Hi I know I'm in big trouble so just trying to prepare myself as best as I could. In Oct I was pulled over while driving to a job interview with expired license plates and Ireins had just recently frozen my insurance as I could no longer afford the payment. I had been out of work since start of the year and was unable to renew my plates in May (the renewal date) or keep up on insurance payments. I explained this to the officer and he told me he's going to let me off without a ticket but that I should immediately have my insurance unfrozen. I did that immediately after he left, calling my insurance agent and reinstating my insurance that very day. Today I received a Summon notice from Courts for April 5th where I'm being charged with the following: (1) Drive motor vehicle, no current validation on plate - Highway Traffice Act s. 7(1)(c)(i) (2) Operate motor vehicle without insurance - Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act s. 2(1)(a) (3) Produce False Evidence - Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act s. 2(3)(b) certain copies of and/or original books, records and documents, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, including the following - Certified Documents - Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (driving record / VIN / plate by date search etc) - Allstate Insurance Company - Representative / Business Records / Policy Information / Insurance card / Other insurance related documents -officers notes -this notice My date is set for April 5th, 2017. Is the summon to meet with the prosecutor or with the Justice of Peace? Should I plead not guilty and hope to god for a plea deal? It was the only time I drove my car and it just to get to the job interview all the way in Scarborough as it was not easily accessible by TTC/transit... I desperately need my car in order to keep my current job not to mention my license and I know my insurance will skyrocket...PLEASE ANY INFO WILL HELP, I've never been through anything like this before and have no one really to turn to. I'm assuming at best I'm looking at a $5000 fine for which I'll have to go on payments for as I dont have that much at the moment sadly.
Topic
Summon, driving w/out insurance, first time offense
Well even if the prosecutor drops both the CAIA charges, you could still plead not guilty and request a trial and disclosure for the plate charge. Maybe the officers notes are missing something so at trial that one would get dismissed as well. You would have to ask your insurance company how that particular charge would affect your insurance, but it definitely not as bad as driving without insurance charge.
Well even if the prosecutor drops both the CAIA charges, you could still plead not guilty and request a trial and disclosure for the plate charge. Maybe the officers notes are missing something so at trial that one would get dismissed as well.
You would have to ask your insurance company how that particular charge would affect your insurance, but it definitely not as bad as driving without insurance charge.
When you're showing up for trial charged with driving with no insurance and trying to mislead an officer into thinking you had insurance, you want to go to court and try to do the same exact thing and show them you've learned absolutely nothing. What can possibly go wrong? There's no set fine for driving without insurance. It's $5,000 to $25,000. I'd suggest maybe hiring someone to do the talking and try to minimize the damage as much as possible. However, it's your decision.
When you're showing up for trial charged with driving with no insurance and trying to mislead an officer into thinking you had insurance, you want to go to court and try to do the same exact thing and show them you've learned absolutely nothing. What can possibly go wrong?
There's no set fine for driving without insurance. It's $5,000 to $25,000.
I'd suggest maybe hiring someone to do the talking and try to minimize the damage as much as possible. However, it's your decision.
If the car insurance company says you were covered that day, then you were covered and there is nothing misleading. If they say you were not covered until a certain time on that day, then it would be misleading only if you tried to say you were covered before the time the insurance company says your coverage started. Will you risk driving without insurance in the future knowing now that there is a possibility of a $5,000 fine? I bet you learned something! These are serious charges though so you should seriously consider legal advice and legal representation. And remember everything I tell you on this forum is not legal advice... it is just simply my opinion of what I would do if it were me in the same situation.
If the car insurance company says you were covered that day, then you were covered and there is nothing misleading. If they say you were not covered until a certain time on that day, then it would be misleading only if you tried to say you were covered before the time the insurance company says your coverage started.
Will you risk driving without insurance in the future knowing now that there is a possibility of a $5,000 fine? I bet you learned something!
These are serious charges though so you should seriously consider legal advice and legal representation. And remember everything I tell you on this forum is not legal advice... it is just simply my opinion of what I would do if it were me in the same situation.
I understand what you and Bend are saying and that it is a very FINE line here for me. Trust me I've learned my lesson big time just from the stress of it. I have gotten a letter that states my coverage was reinstated on Oct 21st, 2016 at 2:50 pm and my insurance says that the LEO called in to check the status of my insurance at 3:00 PM. Given all this information I still feel I should just state that I thought I was insured that day and it turned out I wasn't as my policy was originally supposed to be resintated on Oct 1st, 2016 when I originally froze coverage (which I have the documents and signed forms for + communication with my Insurance agent via email). On Oct 1st when my insurance agent emailed me he was reinstating coverage I told him ok but my car was just sitting there with a dead battery and he messaged me saying lets hold off. On the day I sent the officer my insurance electronically I had forgotten that my policy wasn't reinstated Oct 1st as per the signed forms. Irregardless I drove to my YMCA interview with no insurance. That is the fact.
jsherk wrote:
If the car insurance company says you were covered that day, then you were covered and there is nothing misleading. If they say you were not covered until a certain time on that day, then it would be misleading only if you tried to say you were covered before the time the insurance company says your coverage started.
Will you risk driving without insurance in the future knowing now that there is a possibility of a $5,000 fine? I bet you learned something!
These are serious charges though so you should seriously consider legal advice and legal representation. And remember everything I tell you on this forum is not legal advice... it is just simply my opinion of what I would do if it were me in the same situation.
I understand what you and Bend are saying and that it is a very FINE line here for me. Trust me I've learned my lesson big time just from the stress of it. I have gotten a letter that states my coverage was reinstated on Oct 21st, 2016 at 2:50 pm and my insurance says that the LEO called in to check the status of my insurance at 3:00 PM.
Given all this information I still feel I should just state that I thought I was insured that day and it turned out I wasn't as my policy was originally supposed to be resintated on Oct 1st, 2016 when I originally froze coverage (which I have the documents and signed forms for + communication with my Insurance agent via email). On Oct 1st when my insurance agent emailed me he was reinstating coverage I told him ok but my car was just sitting there with a dead battery and he messaged me saying lets hold off. On the day I sent the officer my insurance electronically I had forgotten that my policy wasn't reinstated Oct 1st as per the signed forms. Irregardless I drove to my YMCA interview with no insurance. That is the fact.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…