Search found 1367 matches

The onous is on the crown to get the trial scheduled within 11 months of the ticket being issued. There is plenty of case law, here on the site that pertains to this very subject......... how you do this in court is up to you. Remember though, that you are not a lawyer and you don't need all the fancy jargon, just bring a copy of the CANLII ...

lil4cyl wrote:
Further explained that my neck is too straight and doing the exact opposite of what it should , <add more confusion, I thought a straight, good posture was important>.

Your neck and spine should have some natural curvature.... that might be what they are talking about.

Call the court office, number should be on the back of your ticket, and explain what happened. They should allow the change.

Yup, it's a no no, same as radar detectors.

I'm glad you have learned from this, and I am also glad you didn't get completely @#$%^& in the process.


Now, don't do it again!

Take your own pictures and present them as evidence in court. Make sure you take them, that way you can testify to the validity of them. If you don't see the sign, "no right between Time X and Time Y" then the ticket should get tossed.

That would be an extremely strong accusation, you had better be sure that it happened if you intend to bring it up.

M E R R Y C H R I S T M A S & HAPPY NEW YEAR 2012 [/color][/size]


I just want to give a shout out to our GREAT Moderators for all their time, effort, support, and help with maintaining this forum board for the better, and not the worst!

A SPECIAL Thanks goes out to our Moderators: Hwybear, Radar Identified, and Reflections.

Also, A Great ...

After an amount of time, if there is no response from you, the courts "assume" you are abandoning the appeal. If you wish to continue the appeal, then go to the hearing and state why you are. If it's a matter of missing correspondance then this will be srted out. This is one of the "checks" in the system to ensure the courts are not revisiting ...

Sounds like a verbal warning to me.......... Try this, get the light fixed and take a picture with the date on it. If this comes up again, you have proof of the fix.

Not a big deal.

I'd still fight it based on the fact that it is an unassumed road.

The city bears no responsibility for the road, therefore has no right to enforce their by-laws to it.

They have basically stated that it's not their road........ i'm not sure how this would stand up, it is only my opinion.

you were north of Orangeville on hwy 10. That is not a big distance to time 2 vehicles. Disclosure is definitely needed.

you were north of Orangeville on hwy 10. That is not a big distance to time 2 vehicles. Disclosure is definitely needed.

LowNSlow wrote: Is it illegal to record a conversation between an officer and I when I get pulled over?

Not as far as I know.

Put a sticker inside your window, "Converstions May Be Recorded"....... see what transpires.

Hi everyone,

City of Ajax has a 3AM - 6AM no parking on streets rule that doesn't get enforced often. I don't even know why that rule is because snowplow trucks don't even show up till 8AM. First ticket in 5 years on a road beside my home that has a sign which says, "Developer maintained - Unassumed Road,....city bylaws apply".

My questions:
1 ...

So by about 35 seconds how fast were you going and what is the speed limit?

And we are missing if the Jeep cut anyone off.... just sayin.

There is a thread here from a young gent who thought that he was being "racially" selected.

His solution was to write an essay, very well worded I might add, and sent it off to the local, Metro Toronto PS.

I believe his issues disappeared shortly after the letter was sent. I'll see if I can find it, but would advise you to look too, just in ...

3:00 am = very light traffic, usually..... wonder if air support was available?

Once you got to a built up area though, you did see the pursuit vehicle had stopped... so possibly there lies the answer.

Slow merging = Stoopidity, but that's just my personal opinion.

However, there have been numerous times I have gotten on to the 407 at Neyegawa heading east and some sally who for whatever reason decides it's ok to get to the end of the ramp doing 70!!

The flow of traffic in this area is around 110-120 at pretty much all times of the day. This ...

If you bring that to court and there is still something missing, IMO you are good for a stay. Something being testing notes or other info you would require to mount a full defense.

Thanks for the OP clarification. It doesn't make the whole answer much clearer however, unless you mean because you unable to represent me, not to worry.

Does the Prosecutors office have the various radar operating manuals on hand? or would I have to go to the Police to request a copy or at least be given the opportunity to read it on site ...

hwybear wrote:

Reflections wrote: Prove that there was someone behind you, or get the officer to admit it and you're home free. .

I believe I could get reasonable doubt......... unfortunately I can't do it for the OP here.

I don't know that I can prove the other vehicle was traveling faster, I am hoping to suggest that, and attempt to introduce doubt so that the reading could be attributed to either vehicle. Unless you know of a strategy to prove it?

I have already requested disclosure a 2nd time, on October 7, but as of today I haven't received it.

As I ...

If the car behind you was moving faster, then you will have to prove it. It is not hard to prove that you can get a radar reading from the second vehicle. As far as radar guns, you'll need the make and model used... you can find details online from there. Go for a second disclosure request, ask for typed/legible notes, if you don't get the details ...

Double post, locking this one.

Linky:

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight. ... 26961.html

Lots of references to most of the major speed cases

so are you saying its possible for one direction of a road can be considered a built up area and the other direction a posted 60km/h zone?

I lean to "no". a road is a road and visibility is usually equal no matter which direction you are going. the built up area covers both directions..... take pictures and prove to the crown that the signage ...

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/was-it-149kmh ... 1mjce.html

Damn, Lidar guns do make errors

so are you saying its possible for one direction of a road can be considered a built up area and the other direction a posted 60km/h zone?

I lean to "no". a road is a road and visibility is usually equal no matter which direction you are going. the built up area covers both directions..... take pictures and prove to the crown that the signage ...

Sticky'd