Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

WIN speeding 26 over
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:06 pm 
Offline
High Authority

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:18 pm
Posts: 1722
Back in April my wife got a 76 in a 50 charge and the officer knocked it down to 60 in a 50.

Checked the ticket but no fatal errors. Asked for trial and requested disclosure. Got the full radar manual and officers notes. His notes were pretty much bullet proof with tracking history and the TEST PASSED both before and after enforcement and all the other elements .

Went to court today (yes officer was there) and sat thru 3 hours of people mostly pleading guilty and setting trial dates then at 11am prosecution asked for short recess. There was only three of us left in the courtroom at this time. He spoke with the other two and sent one person off to go over notes with officer, then called me over and said "Well your charge is only a 10 over and this other guy has a failing to stop. If he wants to proceed to trial then we won't have time for yours because you filed a couple motions that we would have to deal with even before we start the trial. So if he wants a trial that will work in your favor and I will drop the charge. Any problems with that?" Of course I said "No, that sounds good to me."

When the other guy came back in from talking to officer, he told prosecutor he wanted to go to trial, so prosecutor told the officer (for my wife's charge) that he could leave and told me he would withdraw charge when JP came back in.

I will take a win anyway I can!!!

I will post all my notes and motions below so you can see the defence that I was prepared to use.

_________________
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 1:43 pm 
Offline
High Authority

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:18 pm
Posts: 1722
So here is my entire defence I had prepared including motions I filed and even disclosure requests.
https://copy.com/wzvOPlpNE6Z8nOAm

You will notice my first Notice of Motion was an Affidavit but then my second Notice of Motion was a Sworn Declaration. An affadavit must be notorized but a sworn declaration can just be signed by you, which is easier and cheaper and that's why I changed.

_________________
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:00 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 12:50 pm
Posts: 23
Just finished reading your detailed report thanks for that ! So basically prosecutor figured it would be too much work for 10 over ticket considering the 2 motions you have filed ?

I currently have a ticket from the same jurisdiction and the same court location using the same radar gun model, would it be a valid motion to file to have this particular device evidence dismissed due to lack of TAC ? Aren't the police aware that this could be easily challenged and for some reason are still using this device ? When do I file this motion , before the trial date ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:26 pm 
Offline
High Authority

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:18 pm
Posts: 1722
Well what happened is that because I filed the motions, my file got put at the bottom of the pile. At the end of the morning they had two trials to do, but only time for one, so the prosecutor decided to work on the other one as the charge was more serious. He did say if the other person was going to plead guilty and not go to trial that he would have proceeded. They will almost always do the self-represented trials at the end, and they will almost always keep the most complicated/longest for the end as well. However I was still prepared to go ahead with the trial and was not actually planning on them dropping it before it started.

I am not sure what the police are or are not aware of as far as the device is concerned. If you present evidence to be considered ahead of time in the form of a motion, then it makes them at least have to deal with it, and rebut it. Since I did not have to deal with the motion, I am not sure yet how they will try deal with it. Maybe they have other information that I did not have. You should file it as far in advance of the trial as you can so they have adequate time to prepare. And if you do file it, you need to be prepared to present it and defend it so you have to actually read the whole thing and understand each point as best you can... copy and paste motions do not work... you need to grasp the concepts.

_________________
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:16 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 12:50 pm
Posts: 23
Do you have any knowledge if filing to have radar evidence dismissed for that particular device has worked in cases before or is this something you came up with by yourself ?

Since the radar evidence is the main evidence, if the motion gets upheld does it basically dismiss the prosecutions case ? Officer can't testify what the radar said since it would not be allowed so what other testimony would he be able to submit ?

Also honestly, if the prosecutor did not see an easy likely hood to convict, perhaps that's why he told you this ? How does another case affect yours if he can just get another conviction ? They could have easily adjuourned to another date ? What I am saying is that your 2 motions might have been too difficult to deal with in his opinion and not worth the time and hassle ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:48 pm 
Offline
High Authority

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:18 pm
Posts: 1722
I came up with it myself and have not seen it used before.

If the radar evidence was excluded, then there is no evidence to your speed and the charge would have to be dropped.

I really can't speak to the prosecutors reasons. There was another guy that he sent out with officer to review officers notes, and while they were out there he told me that if the guy wanted a trial then he would drop mine, but if the guy was going to plead guilty then he would proceed with my trial. What I can tell you, is that sitting there for 3 hours of court and listening to the different discussions that the prosecutor was having with everybody, he seemed to me to be a very reasonable person, meaning that he was not interested in simply pressing forward and getting a conviction on everything he could, but was intead interested in the evidence and whether it was worthwhile to proceed. Yes, he could very well of asked for an adjournment for my trial (which I would have objected too), but then the police officer would have to come back again so I don't think he was concerned that it was too difficult.

You can not rely on the officer not showing up and you can not rely on the prosecutor thinking it will be to difficult. Although those are possibilities, you need to have a good defense prepared as well.

I sent you PM.

_________________
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:06 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:26 am
Posts: 18
jsherk wrote:
I will take a win anyway I can!!!


Yah, but for a split second weren't you disappointed that you didn't get to argue your case?

I had something similar happen and I was so pumped up and ready to present that it was almost a let down when the JP said I could go. Emphasis on the word "Almost"!

Congratulations!


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:33 pm 
Online
VIP

Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:30 am
Posts: 787
Nope I doubt it because there would have been much eye-rolling from the judge, and a conviction.

Even if the device isn't listed for Canada the evidence would have to show it wasn't accurate. If someone wanted to lay a charge against the officer for using an unapproved device then that would be an entirely different matter.

It's not like a breath alcohol measuring device which has to be listed in the CC.

He got it dropped because he was going to be a bigger pain in the ass than the time allowed for, not because his arguments had any merit.

_________________
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:54 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:33 pm
Posts: 128
argyll wrote:

He got it dropped because he was going to be a bigger pain in the ass than the time allowed for, not because his arguments had any merit.



So lesson learned here is, that it pays to be a pain in the arse, LMAO


Top
 Profile  
 
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:41 pm 
Offline
High Authority

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:18 pm
Posts: 1722
If the link above in the second post no longer work, then PM me directly for copy of the defence.

_________________
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. WIN speeding 25 over

jsherk

7

661

Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:04 am

rank View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. WIN on appeal - speeding 115 in a 100

jsherk

7

1181

Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:39 pm

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. WIN Improper Muffler

jsherk

0

970

Thu Oct 29, 2015 4:06 pm

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 136km/h in a 100km/hr, possible win?

OrangeRuf

3

16

Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:58 pm

OrangeRuf View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Radar units WIN over GPS

hwybear

4

1914

Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:54 am

Proper1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Left Turn, 141(5), Planning a win.

ManlyMinute

5

3138

Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:59 am

racer View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stop Sign-First appearance- Error on ticket. Chance to win?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

pardo9679

15

1894

Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:09 pm

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. speeding 15 and under

kebin

12

874

Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:29 am

Bookm View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Reflections

19

1290

Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:52 pm

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding

javi3340

4

1158

Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:59 pm

OTTLegal View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding in NS

4Q2

1

988

Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:22 pm

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Speeding 30 Over

Canadian1378

1

699

Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:40 pm

bend View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.