Ignition interlock devices, further provisions - 41.3 Parties to judicial review (1) The parties to any judicial review brought in respect of section 41.2 are the Registrar and the person whose drivers licence is subject to the condition prohibiting him or her from driving any motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Documents privileged (2) Documents filed with the Ministry for the purposes of section 41.2 are privileged for the information of the Ministry only and shall not be open for public inspection. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Protection from personal liability (3) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against a person authorized under subsection 41.2 (14) to install or maintain an approved ignition interlock device, unless the person was negligent in the performance of his or her duties and responsibilities under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Same (4) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against the Registrar or any employee of the Ministry for the removal of a condition prohibiting a person from driving a motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device or for the failure to remove the condition, if the Registrar or employee acted in good faith in the execution or intended execution of his or her duties under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1. Crown not relieved of liability (5) Despite subsections 5 (2) and (4) of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, subsections (3) and (4) do not relieve the Crown of liability in respect of a tort committed by a person mentioned in subsection (3) and (4) to which it would otherwise be subject. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Ignition interlock devices, further provisions - 41.3
Parties to judicial review
(1) The parties to any judicial review brought in respect of section 41.2 are the Registrar and the person whose drivers licence is subject to the condition prohibiting him or her from driving any motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Documents privileged
(2) Documents filed with the Ministry for the purposes of section 41.2 are privileged for the information of the Ministry only and shall not be open for public inspection. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Protection from personal liability
(3) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against a person authorized under subsection 41.2 (14) to install or maintain an approved ignition interlock device, unless the person was negligent in the performance of his or her duties and responsibilities under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Same
(4) No action or other proceeding for damages shall be instituted against the Registrar or any employee of the Ministry for the removal of a condition prohibiting a person from driving a motor vehicle that is not equipped with an approved ignition interlock device or for the failure to remove the condition, if the Registrar or employee acted in good faith in the execution or intended execution of his or her duties under section 41.2. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Crown not relieved of liability
(5) Despite subsections 5 (2) and (4) of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, subsections (3) and (4) do not relieve the Crown of liability in respect of a tort committed by a person mentioned in subsection (3) and (4) to which it would otherwise be subject. 2000, c. 35, s. 1.
Hi, my husband was in an accident last July. He was making a left hand turn into a side road and the other driver passed on the left side. His turn signals and taillights were not working. When the officer showed he checked the lights and the brake lights did work. Tickets were not issued.…
I was driving on highway 7 on a day when it had been raining, though wasn't at the time, going under 100 when while going on a bend in the road, I wafted out onto the gravel at the side of the road, and overcompensated for that by doing a hard turn back- which put me over…
i was travelling on the 401 (posted speed 100km/h) in the far left lane, when i caught up to a vehicle going ~110km/h. I patiently waited for the vehicle to move over a lane, but they did not. The vehicle behind me moved to the center lane to pass, but because he was a safe distance behind me, i…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
Was stopped for speeding. Officer put 95kmh in a posted 80kmh zone.... but failed to put in the section information - it was left out. Will that amount to a "law doesn't exist" fatal error? I asked because I cannot find "95kmh in a posted 80kmh zone" in the HTA....
I want to get some help with a speeding ticket i'm fighting.
On Jun 23, 2012 I was charged with speeding 106 in an 80 zone. I filed my ticket for trial on Jun 27, 2012. Late July i received my 'notice of trial' indicating a trial date for Jan 8, 2013. On August 1, 2012 I requested for disclosure…
How long does an officer/crown have to charge or alter a Highway Traffic Act charge?
An officer charged my mom under 141(6) but it should have been 141(5). Six months have passed already and the court date is set for a few months from now. My hope is that the crown will not be able…
