I turned right on a red light at a T intersection. I thought I was going to make the amber, which I didn't. Light turned red as I started making the turn. Considering the road was wet, visibility was perfect, and there were no cars or pedestrians about to enter the intersection, I deemed it safest to proceed with the turn rather than to slam my brakes. Obviously the law dictates otherwise. I won't even think about making any right turns at ANY light without a full stop now. In any case, disclosure is below. Is it air tight? I do take issue with the timing of my vehicle approaching the intersection. If I had approached 1 second after opposing traffic turned green, I would have been in an active intersection. I clearly remember the cars at both ends of the road I was turning onto being stationary. Please let me know if theres any hope of having this reduced. First offence and have been driving safely for over 15 years. Disclosure notes: Marked police cruiser stopped at red light on X Ave at Y Blvd headed northbound. It is a T-intersection where Y Blvd ends at X Ave. Observed traffic signal for traffic on X Ave turn green. Approximately 1 second later, observed the above MV traveling westbound on Y Blvd approaching the intersection, where it had a red traffic signal. The MV maintained a constant speed and turned right onto X Ave S, heading northbound. The wheels of the MV did not stop and it made no attempt to stop for the red traffic signal. Stop line and lights were clearly visible with no obstructions. Never lost sight of the MV, conducted traffic stop on X Ave S. Driver identified himself as the defendant with a val. ON DL, valid insurance and ownership surrendered. PON was issued. Intersection lights working properly, timing for Y Blvd traffic signals is approximately green - 20 seconds, amber - 4 seconds, all red - 2 seconds, advanced green arrow to right - 6 seconds, advanced amber arrow to right red - 1 seconds. All red - 1 second, red - 31 seconds. When the green advanced arrow is on for Y blvd westbound traffic, there is a red signal for traffic on X Ave S northbound traffic. When X Ave S northbound traffic has a green signal, the advanced arrow for Y Blvd traffic is off and a red traffic signal is shown. Road was wet, weather was overcast. Medium traffic in the area.
I turned right on a red light at a T intersection. I thought I was going to make the amber, which I didn't. Light turned red as I started making the turn. Considering the road was wet, visibility was perfect, and there were no cars or pedestrians about to enter the intersection, I deemed it safest to proceed with the turn rather than to slam my brakes. Obviously the law dictates otherwise. I won't even think about making any right turns at ANY light without a full stop now.
In any case, disclosure is below. Is it air tight? I do take issue with the timing of my vehicle approaching the intersection. If I had approached 1 second after opposing traffic turned green, I would have been in an active intersection. I clearly remember the cars at both ends of the road I was turning onto being stationary. Please let me know if theres any hope of having this reduced. First offence and have been driving safely for over 15 years.
Disclosure notes:
Marked police cruiser stopped at red light on X Ave at Y Blvd headed northbound. It is a T-intersection where Y Blvd ends at X Ave. Observed traffic signal for traffic on X Ave turn green. Approximately 1 second later, observed the above MV traveling westbound on Y Blvd approaching the intersection, where it had a red traffic signal. The MV maintained a constant speed and turned right onto X Ave S, heading northbound. The wheels of the MV did not stop and it made no attempt to stop for the red traffic signal. Stop line and lights were clearly visible with no obstructions. Never lost sight of the MV, conducted traffic stop on X Ave S. Driver identified himself as the defendant with a val. ON DL, valid insurance and ownership surrendered. PON was issued.
Intersection lights working properly, timing for Y Blvd traffic signals is approximately green - 20 seconds, amber - 4 seconds, all red - 2 seconds, advanced green arrow to right - 6 seconds, advanced amber arrow to right red - 1 seconds. All red - 1 second, red - 31 seconds.
When the green advanced arrow is on for Y blvd westbound traffic, there is a red signal for traffic on X Ave S northbound traffic. When X Ave S northbound traffic has a green signal, the advanced arrow for Y Blvd traffic is off and a red traffic signal is shown.
Road was wet, weather was overcast. Medium traffic in the area.
If the conditions are bad, you are required to drive accordingly. Amber lights are also not something to "make". You can't just go around blowing through amber lights either [Fail To Stop - 144(15) Amber Light]. Whether or not there were no pedestrians or cars is going to be irrelevant. Going through a red light is an absolute liability offense. All they need to prove is whether you went through the red or not. It's either "yes" or "no". Everything else is irrelevant. All you'd be doing is sealing your own fate as you're admitting to the fact. You're going to have to rely on a different approach or hope for some sort of deal.
Roger Doger wrote:
I turned right on a red light at a T intersection. I thought I was going to make the amber, which I didn't. Light turned red as I started making the turn. Considering the road was wet, visibility was perfect, and there were no cars or pedestrians about to enter the intersection, I deemed it safest to proceed with the turn rather than to slam my brakes. Obviously the law dictates otherwise. I won't even think about making any right turns at ANY light without a full stop now.
In any case, disclosure is below. Is it air tight? I do take issue with the timing of my vehicle approaching the intersection. If I had approached 1 second after opposing traffic turned green, I would have been in an active intersection. I clearly remember the cars at both ends of the road I was turning onto being stationary. Please let me know if theres any hope of having this reduced. First offence and have been driving safely for over 15 years.
If the conditions are bad, you are required to drive accordingly. Amber lights are also not something to "make". You can't just go around blowing through amber lights either [Fail To Stop - 144(15) Amber Light]. Whether or not there were no pedestrians or cars is going to be irrelevant.
Going through a red light is an absolute liability offense. All they need to prove is whether you went through the red or not. It's either "yes" or "no". Everything else is irrelevant. All you'd be doing is sealing your own fate as you're admitting to the fact.
You're going to have to rely on a different approach or hope for some sort of deal.
Agreed. Lesson learned. So I've got an early resolution meeting coming up. Could I ask for a deal at that point or am I just going to have to cancel this and request a trial to then ask for a lesser charge?
Agreed. Lesson learned.
So I've got an early resolution meeting coming up. Could I ask for a deal at that point or am I just going to have to cancel this and request a trial to then ask for a lesser charge?
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…