Hi, I was recently charged with careless driving for an at fault accident, in which due to a moment of distraction, I hit two cars in the incoming lane. All three cars would need to be replaced I was told. I feel terrible, but I was relieved that everyone was ok. I was following traffic, and I was not checking my cell. One driver as a precaution went to the hospital, but before leaving the paramedic thankfully said that he should be ok. As a result, the cops showed up and charged me with careless driving. Until then, I had a clean record, and accident forgiveness. I have never been in such a situation before, and I am quite thankful for this forum and its contributors. The prosecutor at the early resolution meeting told me the accident is proof of my carelessness, and that the burden of proof lies with me to demonstrate otherwise. Is that true? The Justice of the peace was unwilling to accept any plea deals without disclosure. So off I went to request disclosure, but was informed that without a trial date I cannot do so. I was just notified of my trial date in about two weeks, and that I need to request disclosure between six to eight weeks beforehand! Real short notice! I should have hired a professional from the onset. Aside from the careless driving being dropped, what charge should I hope for? With respect to any civil liability lawsuit, I would be better off not pleading guilty to any charge. I am trying to gain a better understanding of all the implications associated with any decisions that I may make. Any advice, or suggestions would be much appreciated. I still feel guilty/terrible, but a careless driving charge has tremendous implications. Thank you very much,
Hi,
I was recently charged with careless driving for an at fault accident, in which due to a moment of distraction, I hit two cars in the incoming lane. All three cars would need to be replaced I was told. I feel terrible, but I was relieved that everyone was ok. I was following traffic, and I was not checking my cell.
One driver as a precaution went to the hospital, but before leaving the paramedic thankfully said that he should be ok. As a result, the cops showed up and charged me with careless driving. Until then, I had a clean record, and accident forgiveness. I have never been in such a situation before, and I am quite thankful for this forum and its contributors.
The prosecutor at the early resolution meeting told me the accident is proof of my carelessness, and that the burden of proof lies with me to demonstrate otherwise. Is that true?
The Justice of the peace was unwilling to accept any plea deals without disclosure. So off I went to request disclosure, but was informed that without a trial date I cannot do so. I was just notified of my trial date in about two weeks, and that I need to request disclosure between six to eight weeks beforehand! Real short notice! I should have hired a professional from the onset.
Aside from the careless driving being dropped, what charge should I hope for? With respect to any civil liability lawsuit, I would be better off not pleading guilty to any charge. I am trying to gain a better understanding of all the implications associated with any decisions that I may make.
Any advice, or suggestions would be much appreciated. I still feel guilty/terrible, but a careless driving charge has tremendous implications.
Some more details of what happened would help but it sounds like you strayed into the incoming lane. Alternative charges could be Failure to Drive in Marked Lane, Failure to Turn Out to Avoid Collision. While a conviction doesn't help the civil liability prices is a different one. It sounds like you won't really have a leg to stand on when it comes to whose fault it was. It is the prosecutors job to show that you were driving carelessly. Not the other way around.
Some more details of what happened would help but it sounds like you strayed into the incoming lane.
Alternative charges could be Failure to Drive in Marked Lane, Failure to Turn Out to Avoid Collision.
While a conviction doesn't help the civil liability prices is a different one. It sounds like you won't really have a leg to stand on when it comes to whose fault it was.
It is the prosecutors job to show that you were driving carelessly. Not the other way around.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
Hi, Thanks for your advice. In answer to your query, I was driving on a sinuous road in a residential area in Toronto, and when I glanced at my clock, I continued straight and hit two cars in the oncoming lane. It was the weekend, and although there were a lot of cars on the road, traffic was flowing. I was following traffic, and it did not feel like I was speeding. I was told that it was a bad accident, but thankfully everyone seemed ok. Thank you
Hi,
Thanks for your advice.
In answer to your query, I was driving on a sinuous road in a residential area in Toronto, and when I glanced at my clock, I continued straight and hit two cars in the oncoming lane. It was the weekend, and although there were a lot of cars on the road, traffic was flowing. I was following traffic, and it did not feel like I was speeding. I was told that it was a bad accident, but thankfully everyone seemed ok.
I'm afraid that this looks like a textbook Careless Driving charge. of course, Crown still needs to prove it either through witnesses or things that you have said but remember that there is a difference between what you have to tell then police after a collision, ie for their reports, and what they can use against you in a trial. You'd probably want to look at legal advice before straying into voir dires though. If manage to get offered a lesser charge, I'd bite their hand off.
In answer to your query, I was driving on a sinuous road in a residential area in Toronto, and when I glanced at my clock, I continued straight and hit two cars in the oncoming lane. It was the weekend, and although there were a lot of cars on the road, traffic was flowing. I was following traffic, and it did not feel like I was speeding. I was told that it was a bad accident, but thankfully everyone seemed ok.
Thank you
I'm afraid that this looks like a textbook Careless Driving charge. of course, Crown still needs to prove it either through witnesses or things that you have said but remember that there is a difference between what you have to tell then police after a collision, ie for their reports, and what they can use against you in a trial. You'd probably want to look at legal advice before straying into voir dires though.
If manage to get offered a lesser charge, I'd bite their hand off.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
