-
m4gician
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:29 pm
- Location: Toronto (Woodbridge), Ontario
- Contact:
-
m4gician
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:29 pm
- Location: Toronto (Woodbridge), Ontario
- Contact:
I asked for a log of all the tickets he has handed out that day as well and anything else that may be useful to me at trial. I will udpate when i get the details.
-
m4gician
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:29 pm
- Location: Toronto (Woodbridge), Ontario
- Contact:
One thing is that I have multiple defense strategies.
1) Stay application based on non disclosure
2) Objecting to use of Officer's notes because he does not have independent recollection
3) Highlighting that I have not received a manual that states the proper use of radar gun.
4) Highlighting that the officer did not sufficiently provide information the SPECIFIC model of lidar he used DOES NOT EXIST therefore having a prima face case where if he did not test a gun that does not exist, he did not test it and therefore the JP should have an easy time judging this.
5) If the above doesn't work, i'll talk the officer into circles and get him to describe my car wrong (in his notes he wrote my car was green -- it's black) and I'll have ownership to prove that.
6) Aruging that because I was not provided information and that I missed two days of work at 8 hours each day just to drive to nowhere's ville.
Wish me luck.
-
Reflections
- Moderator
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
-
liveontheedge
- Member
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:23 pm
don't think you will ever see that, it is a copyright document. To my understanding each crown has the manual for viewing purposes only and you can attend a look it over.m4gician wrote: 3) Highlighting that I have not received a manual that states the proper use of radar gun.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
-
Radar Identified
- Moderator
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
-
ticketcombat
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:59 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
You cannot deny access to or a copy of the manual on the basis of copyright, see IPC ORDER MO-2016 and s. 32.1(1) of the Copyright Acthwybear wrote:don't think you will ever see that, it is a copyright document. To my understanding each crown has the manual for viewing purposes only and you can attend a look it over.m4gician wrote: 3) Highlighting that I have not received a manual that states the proper use of radar gun.
Fight Your Ticket!
-
liveontheedge
- Member
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:23 pm
That's right, i was shot with this once, it's an Ultralyte. Its manual claims to have a "wheather filter" button which allows the speed reading taken in rain, snow or fog.Radar Identified wrote:Does Laser Atlanta have the Light or Ultra Light model? (Or I think they spell it Lyte or Ultra Lyte or something like that.) Thought I saw that somewhere.
-
Reflections
- Moderator
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
From what I know, 525 m and beam divergence 3 milliradians, let's see carry the 9, and the beam is 1.575 meters in diameter, or bigger then the frontal area of your car. The officer could have taken the reading from a car around you. Plus at that distance if the beam to targeting dot is out even 0.2 of a degree its a difference 1.82 m at that distance ........Make sure you get confirmation one way or the other whether or not the officer did the alignment check on the gun. In order for the JP to convict you he'll have to have it written down......last (reading) 141(km/hr) at 525.86m (metres)
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/20 ... cj217.html
Specifically:
[21] Officer Zarrello testified that he “tested†the “laser†device at 8:45 p.m. on June 4, 2006, more than a hour before securing the readings on the “laser†device of the appellant’s speed at 9:55 p.m. Officer Zarrello had no memory of when or whether he tested the “laser†device after the offence. His notes provided no assistance.
“Q. What time did you test the laser device after the alleged
offence?
A. Sorry, I don’t have it marked down in my book what time.â€ÂÂ
(Transcript February 13, 2007, page 24 lines 20-23)
[22] Did Officer Zarrello use the manufacturer’s manual as a guide when conducting the test on the laser device?
“Q. So did you use the manual when testing this device?
A. If I have to, yes.
Q. In this particular occasion did you use the manual to test the device?
A. I did not mark it down if I used it or not.
Q. So you said you had an independent recollection. Do you recall using the manual when testing the device?
A. No I don’t recall using it.â€ÂÂ
(Transcript February 13, 2007, page 16, lines 15-23)
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post Court date - How to tell if Officer is in court?
by t3ch9 in General TalkLast post by jsherk Wed Feb 08, 2017 8:07 pm
-
-
-
New post Court date interferes with disclosure?
by 007don in Courts and ProcedureLast post by argyll Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:50 pm
-
-
-
New post Summons 3 court date on ticket incorrect
by abc1414 in Courts and ProcedureLast post by iamnewhere Tue Jun 05, 2018 10:48 pm
-
-
-
New post Plead or Request court date? (Worthwhile?)
by High-miler in Hand-held devicesLast post by JAYJAY Tue May 31, 2016 9:22 pm
-
-
-
New post Handheld device - traffic court date tomorrow
by agentbubble07 in General TalkLast post by whaddyaknow Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:04 pm
-
-
-
New post Hand Held Communication Device Court date tomorrow 04/04
by akhan in Hand-held devicesLast post by akhan Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:48 am
-
-
-
New post Withdrawn ticket? Payed before court date, issued a refund.
by bimmer in General TalkLast post by admin Fri Sep 28, 2018 1:34 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
Help us, Help You!
Hello, we notice you may be using an adblocker...