So happy to have stumbled across this site! I have been looking for a while for a site as useful as this with updated info as every other site I have come across has posts and info that is over 4 years old. I have quite the record of speeding (6+ convictions in 12 years driving) and only recently understood that by accepting a guilty plea with reduced fine and demerit points I was admitting my guilt. This time around I'd like to go to court to dispute my charge as I disagree the speed I was going and I don't think the reading on the radar was accurate. I got a ticket a couple months ago for speeding, 80 km in a 60 km zone, and I was very surprised he said I was going 80, he showed me the reading. I was coming toward him down a hill and he was standing on the sidewalk. I was going EB on Steeles after having turned from Islington, and moved over to pass the car in front of me. I requested my disclosure and it was ready for me 3 days later, which I was surprised about, but once I saw what was given to me, I am confused as it is not very helpful to me in any way. I requested officer notes, documentation of the model of device used, and any witness statements. As with some other posts, all I got was a computer copy of the front of my ticket and 5 photocopied pages from the UltraLyte user's manual on testing the device. Now I would like to know the following: - Based on the instruction manual, it states that to test the device, NONE of the following conditions should be present DURING TESTING (which I also would assume is necessary during use): - "make sure there is nothing behind the target that the instrument might detect" -- there was a car beside me on the right (the side the officer was on) a car behind me and a bridge above me - during scope alignment, a tripod is recommended and the target should be reflective and at least 200 M away -- no tripod was used - Delta Distance Test results (which I believe was the type of reading taken) indicate that based on the difference output by the device, that is the distance that you required to be at to obtain an accurate reading (with a differential range of 0.3 M) -- impossible for him to prove that my speed was recorded at EXACTLY that distance and within the discrepancy range as I was on a different vector than him - He informed me that I was being recorded (audio) -- I was not provided with a transcript of what was said (audio only, no video, noted on the disclosure) Based on the above, plus the photograph I have taken of the area where I was ticketed and where the officer was standing in comparison, do I stand a chance to have my ticket quashed? I am not rich and cannot afford a paralegal or representation and I believe that I am capable of defending myself and the facts I have noted above seem to indicate that my ticket is not "accurate". Should I be requesting further disclosure to show the testing results from the machine from that day as well as my audio transcript? I would also like to know what the little abbreviations he has at the top of the ticket copy mean...if anyone knows :) fd ID3 mpp3, grey ford h/b, 80 @ 238.8 L2, s c d, ULLRB The red part I obviously know is my car, but other than that I'm not sure. Any and all advice is welcomed and I thank you in advance for reading this!!
Thank you again everyone...I'm still deciding on the appeal route and if I will take it. I'm writing up the stuff I would need to submit so if I do choose appeal, I will be ready. I think I will prepare everything then get a consult from a professional and see what they think, if it's worth it or not. I cannot thank you enough for your help from the beginning of this whole process!! I did have one question though: in my "appeal" searches, it brought me to the POINTTS site and they have a statement there that says, "We can notify the Ministry of Transportation to have the conviction and the demerit points removed from your driving record until the appeal is finished." How is this possible if everywhere else I saw (including Government sites) that the conviction shows on your record UNTIL/UNLESS the charges are reversed, so how do these guys manage to have it disappear until the end of appeal?? That's very appealing to me, if it's true...
Thank you again everyone...I'm still deciding on the appeal route and if I will take it. I'm writing up the stuff I would need to submit so if I do choose appeal, I will be ready. I think I will prepare everything then get a consult from a professional and see what they think, if it's worth it or not. I cannot thank you enough for your help from the beginning of this whole process!!
I did have one question though: in my "appeal" searches, it brought me to the POINTTS site and they have a statement there that says, "We can notify the Ministry of Transportation to have the conviction and the demerit points removed from your driving record until the appeal is finished." How is this possible if everywhere else I saw (including Government sites) that the conviction shows on your record UNTIL/UNLESS the charges are reversed, so how do these guys manage to have it disappear until the end of appeal?? That's very appealing to me, if it's true...
I've received conflicting information in regards to that, as I've done been through the appeal process myself. Basically, after you file for appeal - they will usually (or at least they have to me) give you a number to call the Ministry of Transportation to let them know you're appealing. You then call that number, and they ask you to fax over your notice of appeal, and proof of payment of transcripts and fine(s). Now, after that step - I can't comment 100% what happens, because I've never been bothered to confirm. To summarize, I've heard conflicting reports - if you want the full story, read on. Long story: Basically, when I did it, what happened was... the lady (who worked at the court), told me to call that number and tell the ministry I'm appealing so it "doesn't show up on my record" (her exact words). I called the number (by the way, NOTE - if you do this, have a lot of free time. They've never picked up before putting me on hold for at least 25 minutes, sometimes up to an hour) and they told me, as mentioned earlier, fax them my notice of appeal, receipts for both my transcript and fine. I hung up, and did that... I called back a few days later, after being on hold for 35-ish minutes, they pick up and I ask if they got all my documents, they said they have but they contacted the court and are waiting to confirm everything, so I left it at that. Anyway, so my insurance renewal came up around a year later, at that time my appeal was still on-going, (appeal waits are long, mine was about a year at the time). I decided to fork over the 35 minutes and call them again before renewing in case my insurance companies decided to run my records this time, after the incredibly long wait - a lady picks up and I ask her if the ticket is still on my record for insurance purposes. She told me it's there, but it says "appealing" under it. So, I asked her what I tell insurance companies if they ask if I've received a ticket? She said "I'd tell them about it, and say you're appealing because it's still on your record". From then on, I always assumed that it meant that it's still on your record but it says appealing under it. Anyway, a few months later I won my appeal and contacted the ministry to see if it had been cleared from my record yet as I wanted to make sure it actually is erased from my record at some point. The lady told me "Yes, it's not on your record because it says you're appealing - but no, the court hasn't given us the ruling yet". So, this lady made it seem like the insurance companies cannot see it on the record and the whole appealing thing (under your conviction) is just an administrative note for the Ministry. Anyway, I never bothered to call back again and get a decisive answer - as I've heard conflicting information, but if Pointss claims that, then I would presume that it is actually off your record, but they're not doing anything special. As soon as you appeal, usually they'll give you the number to call, if they don't, just ask - and you can do the exact same thing they do for you - now whether or not insurance companies will still see it while it says appealing, or it disappears, I cannot say. Generally, at least in Criminal law, when you appeal you have to make an order to stay the charges pending the appeal - so in that aspect it would still be on your record unless otherwise stated, but this is a provincial offence, and it would be expensive, and resource consuming for a Judge to hear every person wanting it to stay off their record for an appeal, so this may be the alternative for provincial offences... but, I can't say definitively one way or the other... but by the wording of what Pointss claims "notify the Ministry", that's exactly the same thing you do when they give you the number to call, so they're not doing anything you can't do for free - the only hassle is the 30-60 minute wait times.
bee_bee wrote:
Thank you again everyone...I'm still deciding on the appeal route and if I will take it. I'm writing up the stuff I would need to submit so if I do choose appeal, I will be ready. I think I will prepare everything then get a consult from a professional and see what they think, if it's worth it or not. I cannot thank you enough for your help from the beginning of this whole process!!
I did have one question though: in my "appeal" searches, it brought me to the POINTTS site and they have a statement there that says, "We can notify the Ministry of Transportation to have the conviction and the demerit points removed from your driving record until the appeal is finished." How is this possible if everywhere else I saw (including Government sites) that the conviction shows on your record UNTIL/UNLESS the charges are reversed, so how do these guys manage to have it disappear until the end of appeal?? That's very appealing to me, if it's true...
I've received conflicting information in regards to that, as I've done been through the appeal process myself. Basically, after you file for appeal - they will usually (or at least they have to me) give you a number to call the Ministry of Transportation to let them know you're appealing. You then call that number, and they ask you to fax over your notice of appeal, and proof of payment of transcripts and fine(s). Now, after that step - I can't comment 100% what happens, because I've never been bothered to confirm. To summarize, I've heard conflicting reports - if you want the full story, read on.
Long story:
Basically, when I did it, what happened was... the lady (who worked at the court), told me to call that number and tell the ministry I'm appealing so it "doesn't show up on my record" (her exact words). I called the number (by the way, NOTE - if you do this, have a lot of free time. They've never picked up before putting me on hold for at least 25 minutes, sometimes up to an hour) and they told me, as mentioned earlier, fax them my notice of appeal, receipts for both my transcript and fine. I hung up, and did that...
I called back a few days later, after being on hold for 35-ish minutes, they pick up and I ask if they got all my documents, they said they have but they contacted the court and are waiting to confirm everything, so I left it at that. Anyway, so my insurance renewal came up around a year later, at that time my appeal was still on-going, (appeal waits are long, mine was about a year at the time). I decided to fork over the 35 minutes and call them again before renewing in case my insurance companies decided to run my records this time, after the incredibly long wait - a lady picks up and I ask her if the ticket is still on my record for insurance purposes. She told me it's there, but it says "appealing" under it. So, I asked her what I tell insurance companies if they ask if I've received a ticket? She said "I'd tell them about it, and say you're appealing because it's still on your record".
From then on, I always assumed that it meant that it's still on your record but it says appealing under it. Anyway, a few months later I won my appeal and contacted the ministry to see if it had been cleared from my record yet as I wanted to make sure it actually is erased from my record at some point. The lady told me "Yes, it's not on your record because it says you're appealing - but no, the court hasn't given us the ruling yet". So, this lady made it seem like the insurance companies cannot see it on the record and the whole appealing thing (under your conviction) is just an administrative note for the Ministry. Anyway, I never bothered to call back again and get a decisive answer - as I've heard conflicting information, but if Pointss claims that, then I would presume that it is actually off your record, but they're not doing anything special. As soon as you appeal, usually they'll give you the number to call, if they don't, just ask - and you can do the exact same thing they do for you - now whether or not insurance companies will still see it while it says appealing, or it disappears, I cannot say.
Generally, at least in Criminal law, when you appeal you have to make an order to stay the charges pending the appeal - so in that aspect it would still be on your record unless otherwise stated, but this is a provincial offence, and it would be expensive, and resource consuming for a Judge to hear every person wanting it to stay off their record for an appeal, so this may be the alternative for provincial offences... but, I can't say definitively one way or the other... but by the wording of what Pointss claims "notify the Ministry", that's exactly the same thing you do when they give you the number to call, so they're not doing anything you can't do for free - the only hassle is the 30-60 minute wait times.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…