Ontario Highway Traffic Act

You're saying you 'imagine the car sped up to 126-127', he's going to say his calibrated authorised equipment said 130. See where this is going ?

Please do let us know how it goes. Few do, but it is much appreciated.

I do think you are failing to see the woods for the individual trees you are looking at. One minute isn't going to be considered enough for a quash.

On the other issue you are asking the JP to effectively cancel every such ticket in the province or to dig up roads to move the coils. It just isn't going to happen. For a second, imagine that they ...

I'm afraid you're going down a route that others have tried and failed at. Just because the pictures do not contain all the elements of the offence does not mean that the charge is not made out. You must have approached the intersection in order to be there. And just because you cannot see the front bumper does not mean the JP cannot make an ...

It isn't just parked.....it's parked and with the flashing red lights activated.

The phone has to be mounted, ie attached to the vehicle. A case doesn't make any difference.

whaddyaknow wrote: Tue May 01, 2018 10:07 am I think "in the same direction" refers to the traffic being passed.

ah yes, that makes sense.

There is a lawyer working your case so let them do their job. The amount of the claim is ludicrous and she is just hoping for an easy settlement. If the insurance company want to give her one to save on legal fees then that is fine but there is no way (based on what you have told us) that it is even going to be close to the million limit.

I don't quite understand. The notes seem to say that you were travelling in the same direction as the cruiser but then it says they used opposite mode and did a U-turn ?

Hi,
Thanks for your advice.
In answer to your query, I was driving on a sinuous road in a residential area in Toronto, and when I glanced at my clock, I continued straight and hit two cars in the oncoming lane. It was the weekend, and although there were a lot of cars on the road, traffic was flowing. I was following traffic, and it did not feel ...

How the second summons came to be reissued is irrelevant to your situation. You have to deal with the fact that it has been.

There is nothing to stop you trying to plead your case for a no licence deal - you may get a different Crown or the same Crown in a better mood. You have nothing to lose by asking.

Other than that, you're going to be really ...

The Stig wrote: Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:02 pm Speeding isn't section 120, it's section 128.

Yup and that is a clear zero not just a bad pen !

Did you object at the time ?

ynotp wrote: Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:18 pmCountersue?

On what grounds ?

The police officer is going to testify that you were holding it. It may come down to a he said / she said situation.