reasons: 1) the location, as it was hand-written on my ticket, does not exist (i.e., on the ticket, the location where the offence was allegedly committed appeared to say 51B John Street; however, upon receipt of my printed Notice of Trial I realized that the location was S.B. John Street (for southbound John St.) - the officer's handwriting made it look like 51B); and 2) the officer never looked at my vehicle registration, and the year of the vehicle on the ticket is incorrect (it says the vehicle was a 2008 model, while my model is 1997).
Based on the above, I have several questions: 1) I have not yet requested disclosure, as I did not realize that I could do so until very recently; at this point, the trial date is so close that I don't think I will receive the documents in time, so how should I proceed? Can I request for my trial to be re-scheduled since I need more time to prepare my defence?; 2) Is incorrect information on the ticket sufficient enough to have the charges dropped?
Thanks in advance for anybody's comments.
If it is over 10 months apply for a stay.
Or when you get to court just tell them that is what you are going to do.
My bet is they withdraw it.(either way)
Cheers
Viper1
Viper1 - so you think I should request a stay of proceedings? The court date will be more than 10 months from the offence date. This will be my first court appearance, so I'm not familiar with the mechanics. Should I just indicate my intentions to the prosecutor when I meet with him/her before my trial? I'm curious, what makes you think that they will withdraw the charges?
A motion for a stay of proceedings needs to be filed (usually) 20 days or more in advance of the trial. It's probably too late for that now, but if you get your request in ASAP they may consider it. For now, take a look at this website: www.ticketcombat.com
A motion for a stay of proceedings needs to be filed (usually) 20 days or more in advance of the trial. It's probably too late for that now, but if you get your request in ASAP they may consider it. For now, take a look at this website:
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…