I received a ticket for failing to obey a stop sign in January 2013. Officer said it was a rolling stop. I requested disclosure and she wrote 15km/h in her notes, but did not radar me. The speed limit was 50km/h in the area. I fully intended to stop, and I yielded caution as it was a 4 way stop and proceeded only when it was safe to do so. I took it to court this past week and armed with the "knowledge" of Ticketcombat - got my trial adjourned for another 2 months. I say "knowledge" because it was adjourned since the JP and prosecutor felt that I needed to seek legal counsel to receive a fair trial as my questions apparently were not relevant. I nearly directly copied the questions from the website section specific to fighting a stop sign ticket and basically got laughed out of court. The prosecutor objected several times to my questions (most of which were asking if the officer saw my vehicle slow down, to which she testified she did not, even though she wrote 15km/h and the speed limit is 50km/h) and the JP agreed with the prosecutor. I asked about her estimate of speed and other similar questions and they were all objected. The JP then asked if I would like to take the stand for my defense. I said that I would like to exercise my right not to take the stand. The JP had an extremely puzzled look and stared at me, then the prosecutor. The prosecutor then said that it was basically ridiculous that I would not take the stand at my own defense, and the JP agreed. I stated again that I would not like to take the stand (this is my first ticket and they could easily trip me up accidentally). They basically tried to force me into taking the stand, which I feel was being taken advantage of since I don't understand 100% of the legal system. I only did a lot of reading on ticketcombat prior to my trial. So the JP suggested I seek legal counsel and adjourned my trial for 2 months. Which I thought was strange but good given all the objections presented by the prosecutor and agreeing JP. So my questions now, how do I proceed? What questions should I be asking? Apparently I focused on speed way too much is what the prosecutor told me after the trial. They did not provide me with the by-law for the stop sign but I could see them taking advantage of me in court again. I did not argue improper disclosure at the time. Please help! Thanks
I received a ticket for failing to obey a stop sign in January 2013. Officer said it was a rolling stop. I requested disclosure and she wrote 15km/h in her notes, but did not radar me. The speed limit was 50km/h in the area. I fully intended to stop, and I yielded caution as it was a 4 way stop and proceeded only when it was safe to do so.
I took it to court this past week and armed with the "knowledge" of Ticketcombat - got my trial adjourned for another 2 months. I say "knowledge" because it was adjourned since the JP and prosecutor felt that I needed to seek legal counsel to receive a fair trial as my questions apparently were not relevant. I nearly directly copied the questions from the website section specific to fighting a stop sign ticket and basically got laughed out of court. The prosecutor objected several times to my questions (most of which were asking if the officer saw my vehicle slow down, to which she testified she did not, even though she wrote 15km/h and the speed limit is 50km/h) and the JP agreed with the prosecutor. I asked about her estimate of speed and other similar questions and they were all objected.
The JP then asked if I would like to take the stand for my defense. I said that I would like to exercise my right not to take the stand. The JP had an extremely puzzled look and stared at me, then the prosecutor. The prosecutor then said that it was basically ridiculous that I would not take the stand at my own defense, and the JP agreed. I stated again that I would not like to take the stand (this is my first ticket and they could easily trip me up accidentally). They basically tried to force me into taking the stand, which I feel was being taken advantage of since I don't understand 100% of the legal system. I only did a lot of reading on ticketcombat prior to my trial.
So the JP suggested I seek legal counsel and adjourned my trial for 2 months. Which I thought was strange but good given all the objections presented by the prosecutor and agreeing JP.
So my questions now, how do I proceed? What questions should I be asking? Apparently I focused on speed way too much is what the prosecutor told me after the trial.
They did not provide me with the by-law for the stop sign but I could see them taking advantage of me in court again. I did not argue improper disclosure at the time.
If the trial has reached the point where its your opportunity to take the stand, you wont have any further opportunity to question the officer. Id also hesitate a guess that if the JP is surprised youre not taking the stand, youve yet to raise a reasonable doubt against the Crowns evidence. Thats not to say you should take the stand, but it might not hurt to seek professional legal advice. Ticket combat is a great site with lots of great advice but dont use it as your only source of information.
If the trial has reached the point where its your opportunity to take the stand, you wont have any further opportunity to question the officer. Id also hesitate a guess that if the JP is surprised youre not taking the stand, youve yet to raise a reasonable doubt against the Crowns evidence. Thats not to say you should take the stand, but it might not hurt to seek professional legal advice.
Ticket combat is a great site with lots of great advice but dont use it as your only source of information.
i lost my license in an accident i had to due my exceeding amount of demerit points. i went to jail and made bail i was put on a curfew of 9am to 9pm stupidly enough i did not follow and i got pulled over for driving with a different cars license plates, no insurance, and violating my curfew... i…
I was charged for disobey sign (no left turn) in a winter noon time around Bay/Edward (the prosecutor/judge said it to be a Absolute liability offences but disobey sign is actually a strict liability offence, right? And I found this: For example, if you made an illegal left-turn where there were…
so got fined with 69km in a 50km, at bottom of hill...didn't even have foot on the gas. first ticket ever in over 10 years of driving. fine was 62$ and 3 points.
cop says take to court and get demerit points reduced. didn't even let me speak and walks away.
On my way to work today I got a 110 dollar ticket + 2 demerit points.
I was driving north on Bathurst and turned left onto a side street into a residential area before hitting the lights at Eglinton and Bathurst. I normally do this to avoid the big line up to turn left onto Eglinton.
On the 400 extension EB towards Barrie cops like to hide out under an over pass that is Ski Trails Rd. They tag people as the come over the crest of the hill and that is 900m from where this officer was standing.
I'm confused because I knew this, saw the cop, and checked my…
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of…
Today i got caught doing 115 in a 90 at Mayfield and 410 and what I have been reading is that this offence is 3 points. Seeing this is my first offence I'm unsure if the ticket is supposed to I lost 3 points or is that just automatic. Also should I go to fight it to drop the points and just pay the…
I was (recently) involved in a traffic accident where, due to icy road conditions, I slid into oncoming traffic while making a right turn, while they were coming towards me and stopping at a stop sign. This was a residential area and there's no way I was exceeding anything over 20KM/h on…