Search found 202 matches

HTA Section 153 (1): Where a highway has been designated for the use of one-way traffic only and official signs have been erected accordingly, vehicles and street cars shall be driven only in the direction so designated.

Just adding onto this, the new crosswalk law, where you need to wait until the person completely exits the intersection. There is one right near the entrance of my work, and 9/10 times, someone is usually crossing. So I stop, wait for them to completely finish crossing, then proceed. I'd say out of all the times I do that, 50% of the time ...

The regulation is not HTA related... Topic MOVED

Regulation mostly deals with people on foot.

However, people still need to be cognizant of all laws. There are so many areas even within one Act, such as the HTA that people don't know, once an officer knows a section, then can enforce it. A couple come to mind that rarely people know. If a road ...

Even if the zone drops from 100 to 80, you were caught doing 135. There's no if, ands or buts. Speeding is speeding. Going with the flow of traffic I understand, but I highly doubt traffic was flowing at 130-140. Majority of the time when I'm on the 410, everyones doing 80-110, with the occasional Honda/Acura swerving lanes.

Just go to your ...

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1854.html

The cover is fine, I'm going off this to assume any ticket based on the cover will be dismissed. Any suggestions for the rear cam though, how do you guys do it?

HTA 13(2)
Every number plate shall be kept free from dirt and obstruction and shall be affixed so that the entire number plate ...

Contact MTO for Clarification. Accordingto what you said, you should be suspended until September 27th 2016.

UPDATE 2: Just had my ER for the improper headlights. Prosecutor said that I was guilty and insists I plead guilty. I said nope, I'll be waiting for my trial date in the mail. So much for the officers word of them dismissing the charge.

Maybe if the proper channels were used, i.e. calling 911 prior, then a summons wouldn't be issued. None the less, if I'm getting chased by armed gunmen, I really don't care, I'm gonna slap 210 right across any road I can.

some other people will be around I'm sure, but my comments
As already mentioned speeding is an absolute charge, things that won't fly as a defense

1> Going any speed over the posted speed limit
2> Going with the flow of traffic
3> Over taking
4> Trying to drive safely
5> Not knowing the speed limit
6> The speed limit is unfair
7> I was ill and ...

t3ch9 wrote:You can't get charged for the "warning".

It's highly unlikely, but if an officer wants, they have 6 months to issue a Part III summons. Like I said, highly unlikely, but it is possible.

http://www.lawtimesnews.com/20140407389 ... microscope

The article Stanton was reffering to in the first post.

"My methods are a secret..." Yup, so trustworthy

Congrats on your win! Thanks for updating us, as half of the posts on here do not provide the outcome. I hope you found this website quite resourceful.

And Jsherk Returns! Welcome back!

As for the plate scenario, you must put Ontario Plates on the vehicle to register it in Ontario. I understand the authenticity behind having your old plates, but Ontario Regulations state that they must be issued by Ontario.

HTA 13(1)

13. (1) No number other than that upon the number plate furnished by the ...

No officer just "gives out tickets". You break the law, you get a ticket. If you are polite and respectful, you could get a warning or reduced charge. But if you roll your window down 2 inches, saying I am giving you my license because I am required to and it is not voluntary, as well as saying I refuse to say anything to incriminate myself, then ...

Something Similar to this happened to my brother.

July 2014: Summons, Race a Motor Vehicle.
December 2014: Acquired G License.
March 2015: Charged with Speeding 149km/h in posted 100km/h zone. Recieved notice in the mail that license is suspended 30 days from when ministry recieves it due to Novice Escallating Drivers Sanctions.
July 2015 ...

I was under the assumption as if they don't ask, I don't reveal. I'm not lying to them, just not telling them about it. If they ask, I'll be truthful. I've been on the same policy with the same provider for 7 years and not once have they asked me about tickets.

Haven't seen jsherk around in a while, so I'm gonna take a chapter from his book.

I suggest you plead NOT GUILTY and request a trial with the officer present. Once you get your court date, request disclosure and review the officers evidence. That's the only way you can properly defend yourself. After reviewing the disclosure, you can call the ...

Please keep topics to one thread.

As for the OTT chances, they have a database on which officer shows up to court or not. My guess is they have 10 cases with that officer, he missed court 6 times, and showed up 4 times, or something along those lines. They actually won't go for a full trial (not to my knowledge) because they get paid no matter ...

do you not have a certain amount of time to report an accident,
as long as no-one is injured,?
UK there is not sure about here

in other words you can drive off, as long as you do report it within 24 hours

txs

If the lamp post stayed standing, you could go to a collision reporting centre. Once it obstructs traffic (i.e. cars/pedestrians) then ...

I highly doubt an officer is going to come up to your car and say "The reason I'm stopping you is because it's the last day of the month." Usually if you get stopped, it's because either A) You're breaking the law or B) They suspect you're breaking the law. As Argyll posted somewhere before, police have every right to stop you once you're on a ...

http://www.cupelocal79.org/about/what-we-do/


That should answer your question. No, they are not included in the work to rule.

Highly Unlikely, But You Never Know

1) before and after each shift is what the manual says.
2) tested at 7AM and 7PM. Therefore, if you were stopped between that time, it's a valid test.

HTA 62 (9)

No motor vehicle shall carry on the front thereof more than four lighted lamps that project a beam having an intensity of over 300 candela. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 62 (9).

Update: Recieved my Notice of Trial today for the 16 of May, 2016. I filed my ticket, pleading not guilty on April 25, 2015. This puts me just over a year. Would an 11b still be possible for this?

Given that OP is looking for a reduced charge, he should not have any issues talking to prosecution, talking to the officer won't help him since the officer can not reduce the charge he already filed.

The OP doesn't want a reduced charge, she wants no charge, or a Non-HTA charge. Don't quote me on this, but I remember reading that some bylaw ...

I don't know where you got 45 days from. You have 15 days (and I'm pretty sure the officer told you that as well) to select one of the three options. Whether they told you that you can fax the documents or not would be deciding on the jurisdiction. At this point, you will have to file a reopening and plead Not Guilty if it's granted.

Call the Provincial Offenses Office ASAP and see if the ticket was filed.

I thought if they filed it, they'd be the ones to fight it. If they only filed it for me, and I represent myself, that would be the best option.